Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not even Harry Potter?
1 posted on 08/21/2007 2:24:56 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: Nachum

Four books would be a slow two weeks for me.


2 posted on 08/21/2007 2:26:18 PM PDT by Xenalyte (Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It seems amazing, but I do sometimes cross paths with people who don’t read.


3 posted on 08/21/2007 2:27:55 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Private pay or private charity - live it, learn it, love it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
"Fiction just doesn't interest me," said Bob Ryan, 41, who works for a construction company in Guntersville, Ala. "If I'm going to get a story, I'll get a movie."

That quote pretty much says it all, I suppose. I prefer to let my own mind design characters when I read. When I read a book and then see the movie, 9 times out of 10 they aren't even close to how it all appeared and unraveled in my head.

I love to read. I have read 4 books in the last month at least. I wish I could read more, but I simply don't have the time.
5 posted on 08/21/2007 2:31:23 PM PDT by USMCWife6869 (Godspeed Sand Sharks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It’s going to get worse. My daughter was in a ballet program for five weeks this summer. She was the only reader in her “suite.” The rest of the girls (13-14) hated reading. When she got her copy of Harry Potter, the girls all thought she was a child prodigy because she finished her book within 24 hours of getting it. And she did attend class that day! One had an assignment to read 1000 pages, and moaned about it. And they all had no interest in LOTR, and one had only seen the movies of Harry, and had never read the books!

The next generation will not have a majority of readers.


8 posted on 08/21/2007 2:34:09 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publici scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Doesnt surprise me...people are stoopider now more than ever.

I give 50 books away each year.


9 posted on 08/21/2007 2:35:34 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What did this article say? Can someone summarize in a couple words? I think I’ll wait for the movie.


10 posted on 08/21/2007 2:38:02 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I completed the six volume set of Winston Churchills “The Second World War”
they were a tough read but well worth it
took me almost a year to accomplish. i then read two more books in short order so i guess i am ahead of the curve


11 posted on 08/21/2007 2:38:51 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
"Fiction just doesn't interest me," said Bob Ryan, 41, who works for a construction company in Guntersville, Ala. "If I'm going to get a story, I'll get a movie."

That's what my boss says. And I also have known folks who say, "I'm done with school. Why would I want to read if I don't have to?"

Personally, I can't understand either sentiment. I always have at least one book that I'm currently reading - both fiction and nonfiction. I wouldn't know how to function any other way.

15 posted on 08/21/2007 2:41:31 PM PDT by RosieCotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The only books I read last year were a 1911 shop manual and a 1911A1 shop manual.


17 posted on 08/21/2007 2:42:04 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Sad to say, books are now a luxury item.


19 posted on 08/21/2007 2:44:13 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
I love to read. But not fiction. I’m surprised that the number of people who read no books last year isn’t higher.
21 posted on 08/21/2007 2:44:23 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Why should I read Herodotus when I can see the movie “300” instead?

Sarc /off


25 posted on 08/21/2007 2:45:38 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Ever see WILLIS SHAW backwards in your rear view mirror? I have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Here’s the excuse needed to make even more Harry Potter books!


27 posted on 08/21/2007 2:46:47 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I only read one boom last year and I may not read one this year. Who has time to read? I get all the information I need from Free Republic :)


28 posted on 08/21/2007 2:47:29 PM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

“One in four adults say they read no books at all in the past year”

I think that most people lie a lot. I’d be surprised if one in four average Americans read a book last year, if you exclude comic books.


29 posted on 08/21/2007 2:47:38 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I read about 100 books a year, but then, I’m a stay at home mom, a quick reader (100 pages+ an hour) and I don’t watch telly. My husband likes to read, but his brain gets so overworked at his job, he deserves the downtime he gets in front of the t.v. He reads on his vacation, or on the plane when he’s on business trips. This puts him firmly in the 4 books a year category, not counting the thousands of pages of documents he reads (and writes) for his work.

Literacy is not dead. It’s just exhausted.


30 posted on 08/21/2007 2:48:06 PM PDT by Eepsy (The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

David Putty.


34 posted on 08/21/2007 2:52:53 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

History, historical fiction, technical, occasional sci-fi/fantasy, the odd classic for it’s own sake, here and there. I have less time than I used to to devote to it, but I still call myself a voracious reader.

I usually have several books going at one time. I cannot understand why people don’t read more. I developed the habit when I was a youngster, going through some difficult circumstances. It was my bound, rectangular ‘escape hatch’.


45 posted on 08/21/2007 3:05:29 PM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Well, there's "reading" and there's "READING." More and more people surf their way through books. They read a little to get the general idea, then drop it or skip through the pages to find out what happens.

I miss the old-fashioned linear "READING" but if it's a choice between living wholly without books and having to read carefully through page after page to the end, I don't know which I'd choose (scary thought).

One of the things about going to college to learn how to "REALLY READ" is that it gets to be such a chore after a while one stops bothering.

51 posted on 08/21/2007 3:12:21 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum


I don't read books. I burn them.
57 posted on 08/21/2007 3:22:48 PM PDT by macamadamia (I reject your reality, but here's a Necco Wafer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson