Posted on 11/30/2007 3:58:44 PM PST by shrinkermd
One myth dogging the immigration debate is that employers are fibbing (or grossly exaggerating) when they claim that hiring foreign professionals is unavoidable because U.S.-born Ph.D.s are hard to come by. But a new report on doctorates from U.S. universities shows they're telling the truth, and then some.
Foreign-born students holding temporary visas received 33% of all research doctorates awarded by U.S. universities in 2006, according to an annual survey by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. That number has climbed from 25% in 2001. But more to the point of business competitiveness, foreign students comprised 44% of science and engineering doctorates last year.
"China was the country of origin for the largest number of non-U.S. doctorates in 2006," says the report, followed by India, Korea, Taiwan and Canada. "The percentage of doctorates earned by U.S. citizens ranged from lows of 32% in engineering and 47% in physical sciences, to highs of 87% in education and 78% in humanities." Given this reality, is it any wonder that 40% of Ph.D.s working in U.S. science and engineering occupations are foreign-born?
Immigration opponents still claim that the likes of Intel and Oracle merely want to hire Chinese engineers on the cheap. In fact, U.S. law already prohibits companies from paying these foreign nationals less than natives. And all other things being equal, the American job applicant has an advantage because employers are required to pay an additional $4,000-$6,000 in taxes and fees on every H-1B visa holder they hire.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
More open borders nonsense from the WSJ. Big surprise there. Thanks, Rupert.
Why is this “open borders nonsense?”
So, according to the Laws of Supply and Demand, they're being more highly compensated owing to their greater worth??
For some no doubt good reason, Americans don’t see a doctorate as the key to a decent career anymore. For foreign nationals it is exactly the key, but Americans have other options.
Yeah, that’s how it works. Unless you are an astro-physicist, or hold a Ph.D in some other area with no practical application.
Companies like Oracle and Intel sure don't need foreigners to suppress labor costs in the U.S. In fact, wasn't it some big shot from Intel who recently pointed out that his company could hire cheap foreign labor IN THOSE FOREIGN COUNTRIES to do most of the work they need these folks to do?
This is so ridiculous. People here don’t seek PhD degrees because they aren’t necessary for the vast number of jobs available. There is such a thing as being overeducated.
When a person doesn’t know it is impossible, well they just go right on ahead and do it. I’ve come to the conclusion that most college educations teach you what isn’t possible.
WSJ
Wage Supression Journal
“In fact, U.S. law already prohibits companies from paying these foreign nationals less than natives.”
LOL. Just dummy up some job ads at lower wages, make job specs so specific they fit the foreigner, SOP.
“And all other things being equal,”
I bet they’re not since they aren’t detailed, and are those “fees” only a one time shot? How come business aren’t failing with the HB1 cap level where it is now?
I’m not even sure people are complaining about
This may not be because there aren't enough American applicants, but because these universities won't accept a lot of American ones. I wonder what the Chinese people would say if 44% of doctorate candidates accepted into Chinese graduate schools were foreigners. Or what Americans would say if 44% of college slots were reserved for foreigners.
You mean the Americans we're not graduating, and the Indian and Chinese we are . . . who then return to their home countries? That doesn't sound like good public policy.
Disclaimer: I know nothing about about the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
One myth dogging the immigration debate is that Americans are opposed to legal immigration, and to encouraging foreign Ph.D. candidates to our shores.
This article does a nice job of perpetuating that myth, when the legal importation of skilled talent is not the issue at all.
The first is the correct choice. Americans just don’t apply for doctoral programs in technical disciplines in great numbers.
According to this article, Microsoft announced it is opening a software development center in Vancouver. Canadians are not known for being less "expensive" than us.
Only foreigners are dumb enough to go in the technical disciplines. Americans know that the real action is the law. Science and business is all evil. At least that is was I have learned reading the press and watching tv.
"Confirmation bias is an area of interest in the teaching of critical thinking as the skill is misused if rigorous critical scrutiny is applied only to evidence challenging a preconceived idea but not to evidence supporting the same preconception.
From Wikipedia.
My brother will get his PhD in a year or two; all he has left is his dissertation (which is quite a bit, from what I hear.)
With all those PHD’s in education you’d think we’d be turning out more scientists and engineers instead burger flippers.
Kinda sets one to thinking...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.