Posted on 09/12/2007 3:42:13 PM PDT by goldstategop
Democrats claim Gen. David Petraeus' report to Congress on the surge was a put-up job with a pre-ordained conclusion. As if their response wasn't.
Democrats yearn for America to be defeated on the battlefield and oppose any use of the military – except when they can find individual malcontents in the military willing to denounce the war and call for a humiliating retreat.
It's been the same naysaying from these people since before we even invaded Iraq – despite the fact that their representatives in Congress voted in favor of that war.
Mark Bowden, author of "Black Hawk Down," warned Americans in the Aug. 30, 2002, Los Angeles Times of 60,000 to 100,000 dead American troops if we invaded Iraq – comparing an Iraq war to Vietnam and a Russian battle in Chechnya. He said Iraqis would fight the Americans "tenaciously" and raised the prospect of Saddam using weapons of mass destruction against our troops, an attack on Israel "and possibly in the United States."
On Sept. 14, 2002, the New York Times' Frank Rich warned of another al-Qaida attack in the U.S. if we invaded Iraq, noting that since "major al-Qaida attacks are planned well in advance and have historically been separated by intervals of 12 to 24 months, we will find out how much we've been distracted soon enough."
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Oh, let's not quibble. Liberals are really stupid and traitorous.
“they knew what Petraeus was going to say.”
They knew that Petraeus was going to say that it’s working. How did they know that? Because it IS working.
I’m wondering about protocol. When someone is being consistently verbally battered and disrespected while testifying in front of this group, is he/she able to walk out and come back when the clowns agree to behave themselves?
Nobody in positions such as Petraeus, Condoleezza Rice, Roberts, etc., should have to be disrespected in this way. (IMO)
Actually, American liberals are really stupid traitors.
Um... RULES FOLKS...RULES!!!
No, unfortunately, they have to sit their and take it.
You don’t get Peace when you surrender, you get defeat, and you deserve it. What is the French word for Democrat?
Guess as long as there is an America there will always be a block of people who believe in Isolationism at any cost. They would sit idly by regardless of what any brutal dictator is doing, or whether there is genocide anywhere in the world, or even if it meant that this country could be overrun by barbarous maniacs. They think only in terms of civil liberties and Freedom and are selfish in their fantasies as long as they are left alone..Life means nothing to them,nor does Humanity..ironic since most of them say they are bleeding hearts and bash those who defend their very Freedoms.....Isolationists/Democrats/socialists—they are shameless traitors...
You mean like Ron Paul?
From The Halls Of Malibu To The Shores Of Kennedy
(Ann Coulter On Dems NO On Iraq Alert)
Posted by goldstategop
On News/Activism 09/12/2007 3:42:13 PM PDT · 11 replies · 588+ views
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 09/12/2007 | Ann Coulter
FROM THE HALLS OF MALIBU TO THE SHORES OF KENNEDY ... Ann Coulter
Posted by Rummyfan
On News/Activism 09/12/2007 3:03:27 PM PDT · 20 replies · 1,001+ views
Ann Culter Dot Com ^ | 12 September 2007 | Ann Coulter
:o)
Why would anyone listen to democrats ,they have been wrong as Ann Says for years .Ann Coulter can look it up and blast it why cant the Republicans do the same! What the hell are they afraid of
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.