Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Biofuels Disaster Must End - Another failed energy policy, courtesy of the Washington...
National Review Online ^ | April 28, 2008 | Phil Kerpen & James Valvo

Posted on 04/29/2008 10:29:04 AM PDT by neverdem









The Biofuels Disaster Must End
Another failed energy policy, courtesy of the Washington central planners.

By Phil Kerpen & James Valvo

Big-government, command-and-control technocrats believe that when central planning fails, the solution is a better plan and smarter planners. They never step back and look at whether planning makes sense in the first place. This was true of the Soviet Union, with tragic five-year plan after five-year plan. It was true of Communist China, with Mao’s revolutionary upheavals. And today, here in the United States, it is true of government energy policy.

The 1970s and early 1980s saw all manner of failed energy policies — from Nixon’s Project Independence price controls, to Ford’s CAFE mandates, to Carter’s Synthetic Fuels Corporation and windfall profits tax, to Bush and Clinton’s publicly financed push for electric cars. The latest example is the 36-billion-gallon biofuel mandate enacted into U.S. law last year.

U.S. dependence on imported energy continues to reach record levels while no commercially viable biofuels have been produced. At the same time, the government-subsidized burning of our food supply to create ethanol has both increased carbon dioxide emissions and driven up food prices at a startling rate. This must end.

Even environmentalists are calling for a halt to government subsidies and mandates on biofuels. Lester Brown, founder and president of the Earth Policy Institute, and Jonathan Lewis, a climate specialist with the Clean Air Task Force, spoke out on Earth Day with an article titled “Ethanol’s Failed Promise.” They outlined the desperate need for Congress to abandon a policy that should never have been enacted. In a daze over rising fuel costs, increased dependence on foreign oil, and a fear of carbon emissions, Congress has been backing the politically favored food-to-fuel ethanol program. But “the mandates are not reducing our dependence on foreign oil,” wrote Brown and Lewis. “Last year, the United States burned about a quarter of its national corn supply as fuel — and this led to only a 1 percent reduction in the country’s oil consumption.”

The failure to reduce oil dependence is not the only flaw in the ethanol program. It also has driven food prices disturbingly high. The World Food Program is warning that the upward pressure on food prices is likely to lead to a “silent tsunami” of hunger. Josette Sheeran, the program’s executive director, warned that “The price of rice has more than doubled in the last five weeks.” The World Bank estimates that food prices have increased by 83 percent in three years. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown acknowledged what many have been saying for years: “The production of biofuels needs to be urgently re-examined.”

Unintended consequences are the inevitable result when politicians pick untested feel-good solutions to market-created concerns. A decade of ethanol policies has once again proven this true. But we now stand on the cusp of an even larger congressional blunder: cap-and-trade. And this time higher food prices will not be the only negative result.

The Congressional Budget Office says current cap-and-trade legislation would amount to a $1.2 trillion tax hike on the American economy over the next ten years. This tax will be passed along to consumers in the form of higher prices for gasoline, electricity, heating oil, food, and any product that is transported to market. In the throes of an ethanol disaster, it would be inexcusable for politicians to ignore these hardships.

But we’ve seen this too many times before. Each new generation of central planners believes the previous generation wasn’t smart enough. Yet central economic planning is forever doomed to failure since the approach itself limits human freedom, ingenuity, entrepreneurship, and innovation. These are the true engines of prosperity, and they will best manage all our problems, including those in the energy arena.

— Phil Kerpen is policy director and James Valvo is policy and public affairs assistant for Americans for Prosperity.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: biofuels; centralplanning; energy; food; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2008 10:29:10 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
Big-government, command-and-control technocrats believe that when central planning fails, the solution is a better plan and smarter planners.

Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2 posted on 04/29/2008 10:31:59 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks; neverdem

ETHANOL MADNESS must end. Biodiesel is not a problem........


3 posted on 04/29/2008 10:33:03 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“The more the plans fail, the more the planners plan.”
- Ronald Reagan


4 posted on 04/29/2008 10:33:24 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Used to be the military-industrial complex...

Today it’s the eco-government complex.


5 posted on 04/29/2008 10:34:55 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

3rd world country here we come. No way will the government keep its nose out of anything.


6 posted on 04/29/2008 10:36:00 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

“The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government, and I’m here to help”
- Ronald Reagan


7 posted on 04/29/2008 10:39:04 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Washington knew this didn't make sense from the git-go, but went through with it anyway because it would win the farm vote. Ethanol takes 1 unit of energy input to produce 1.18 units of output; a gain of 18%. Oil, on the other hand, is about 1:10,000 and switchgrass is 1:8. Washington can do more for me at the pump by just getting out of the way and let the oil companies reinvest their 10% return in more oil production. It wouldn't hurt if the friggin’ tree huggers let us drill in ANWR and off shore, plus build new power plants and refineries without an 8 year permitting cycle. Moral of story: Washington screws things up, it doesn't solve things.
8 posted on 04/29/2008 10:39:45 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem
It's amazing how the congress so easily made a lateral slide from bashing Big Oil to subsidizing Big Biofuel.
10 posted on 04/29/2008 10:46:05 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Boycott Genocide. Boycott the Olympics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I agree that ethanol must stand on it’s own, but what does it have to do with the price of rice, and how exactly are we burning our food?


11 posted on 04/29/2008 11:03:18 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. Fight back or STFU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Supply and demand for all food is out-of-kilter.
If one type of food is more expensive, then demand shifts and other food types have more demand, etc.

Acreage devoted to biofuels is enormous and is causing this imbalace ... and hurting the environment to boot...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/21/AR2008042102555_pf.html


12 posted on 04/29/2008 11:15:07 AM PDT by WOSG (Gameplan: Obama beats Hillary, McCain beats Obama, conservatives beat RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Note how much better things are now that democrats rule in congress no word from Nancy P.


13 posted on 04/29/2008 11:18:08 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Search for New Oil Sources Leads to Processed Coal

14 posted on 04/29/2008 11:26:20 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall k<now that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If the government would finally let modern diesel vehicles be sold in the US, the overall fuel economy of US passenger vehicles could double in a matter of years.

The diesel VW Rabbit has been getting 55mpg for decades, and we're supposed to be impressed by a hybrid??

Honda will be introducing diesel engines in its 2009 models - picture a Honda Accord getting 60 miles per gallon.

15 posted on 04/29/2008 11:26:42 AM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
The coal in the ground in Illinois alone has more energy than all the oil in Saudi Arabia.

That first sentence alone should be blared across the US 24-7 until we "get" the message!.............

16 posted on 04/29/2008 11:29:32 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
Note how much better things are now that democrats rule in congress no word from Nancy P.

Isn't she supposed to be 3rd in command of USA> Pray for the safety of Pres. Bush and vp Chaney then. Pelosi is just and old, egotistical, over-botoxed, pseudo intellectual, leftist pile of poop.

17 posted on 04/29/2008 11:30:11 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

The federal government is not the problem with diesels. It’s California, NY and several other “progressive” green states that have adopted tougher standards than the feds.........Manufacturers don’t want to sell diesels here unless they conform to all 50 states laws...........


18 posted on 04/29/2008 11:31:31 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Montana Coal To Gasoline Interview on Glenn Beck

19 posted on 04/29/2008 11:38:23 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall k<now that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

But that will happen, and has happened due to all sorts of things, both caused and not caused by the govt.

We do not ‘burn’ corn as the article hypes. All that is used is the starches and sugars. The major ‘food’ use for that now is soft drinks, and I don’t think anyone will starve if they don’t have their pop. The next is starch for additive to a number things like baked goods. It’s such a small part of the whole even a steep price rise won’t affect the price of what it’s part of that much.

The protein and oil are not used and can be extracted up front. The protein can be fed to livestock (which is the largest use for corn right now) and the oil for cooking and biodiesel. No, it’s not being done large scale yet, but as ethanol refineries get more efficient it will. It’s deceptive for the article to imply that we consume the whole kernel and it’s gone.

Yes, increased ag production means more fertilizer and less conservation ground...just as it has everytime prices have gone up, ethanol or nonethanol related, as does competition for ground. For the article to frame it as if it’s never happened at all till ethanol came along is dishonest.

If we stopped all ethanol production today, the 25% increase in the corn supply would certainly lower prices some, but that volume is not enough to explain the price levels we are seeing, since prices have more than tripled in a few years.

You really want to know what’s pushing food prices? 1) China, and 2) fuel costs of transportation


20 posted on 04/29/2008 11:44:50 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. Fight back or STFU!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson