Posted on 12/20/2006 12:18:11 PM PST by Man of the Right
President Bush says the U.S. needs to increase the size of Army and Marines, and says strategy and tactics in Iraq will change to meet the situation on the ground. Bush also said Wednesday that insurgents in Iraq thwarted U.S. efforts at "establishing security and stability throughout the country" in 2006. At a year-end news conference, Bush said the United States will "ask more of our Iraqi partners" in 2007, and he pledged to work with the new Democratic Congress, as well.
Bush sidestepped one question _ whether he would order a so-called surge of troops in Iraq as a first-step toward gaining control of the violent and chaotic situation there. "Nice try," he told a reporter who asked about his plans.
The Baker-Hamilton Commission recommended a quick buildup of troops as part of an overall plan to arrest what it called a "grave and deteriorating" situation in Iraq.
Bush also said the United States supports the creation of a unity government in Iraq.
The president opened the question-and-answer session by conceding the obvious _ things haven't gone well in Iraq, where the United States has lost more than 2,900 troops in almost four years of war, without quelling the insurgency.
"The enemies of liberty ... carried out a deliberate strategy to foment sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shia. And over the course of the year they had success," he said.
"Their success hurt our efforts to help the Iraqis rebuild their country. They set back reconciliation and kept Iraq's unity government and our coalition from establishing security and stability throughout the country."
Bush also explained a striking shift in position _ his statement on Tuesday that the United States is neither winning nor losing in Iraq, contrasted with his insistence at a recent news conference that it was "absolutely winning."
He said his earlier comments were meant to say that, "I believe that we're going to win, I believe that ... My comments yesterday reflected the fact that we're not succeeding nearly as fast as I had wanted."
Bush was asked whether he was like Lyndon Johnson, who had difficulty sleeping during the difficult days of the Vietnam War.
In response, the president said it was difficult knowing that "my decisions have caused young men and women to lose their lives." And yet, he said, the United States must prevail in the global war on terror _ and will.
It "is the calling of our generation," he said.
Most of the questions dealt with the war in Iraq, but he was also asked about the pregnancy of Mary Cheney, the openly gay daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney.
"I know Mary and I like her and I know she is going to be a fine, loving mother," said Bush. Neither he nor his questioner referred to Cheney's partner.
He said the same thing in 2000 and got lambasted by the Left.
The problem is deeper than that. It's an issue of rotation. You hope to have 1/3 in the fight, 1/3 just back and refitting, and 1/3 training up to go in again. We're running into a situation where units don't have the equipment to train because it's broken awaiting repair or in use over there. That's what the military leadership is talking about when they say that the military is nearly 'broken'. Over 5 years after 9/11 and nearly 4 years after invading Iraq blame for the present size and constitution of our military lies squarely with the GOP Congress and White House. This war was sold as something that could be done on the cheap (and that's a damn relative term), and that's just not bearing out. Instead we have GOP Congressmen fighting tooth and nail to keep their earmarks while hundreds of Abrams and Bradleys sit awaiting funds to make repairs and rejoin the fight. It should be clear, the GOP lost it's way, and didn't lose the Congress by accident.
69,000 in Germany; 33,000 in South Korea. I'll leave it up to somebody above my pay grade to decide whether troops are needed to deter the Russians and North Koreans, respectively. Both Eastern Europe and South Korea are more important to the U.S. than Iraq is.
On a personal level, I think it's about time they take over the responsibility on their own.
They will if they want to stay in power for more than two years. (Hopefully, it won't do them any good though).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.