Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Watson: To question genetic intelligence is not racism
October 22, 2007 | James Watson

Posted on 10/22/2007 11:22:56 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Edited on 10/22/2007 12:23:03 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

No excerpting because of copyright. The essay is at http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article3075642.ece .

Link


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bellcurve; helixmakemineadouble; iq; jameswatson; science; watson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2007 11:22:56 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Charles Murray stepped into this same territory with "The Bell Curve."

PC trumps truth every time.

2 posted on 10/22/2007 11:35:22 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Isn’t saying that one race has higher or lower intelligence than another the definition of racism?


3 posted on 10/22/2007 11:40:05 AM PDT by Hacklehead (I'm not here to make friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
We don’t know enough about the mechanics of life to stop cancer yet. How does Watson think we know enough about it to explain something as ineffable as intelligence? I think Watson is being incredible naive.
4 posted on 10/22/2007 11:40:35 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

“Isn’t saying that one race has higher or lower intelligence than another the definition of racism?”

Not if there is reason to believe it’s true, on average (and if the original assertion is phrased in terms of averages). I’m a guy and think men are innately more violent than women. Does that make me a sexist or just a realist?


5 posted on 10/22/2007 11:44:49 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

How can reporting the truth, IF it is true, be racist. To use that information, like the fact they have black skin ( that’s scientific ) to oppress is the definition of racism.


6 posted on 10/22/2007 11:52:55 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
Isn’t saying that one race has higher or lower intelligence than another the definition of racism?

A racist would define it that way.

To a racist, EVERYTHING is racism, even merely saying the word "race."

Excepting themselves, of course.

7 posted on 10/22/2007 11:55:06 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Racist or not, it does no one any profit to squelch discussion on the matter. Let him put forth the logical support for his argument, and let those who disagree put for theirs. If it's false, then it's been put to rest, and will not serve to encourage those who would use the censoring of it to further an agenda; if true, then what? Is a Swedish jockey taller than a Chinese basketball player? We still have to judge each other as individuals based on our attitudes and achievements.

There is no logical reason to squash the debate, unless those doing so foolishly believe it might be true and hate themselves for thinking so.
8 posted on 10/22/2007 11:56:58 AM PDT by Lusis ("Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Being violent or not has nothing to do with capabilities. I think that it is amazing that there are those who actually believe that when someone in essence calls black people naturally the dumbest people on Earth (which is the same as calling them the least human people on Earth), black people should just accept that as reality.


9 posted on 10/22/2007 11:57:08 AM PDT by Shade2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610; Constantine XIII; GAB-1955; Constantine XI Palaeologus

Ping! Another thread starting up. Not even Watson believes what he himself reportedly said.


10 posted on 10/22/2007 11:58:20 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

“Isn’t saying that one race has higher or lower intelligence than another the definition of racism?”

Isn’t implying that all are equal, which directly opposes both historical and emperical evidence, the same?


11 posted on 10/22/2007 12:05:25 PM PDT by sasafras (All things evil are cloaked in the word diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Hacklehead

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/racist

Main Entry: rac·ism
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

P.S. (That said, I don’t believe people should not discuss this topic. Open discussion can be beneficial.)


12 posted on 10/22/2007 12:06:18 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

I don’t think so. Saying that a Border Collie dog has a higher intelegence than a German Shep is not racist either. If in fact if it is the truth, it’s the truth. We may not like it but that’s the way it is. Have we gotten to the point that we can’t handle the truth? The only problem today is that our world had gotten smarter and is capable of figuring these things out. It’s a lot like global warming. It it’s not true, are we supposed to just sit back and keep our mouth shut?


13 posted on 10/22/2007 12:15:03 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
Isn’t saying that one race has higher or lower intelligence than another the definition of racism?

Racism is the irrational and/or unfactual hatred and demeaning of another race or people of another race.

By definition then, stating empirical observations is not racist. If there are racial differences on an intelligence test, that is simply an empirical fact. Racism comes from things like saying "Race X is not very intelligent, therefore they should not be allowed to try to do Y, or should not be treated the same as humans from Race Z, etc."

Its not racist to obsere the world. Its racist to say difference must cause us to hate (or do worse).

14 posted on 10/22/2007 12:15:23 PM PDT by Andrew Byler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

PC Egalitarianism: the Liberal’s own Creationism...


15 posted on 10/22/2007 12:17:12 PM PDT by pollwatcher (the liberal mind works like a parachute - drifty and groundless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Indeed. Everyone interested in the thread should read the essay at the link: there is nothing remotely objectionable in what Watson actually says.

The truly insidious thing about political correctness is that you can't even do the serious scientific inquiry testing hypotheses that would - if disproved - shed a more favorable light on the positions the politically correct prefer!

16 posted on 10/22/2007 12:24:43 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
To question genetic intelligence is not racism

No ! it is science !

To state that global warming is science.

No ! it is propaganda.

What group has the highest IQ?

Ashkenazi Jews


17 posted on 10/22/2007 12:27:07 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

As per my post #12, in other words, indeed your definition of “racism” is correct. So, you’re right. However, that doesn’t mean this topic shouldn’t be discussed openly.

Here is the conclusion: Do a study based on groups of people according to social/cultural constructs, and your results will be based on social/cultural influences. And that’s all. Not genetics. Other people here will call us “PC” and try to shout us down, but they have no real evidence to support their theory that “race” genetically determines intelligence.


18 posted on 10/22/2007 12:29:26 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
“Isn’t saying that one race has higher or lower intelligence than another the definition of racism?”

Good question. The answer is "no".

If we empirically discover that one racial group scores lower on certain tests than other racial groups, that is just a statement of fact. If we decide to never hire a member of that low scoring racial group without considering their individual abilities, that's racism.

A given individual may fall anywhere on the bell shaped curve regardless of how his racial group scores "on average". Racism is lumping everyone from a particular race together and making blanket judgments about the group.

19 posted on 10/22/2007 12:48:23 PM PDT by Senator_Blutarski (No good deed goes unpunished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
It depends on who is making the definition. If someone asserted that intelligence among all races is equal(an assertion that has no factual basis), what would that person be? Tolerant? Insane?
20 posted on 10/22/2007 12:50:12 PM PDT by isrul (Lamentations 5:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson