Posted on 02/04/2007 4:50:17 PM PST by xcamel
** Board shoots down BLM leasing of 14,000 acres on sensitive lands
Environmentalists have won another round in challenging a series of Bureau of Land Management oil and gas lease sales in Utah.
The Interior Department's Board of Land Appeals this week reversed the BLM's leasing of roughly 14,000 acres for energy development north of Nine Mile Canyon and just south of the Book Cliffs in central Utah. The leases, covering 16 parcels, have been suspended, effective immediately.
The agency, the board ruled, failed to adequately identify sensitive archaeological sites before offering the lease parcels for sale in October 2003. In granting the leases, the agency rejected protests from the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which charged that selling the parcels without an adequate review violated requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act. The board agreed, determining that the BLM's Vernal and Moab field offices fell short in properly consulting with affected American Indian tribes.
"There is really no record that the BLM engaged in meaningful negotiations with the tribes, which have a demonstrable interest in these parcels, and no sign the BLM adequately investigated cultural sites which would have been threatened," SUWA attorney Steve Bloch said Thursday.
"This is the latest in a steady drumbeat of decisions which clearly show that the Utah BLM has followed an illegal 'lease first and think later' approach to issuing these leases."
Last summer, U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball overturned leases sold by the BLM in November 2003; the Interior Board of Land Appeals also has previously reversed the agency on leases sold between 2004 and last year.
Terry Catlin, the Utah BLM's energy team leader, acknowledged that the agency probably was too lax in approving some energy leases where cultural resources have come into play. But she maintains that the BLM has tightened things up considerably since 2003. "Our standard is now a lot higher," she said. "SUWA has other cases pending [against the BLM], but they have also filed to exclude [the National Historic Preservation Act] as a cause of action. To me that indicates that even our critics are more comfortable now with how we're handling this.
"We protected the resource," she added, "but we were probably sloppy in our documentation. And that doesn't hold up in court." Catlin said making things easier in this instance is that none of the leases are in production. They will remain suspended pending the outcome of an agency review. Bloch said SUWA wants something more permanent. "We think the leases actually need to be terminated, and we're going to pursue that," he said.
GGG ping
Its not an either/or situation.
It shouldn't be an either or thing but it is.
This is the sort of thing that I had hoped a GWB administration could be able to modify.
Apparently not.
Interesting name: coyoteman. Has a lot of meaning for Native Americans, especially in Arizona.
BTAIM: Everyone needs to make sacrafices if we are to have energy independence and not become overrun. Even in Utah.
Nice snow this year, by the way, just got back.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Nam Vet
P.S. Can you tell I don't play well with those anywhere left of Atilla?
Nam Vet
"A past is a wonderful thing for stories, but you have to have a future to tell them."
Thanks for the kind remarks and for joining the list. There will be our standard welcome message in your FReepmail box, and between the two lists (indiv and digest) there are 652 members now, not bad.
bnelson44: Everyone needs to make sacrafices if we are to have energy independence and not become overrun. Even in Utah.
You can exploit the oil with directional drilling. Its a pretty standard technique and in an area that small it should not seriously impact the oil supply.
Cultural resources are non-renewable. When they are gone, they are gone. If the area contains significant cultural resources, wouldn't examining the area make sense? Finding out what resources are there and where they are, and what their legal and cultural significance may be?
And yes, Coyote is an important figure for a lot of Native American groups.
I have no problem with that. I agree cultural resources are important. As long as we are not talking about holding up obtaining the resources for decades. Compared to some other mining that happened in the Southwest, drilling for oil is really not that disturbing.
And yes, Coyote is an important figure for a lot of Native American groups.
Thank you for taking that in the spirit it was intended.
It seems as if yoưnderstand the priorities of the ecoids pretty well; archaeology is not at the top.
the cultural loss would be great, however i believe the bigger problem is that the blm tried to get rid of land without going through the proper steps. as a government held land, the blm should have had the sites properly surveyed prior to leasing or selling. In my opinion they broke the law without have the surveys done. i am not saying that post survey that they cant raze the whole area but the law is the law. change the law then do it a different way
who knows, they might find something cool
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.