Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Koch Still Pulls No Punches: New Book Includes Surprising Revelation About James Baker
Jewish Press ^ | February 27, 2008 | Rafael Medoff

Posted on 02/29/2008 5:37:29 AM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

1 posted on 02/29/2008 5:37:33 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

2 posted on 02/29/2008 5:38:31 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Koch, along with Zell Miller, Sam Nunn and a few others, prove that not ALL Democrats are insane.

Still, it's the safe assumption.

3 posted on 02/29/2008 5:42:23 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

That “ugly statement” was 100% true.

The Jewish vote is a democrat constituency.

Perhaps Baker should have phrased it more diplomatically?
“Regardless of our course of action, the Jewish vote will go to whoever is running as a democrat and whatever we accomplish will be undone...”

There, is that better?


4 posted on 02/29/2008 5:42:49 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If Mccain wants the anti-Semitic James Baker (not the first I heard Baker was a Jew hater) in his administration....you can bet McCain will be weak dealing vs Islamic Terror

Koch may be a liberal but he has been very supportive on the War on Terror


5 posted on 02/29/2008 5:47:08 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Anyone Notice....But It Is Only The Low-Rated Talk Radio Hosts That Support McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You think Koch will endorse Obama with his antisemitism?
6 posted on 02/29/2008 5:49:55 AM PST by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This is ethnic politics, not anti-Semitism.

You can bet that Baker would have given them what they wanted, if they had voted Republican.


7 posted on 02/29/2008 5:50:03 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

hmmmm...


8 posted on 02/29/2008 5:52:20 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

He did, however, serve as the mayor's link to the Caped Crusader.

9 posted on 02/29/2008 5:53:53 AM PST by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Perhaps Baker should have phrased it more diplomatically? “Regardless of our course of action, the Jewish vote will go to whoever is running as a democrat and whatever we accomplish will be undone...”

A situation caused to a large extend by Republican bigots like Baker.

Reagan got 39% of the Jewish vote in 1980.

31% in 1984

Bush I got 35% in 1988.

Secretary of State Baker, a bigot, tells Jews like me who voted for Bush to go FU*K ourselves. Classy from a Republican official.

Surprise, surprise, Bush I drops from 35% in 1988 to 11% in 1992, and though I wasn't one of them I can't blame any Jew for voting for Clinton over a President who tolerates bigotry.

And no, there's been no recovery, and yes, Republicans defend Bakers bigotry.

Let me also say that for an official to base American foreign policy on the voting habits of a domestic minority should be a disqualification from office. Shame on Bush I for never addressing this.

10 posted on 02/29/2008 5:54:11 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
The President of the United States' job is not to trade favors for votes.

The President's job is to do the right thing.

James Baker was apparently more interested in returning favors and using the power of of the US government for if-you-scratch-my-back-I'll-scratch-yours deals.

Baker is beneath contempt and did not deserve to serve in the Reagan administration.

11 posted on 02/29/2008 5:54:24 AM PST by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Perhaps Baker should have phrased it more diplomatically? “Regardless of our course of action, the Jewish vote will go to whoever is running as a democrat and whatever we accomplish will be undone...”

Nor do they still hold office.

12 posted on 02/29/2008 5:55:04 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If Baker was Jesse Jacskon, Calypso Louis Farrakhan, Carol Moseley Braun, Cynthia McKinney or Al Sharpton nothing would have been made of the comments.

Oh right.

Didn’t they say similar things and then not taken to task?


13 posted on 02/29/2008 5:56:27 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; All
Hillary FJB
14 posted on 02/29/2008 5:57:07 AM PST by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: SJackson

And shame on Bush II for never addressing Baker’s perfidy on the Iraq Study Commission.


16 posted on 02/29/2008 5:57:28 AM PST by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan
If Baker was Jesse Jacskon, Calypso Louis Farrakhan, Carol Moseley Braun, Cynthia McKinney or Al Sharpton nothing would have been made of the comments.

I aggree with your equivalency, but I've seen criticism from all of them, both from the right and the left. Including Koch. You must not be looking.

Please ping me when any are nominated to cabinet positions.

17 posted on 02/29/2008 5:58:57 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
WHY did Jack Kemp go to Koch and tell him this?? What was in it for Kemp? Sounds kind of school boyish tattle tale.

Ed Koch and other Jews are HURT by words like these, forget what actions are taken because the Democrats actions are usually AWFUL against the Jews, but they say NICE WORDS.....so by Kemp telling this to ed, he has caused a bigger rift and more hurt feelings. Weird.

18 posted on 02/29/2008 6:02:07 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

“Also in the running, it appears, is Zbigniew Brzezinski, who served as President Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser. Years before Baker’s hostile remark about American Jews, Brzezinski, then an adviser to candidate Carter, was reported (by Marvin Kalb) to have said to an Israeli official, “How will you like the idea of working with a new president who owes nothing to the Jews?”

In March 1980, Koch caused a major controversy when he criticized Brzezinski and three other top Carter Mideast advisers as a “Gang of Four” who were trying to turn the U.S. against Israel. (The reference was to a group of Chinese leaders who had been pushed out of power by their rivals.)

“During his years in the Carter administration, Brzezinski did indeed push for a tilt against Israel, as he acknowledged later in his memoirs of that period. More recently, he and several colleagues issued a statement urging the U.S. and its allies to engage in “a genuine dialogue” with Hamas. Brzezinski has endorsed Senator Barack Obama for president and reportedly is part of Obama’s circle of foreign policy advisers.”

Obama would definately ‘CHANGE’ our foreign policy! Brzezinski has actively undermined our efforts in the WOT!


19 posted on 02/29/2008 6:02:22 AM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Isn’t Zbigniew Brzezinski currently advising Barak Hussein Obama?


20 posted on 02/29/2008 6:04:52 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson