Posted on 08/13/2007 8:23:51 PM PDT by blam
Sprawling Angkor Brought Down By Overpopulation, Study Suggests
Susan Brown
for National Geographic News
August 13, 2007
Cambodia's long-lost temple complex of Angkor is the world's largest known preindustrial settlement, reveals a new radar study that found 74 new temples and more than a thousand manmade ponds at the site. But urban sprawl and its associated environmental devastation may have led to the collapse of the kingdom, which includes the renowned temple of Angkor Wat, the study suggests.
Ever since the late 16th century, when Portuguese traders spied the towers of the monument poking through a dense canopy of trees, people have puzzled over the demise of the Angkor civilization.
Now a new archaeological map created using jungle-penetrating radar has revealed traces of vast suburban sprawl surrounding the many temples and the walled central city of Angkor Thom.
Extensive waterworks threaded through the low-density development, channeling the flow of three rivers through agricultural fields, homes, and local temples.
In the end, residents of greater Angkor likely struggled with the ecological consequences of transforming the landscape.
The new survey found breached spillways and canals clogged with silt, suggesting that environmental degradation made the infrastructure increasingly difficult to maintain.
Mystery Civilization
The Khmer kingdom of Angkor rose in the ninth century A.D. and thrived for 600 years before its leaders left to resettle near the modern Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh.
The civilization is renowned to this day for building the massive temple of Angkor Wat—often called the world's largest single religious monument—in the early 12th century.
Although the kings of Angkor etched into stone such significant moments in their history, they left no message during the settlement's decline. That mysterious departure has fueled a smoldering controversy among archaeologists.
Until recently, warfare and changing religion were the prime suspects, according to anthropologist Charles Higham of the University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand. Higham's own work has unearthed evidence into the origins of Angkor. Invaders from Thailand sacked central Angkor Tom in 1453, Higham noted. And religious affiliations shifted from a form of Buddhism that recognized earthly deities to one that did not.
"The great lumpen proletariat ceased to believe in the divinity of the king, another reason the social fabric of Angkor began to change," Higham said.
Another possibility is that overexploitation, overpopulation, and deforestation overwhelmed a fragile monsoon habitat, Higham added.
Archaeologist Bernard-Phillipe Groslier of the French Research School of the Far East (EFEO) first proposed the environmental-downfall theory nearly 30 years ago.
But his institution's efforts concentrated on preserving the fallen monuments, and Cambodia's then civil war—and the grim reign of the Khmer Rouge—shuttered the school.
For decades conflict and strife precluded work in the area. Even now, land mines litter the northern reaches of Angkor.
Sprawling City
But in 1992 archaeologist Christophe Pottier reopened EFEO and began surveying the surrounding region by motorbike, using aerial photographs and earlier radar images to guide his exploration.
Most recently the Greater Angkor Project commissioned a series of radar images from NASA with much finer resolution, which archaeologist Damian Evans of the University of Sydney combined with maps Pottier had compiled.
The new archaeological map reveals medieval suburbs spreading from the shores of Cambodia's Tonle Sap to the Kulen highlands to the north (see a map of Cambodia).
At more than 3,000 square kilometers (1,160 square miles) it is the largest settlement ever found from the preindustrial world, the authors say.
"The scale is really unlike anything else," said archaeologist William Saturno of Boston University, noting that it dwarfs the large Mesoamerican cities that are the subject of his own work. (Related: "Oldest Intact Maya Mural Found in Guatemala" [March 22, 2002].)
The people who built greater Angkor were accomplished civil engineers, he added.
"It's amazing the amount of earth they moved."
Rectangular embankments enclosed artificial ponds and probable rice paddies, while earthen mounds lifted houses to avoid seasonal floods.
The waterworks also diverted water from the Puok, Roluos, and Siem Reap rivers to reservoirs that could be drained to irrigate crops or filled to dampen extreme flooding, Evans's team reports in the Proceedings of the National Academy this week.
Unsustainable Development
The scientists also found evidence that the system had become overwhelmed by the time Angkor met its downfall.
A breached spillway, for example, was filled with blocks from walls that had tumbled down or were possibly pushed into the channel and buried in sand. And thick layers of sediment dropped by churning floodwaters fill some of the canals.
"Something went terribly wrong," Evans said.
As Angkor's growing population expanded, they must have cleared forests for agricultural fields, which may have led to erosion and flooding, the study authors speculate.
But no one can say for sure whether the collapse of the waterworks helped precipitate the Khmers' departure or followed the site's abandonment and neglect.
As land mines are cleared from the region, archaeologists are moving in to excavate the structures and date pollen grains found within the sediments in an attempt to solve the puzzle.
Me, I think the HOA dues got too high.
This is really amazing...
Thanks.
His conclusions seem to be driven by left-wing environmentalist ideology. I hope he isn’t trying to fit the facts to the theory.
“Something went terribly wrong,” Evans said.
Thats about all they know. I’d say some things (plural), not something.
How about earthquake(s).....tsunami......monster storm(s).......or any combination or succession of these?
but it’s gotta be man abusing or being stupid about the environment, always.
I thought the same thing - they find a channel filled with silt and whoa - it was an environmental disaster!
I am sure that is what he's doing. Big chunks of China would be arid deserts without irrigation (i.e. waterworks that divert rivers to provide water for farmland). But thanks to the wonders of Chinese engineering, Chinese cities have been populated for thousands of years by ever-increasing populations. My feeling is that Angkor Wat was established based on the presence of some resource, like a lot of our mining towns, and went away after that resource was depleted.
REVEALED: Australia’s raiders of the lost wat
Canberra Times | 14 August 2007 | Rosslyn Beeby
Posted on 08/13/2007 7:55:10 PM EDT by BlackVeil
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1880693/posts
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
It was climate change that emptied the city. Also, it was Bush’s fault.
More liberal bias. I’m suprised they didn’t blame global warming, and the lack of free healthcare, abortion on demand, and gun control.
I thought Pol Pot took care of the the over population problem some time ago.
Anthhropology has answers for everything. Too bad they (the answers) are shallow, shortsighted and are fragments of knee-jerk propaganda.
But no one can say for sure whether the collapse of the waterworks helped precipitate the Khmers' departure or followed the site's abandonment and neglect.
Indeed, all of the 'evidence' cited here is completely consistent with abandonment of the site & doesn't in & of itself suggest a causal relationship. That salient line casually tossed out at the article's end kinda betrays the hubris of the as-yet-unsubstantiated & prematurely speculative claim up in the header, doesn't it?
Anyway, here's another article on this from this morning's LA Times, which I thought might be helpful to link this thread to since it is a little bit clearer that researchers aren't yet in a position to draw any valid conclusions about Angkor's decline:
"We're going now and excavating [the sites] on the ground, and trying to get a grip on when they happened -- whether they were a precursor of the decline, a symptom or the system gradually falling into ruin after they left," [Damian Evans, lead author of the NAS paper] said."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.