Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Americans Arrived Recently, Settled Pacific Coast, DNA Study Says
National Geographic ^ | 2-2-2007 | Stefan Lovgren

Posted on 02/02/2007 4:52:13 PM PST by blam

First Americans Arrived Recently, Settled Pacific Coast, DNA Study Says

Stefan Lovgren
for National Geographic News

February 2, 2007

A study of the oldest known sample of human DNA in the Americas suggests that humans arrived in the New World relatively recently, around 15,000 years ago.

The DNA was extracted from a 10,300-year-old tooth found in a cave on Prince of Wales Island off southern Alaska in 1996.

The sample represents a previously unknown lineage for the people who first arrived in the Americas.

The findings, published last week in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, shed light on how the descendants of the Alaskan caveman might have spread.

Comparing the DNA found in the tooth with that sampled from 3,500 Native Americans, researchers discovered that only one percent of modern tribal members have genetic patterns that matched the prehistoric sample.

Those who did lived primarily on the Pacific coast of North and South America, from California to Tierra del Fuego at the southernmost tip of South America (see map).

This suggests that the first Americans may have spread through the New World along a coastal route.

Brian Kemp, a molecular anthropologist who sequenced the DNA, said the discovery underlines the importance of genetic research in understanding human migration.

"I think there's a lot of information in these old skeletons that's going to help us clarify the timing of the peopling of the Americas and perhaps where Native Americans originated in Asia," said Kemp, a Ph.D. candidate at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee.

On Your Knees Cave

When and how the first people came to the Americas has been a subject of intense debate.

The prevailing theory has been that the first to arrive descended from prehistoric hunters who walked across a thousand-mile (1,600-kilometer) land bridge from Asia to Alaska. This migration probably occurred at least 15,000 years ago—the oldest human remains discovered so far are 13,000 years old—but some scientists have proposed that the first Americans arrived up to 40,000 years ago.

The Alaskan tooth was discovered in a cavern called On Your Knees Cave, named by the explorer who first crawled inside it.

Using material taken from the tooth, Kemp isolated fragments of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is passed down from mothers to their offspring, and Y chromosome DNA, which is passed from father to son.

From a genetic database of 3,500 Native Americans, Kemp found 47 individuals in North and South America who exhibited the same genetic markers as the caveman. Some of the samples were drawn from living people and others from ancient bones.

He then compared the tooth DNA with the matching, modern samples and tracked the mutations that had occurred in that DNA over time.

By measuring the rate of mutation, Kemp found that so-called molecular evolution—the process by which genetic material changes over time—had taken place two to four times faster than researchers believed mtDNA could evolve.

That, Kemp said, suggests people entered the Americas within the last 15,000 years, because the DNA has evolved too fast for the arrival to have occurred any earlier.

"I would say that humans were probably not here much before that date," said Kemp. "A 15,000-year-old entry is [also] much more consistent with the archaeological record."

Genetic Markers

All of the mtDNA lineages among Native Americans are associated with five founding lineages believed to have originated in Asia.

But the caveman DNA turned out to be an independent founding lineage.

Of the 47 samples that matched the tooth DNA, 4 were from descendants of Chumash Indians living along California's central coast.

"The distribution of people exhibiting this [genetic] type today are all distributed in the western Americas," Kemp said.

"More or less the individuals are smack down the coast. It's a very neat western distribution."

John Johnson, an archaeologist and ethnohistorian at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History in California, collected the Chumash DNA samples.

To Johnson, the matching of the Chumash samples to the On Your Knees Cave man is indirect evidence of an ancient coastal migration that may have occurred very rapidly.

"We're interested in who were those first people to arrive here at the Pacific coast," Johnson said.

"I believe the Chumash descended from a very early coastal migration that resulted in the distribution of people down to the tip of South America."

Fishing Cultures?

But where did these coastal migrants come from?

DNA samples of people living in Japan and northeast Asia show some of the genetic mutations found in the cave-tooth and Chumash samples.

"I think that's a clue that there could be a genetic connection," Johnson said.

He said the Chumash descendants may have been skilled fishers before they arrived in the Americas.

"Your techniques for exploiting coastal resources are easily [transferable] and something that maybe can allow you to migrate more quickly than people who are hunters and gatherers, who must get used to new environments as they move into uncharted territory," Johnson said.

"I think that may have allowed a more rapid migration along the Pacific margins of the Americas."

Kemp, meanwhile, said rapidly advancing DNA technology will help scientists piece together the story of the first Americans.

"No expert in morphology could look at the bones and say this person resembles a Tierra del Fuego person. It was only the DNA that could seal the case," Kemp said.

"This really highlights the importance of adding a molecular component to the study of these really ancient remains."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americans; dna; emptydna; first; gigo; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; mtdna; nagpra; newworld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2007 4:52:14 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 02/02/2007 4:52:38 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A study of the oldest known sample of human DNA in the Americas suggests that humans arrived in the New World relatively recently, around 15,000 years ago.

The report fails to reveal they came through the porous Mexican border.
3 posted on 02/02/2007 4:55:13 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

bookmark


4 posted on 02/02/2007 4:55:44 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

So, by one tooth they have this "great epiphany" ??


5 posted on 02/02/2007 4:56:47 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
A study of the oldest known sample of human DNA in the Americas suggests that humans arrived in the New World relatively recently, around 15,000 years ago.

Finally, a clue as to the identity of the schmuck that started glo-bull warming.

6 posted on 02/02/2007 4:58:35 PM PST by LasVegasMac (Islam........not fit for human consumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
"So, by one tooth they have this "great epiphany" ??"

I don't think they have enough data to make such a conclusive decision.

7 posted on 02/02/2007 4:58:43 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

NG has a really bad habbit of seeing the entire world in any old grain of sand


8 posted on 02/02/2007 5:02:27 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Unless I'm missing something, it seems as if this represents one group of early Americans, not necessarily the first.


9 posted on 02/02/2007 5:02:41 PM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
So, by one tooth they have this "great epiphany" ??

It so happens that teeth are excellent places in which to preserve mtDNA.

ps. I have a similar sample, dated to 5300 years ago, that shows the same pattern of coastal migration discussed in the article. Its a different haplogroup though! And it also was from a tooth.

10 posted on 02/02/2007 5:06:20 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

"What's a Geico?"
11 posted on 02/02/2007 5:11:33 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
Atlas Of The Human Journey

Go to this site and click on Genetic Markers, quite interesting. They also map the haplogroup A and say it originated about 50k years ago.

12 posted on 02/02/2007 5:15:14 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
I find it interesting that Cheddar Man(UK) is in the same ,U5, haplogroup as the Sa'ami.
13 posted on 02/02/2007 5:19:31 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam
Some of the details need updating already. Things are moving very rapidly now in this field.

Here is a good graphic of the mtDNA data from this article. This is the On Your Knees Cave lineage:

See also this article from a couple of years ago:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050824/news_lz1c24tooth.html.

14 posted on 02/02/2007 5:23:25 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

I don't think they have enough data to make such a conclusive decision.

btt


15 posted on 02/02/2007 5:25:37 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'm really confused by the article:
Either the rate of mutation was much faster than generally accepted, OR, the author is stuck on a 15,000 year time line and assumes that it is evolution/mutation that varied (greatly) and not his concept of when the human record bagan in the Americas.
The rest of the piece seems merely to brag about the importance of his line of inquiry.
When the results are perfectly ambiguous, I'm not too sure about the value of the inquiry.

Wrong?

16 posted on 02/02/2007 6:02:04 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton
"I'm really confused by the article:"

Click on the link provided by Coyoteman in post #14...maybe that article will help.

17 posted on 02/02/2007 6:16:52 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
NG has a really bad habbit of seeing the entire world in any old grain of sand

LOL! Could not agree more. The magazine's been laughable since it got into the environmental/political correctness/global warming business. I canceled my subscription years ago.

18 posted on 02/02/2007 6:19:00 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Yeah, makes you wonder, doesn't it???


19 posted on 02/02/2007 6:24:53 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

This makes sense. They liked the west coast, surfing, the parties on the beach, the laid-back lifestyle. Why cross mountains and deserts to get to where? Tornado Alley?


20 posted on 02/02/2007 6:31:44 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson