Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US general warns Russia on nuclear bombers in Cuba
AFP via Yahoo.com ^ | July 22, 2008 | Jim Mannion

Posted on 07/22/2008 11:14:20 AM PDT by Maceman

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Russia would cross "a red line for the United States of America" if it were to base nuclear capable bombers in Cuba, a top US air force officer warned on Tuesday.

"If they did I think we should stand strong and indicate that is something that crosses a threshold, crosses a red line for the United States of America," said General Norton Schwartz, nominated to be the air force's chief of staff.

He was referring to a Russian news report that said the military is thinking of flying long-range bombers to Cuba on a regular basis.

It was unclear from the report whether that would involve permanent basing of nuclear bombers in Cuba, or just use of the island as a refueling stop.

In his confirmation hearing to become the air force's chief of staff, Schwartz was asked what he would recommend if Russia were to base nuclear capable bombers in Cuba.

"I would certainly offer the best military advice that we engage the Russians not to pursue that approach," he said.

The newspaper Iszvestia on Monday cited an unnamed senior Russian air force official in Moscow as saying that Russia may start regular flights by long-range bombers to Cuba in response to US plans to install a missile defense system in eastern Europe.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Cuba; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: coldwar2; communism; cuba; geopolitics; monroedoctrine; russia; sovietunion; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 07/22/2008 11:14:21 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Obama says it’s ok, so what’s the deal?


2 posted on 07/22/2008 11:15:55 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (USA: Ticking off lesser nations since 1776. Now in our 232 year of business!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Obama says it’s ok, so what’s the deal?

He does? I'd think it would be his big chance to play JFK. He could order a "non-aggressive" Naval blockade. ;-)

3 posted on 07/22/2008 11:19:12 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Missiles of October again.


4 posted on 07/22/2008 11:21:06 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Inform the Russians that any temporary OR permanent basing of nuclear capable bombers in Cuba will result in the immediate retargeting of each and every nuclear warhead in the United States inventory on their original Cold War targets, and reiterate and affirm that our land based missile posture will be “launch on warning”, meaning that if the Russians are stupid enough to lob any missiles in our direction, those missiles will find nothing but empty silos upon arrival.

Likewise, begin aggressive ASW efforts and pinging the living Hell out of every Soviet (errr, ‘Russian’, right) boomer that is lurking around ANYwhere in the world.

And when those ancient TU-95 Bear bombers come poking around our national borders, scramble our interceptors with orders to arm and lock on their weapons and be sure those Russian pilots (the ones that will be crapping their pants) know about it.

No more Mr. Nice Guy.


5 posted on 07/22/2008 11:22:50 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Agreed.

We (TAA) has been preaching this for years. DO NOT TRUST THE RUSSIANS.

No one has listened.

Until now.


6 posted on 07/22/2008 11:36:37 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Looks like I'll be jumping under my school desk again. ‘Cept I need a much bigger desk this time around.
7 posted on 07/22/2008 11:39:20 AM PDT by 4yearlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

Wing attack. Plan R.


8 posted on 07/22/2008 11:50:02 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

If I’m not mistaken the Russians had sold or based MiG 23’s in Cuba. MiG-23’s were essentially equivalent to F-111’s & therefore probably nuclear-capable. As others have stated, Tu-95 Bears have made runs down our coastline to Cuba. While they are mostly maritime surveillance systems now, how could you really know what that big sucker is carrying?


9 posted on 07/22/2008 12:03:32 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

Reminds me of my Catholic school days when the nuns would tell us to duck underneath our desks and face away from nearby New York City during one of the many air raid tests.
I can still remember the wailing of those sirens.


10 posted on 07/22/2008 12:14:15 PM PDT by Larry381 (That's not the flagpin I knew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Larry381

I was living in Phoenix,AZ. during those times. I also remember the sound of the siren as I sat wide eyed under my desk. I was thinking what good is this if the school is on fire. I had no concept of nuclear weapons.


11 posted on 07/22/2008 12:23:03 PM PDT by 4yearlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Likewise, begin aggressive ASW efforts and pinging the living Hell out of every Soviet (errr, ‘Russian’, right) boomer that is lurking around ANYwhere in the world.

Our ASW assets are a shadow of their former Cold War level. The S-3s are gone. Most P-3 squadrons have been disbanded. Much of the SOSUS network has been decommissioned. Not much left to ping the living hell with.

12 posted on 07/22/2008 12:31:10 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
We (TAA) have been preaching this for years.
DO NOT TRUST THE RUSSIANS.
No one has listened.
Until now.


Everytime I think about our illustrious President waxing poetic about 'peering into the soul' of KGB veteran Comrade Pooty-Poot, I want to heave a cinder block through the TV.

George W. Bush should have spent some time reading the works of the now late John Barron, and Robert Conquest. Either of those two great authors would have been able to tell our President that the 'soul' he was seeing in Putin's eyes was just the reflection of his own soul, because there IS no soul in Putin's black heart, bet on it.
13 posted on 07/22/2008 12:31:29 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Our ASW assets are a shadow of their former Cold War level. The S-3s are gone. Most P-3 squadrons have been disbanded. Much of the SOSUS network has been decommissioned. Not much left to ping the living hell with.

All the more reason to revive our ASW capability and ramp it up pronto.

I know FRiend, easier said than done. The 'Rats control the Congress and there is an even chance they'll controll all three branches of government by next January.
14 posted on 07/22/2008 12:34:09 PM PDT by mkjessup (If the choice is a suntanned Jimmy Carter or a Cranky Old Guy, I'm with the Cranky Old Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

bump


15 posted on 07/22/2008 12:37:22 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (A citizen using a weapon to shoot a criminal is the ultimate act of independence from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I very much doubt our government has the will to face down the Russians on this or much of anything else. I hope I am wrong. I suppose we will find out sooner or later.


16 posted on 07/22/2008 12:46:00 PM PDT by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Bring it Russki bastards!


17 posted on 07/22/2008 2:04:50 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

You are not alone, I have been preaching it as well. It would be wise for us all to be prepared, it is not a matter of if, but when.


18 posted on 07/22/2008 2:26:29 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scory

It depends upon who is elected President!


19 posted on 07/22/2008 2:30:09 PM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman

Elect me president and the runway will have craters in it when they arrive.


20 posted on 07/22/2008 3:59:19 PM PDT by omega4179 (B.Hussein Keep the change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson