Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11 Panel Members Weren’t Told of Meeting
NY Times ^

Posted on 10/01/2006 6:32:15 PM PDT by indianrightwinger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: indianrightwinger

“None of this was shared with us in hours of private interviews, including interviews under oath, nor do we have any paper on this,” said Timothy J. Roemer, a Democratic member of the commission and a former House member from Indiana. “I’m deeply disturbed by this. I’m furious.”

Another Democratic commissioner, former Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste, said that the staff of the Sept. 11 commission was polled in recent days on the disclosures in Mr. Woodward’s book and agreed that the meeting “was never mentioned to us.”

“This is certainly something we would have wanted to know about,” he said, referring to the July 10, 2001, meeting.

******


That's not all that wasn't shared with the "commission" you MORONS and you know it since you had one of the main people responsible for 9/11 sitting on the "commission".


41 posted on 10/01/2006 7:17:31 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks for the link.


42 posted on 10/01/2006 7:19:47 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Good point...isn't it interesting that Bob Woodward never said ANYTHING about this supposed meeting until the days before an election, when CFR has gone into play and efforts to challenge his account in the media are limited???


43 posted on 10/01/2006 7:20:17 PM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

hahah
exactly...if Tenet had actually said this, don't ya think he would have told the 9/11 commission????? Especially since it would have put him in a position to lay the blame at Bush and Rice's feet??? Come on now!


44 posted on 10/01/2006 7:21:52 PM PDT by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
"It seems to me that someone would have brought this up before the 9/11 commission."

Do you think the so called "9/11 commission" was formed to find out what really happened on 9/11? First they try to put Kisssinger in charge then they find people like Gorecki who was directly involved...... LMAO!

45 posted on 10/01/2006 7:24:10 PM PDT by patriot_wes (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - may they prosper who love thee...Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
You forgot to post the

Barf Alert!

46 posted on 10/01/2006 7:43:40 PM PDT by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Hey Bob! Listen to this!

47 posted on 10/01/2006 7:51:43 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshhiggins
I have an anonymous source that tells me Woodward pull this out of his ....

AS a matter of fact:
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
48 posted on 10/01/2006 8:13:04 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
Members of the Sept. 11 commission said today that they were alarmed that they were told nothing about a White House meeting in July 2001 at which George J. Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, is reported to have warned Condoleezza Rice, then the national security adviser, about an imminent Al Qaeda attack and failed to persuade her to take action.

Where was the attack to be? When? I can say that there is going to be an imminent attack by al Qaeda and probably be right too.

49 posted on 10/01/2006 8:33:46 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Those that do not heed the warnings of history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

I am so sick of the lies just to get the 'power' back...


50 posted on 10/01/2006 8:35:56 PM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

"They should bring Woodward in and make him give sworn testimony about all these new revelations. On penalty of perjury"

You expect this from an administration who let Sandy Burglar off with a wrist slap when caught stuffing top secret documents down his pants.

From an administration who still hasn't fired all the Clintonista's still undermining his administration?

I guess u can dream about it. But don't hold your breath.


51 posted on 10/01/2006 8:37:38 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Let's be honest here. This is ass-covering of the worst sort by an agency determined to hurt the President. It is worth noting that Tenet got to meet with the President every day. Further, it's worth noting that the CIA has been running a covert operation against this president for four years.

Be Seeing You,

Chris


52 posted on 10/01/2006 8:42:22 PM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: section9

"Further, it's worth noting that the CIA has been running a covert operation against this president for four years"

And who do you think has the power to get rid of these Clintonista's still undermining this administration?

The tooth fairy? Blame the people WHO ALLOW THIS TO CONTINUE.


53 posted on 10/01/2006 8:45:10 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

I haven't read Woodward's book. Does he name his source for this? or give a general description like "a senior State Department official"?


54 posted on 10/01/2006 8:53:53 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
What needs to be done is to have the '9/11 commission report' shredded and a new panel [minus Gorelick] investigate from scratch. Gorelick should also be put on the stand under oath and asked about the coverup she did and explain all her lies about the 'Wall'.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004956

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1120934/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1126434/posts
55 posted on 10/01/2006 9:18:51 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
What a lying pile of crap:

On June 23, both the FAA and the State Department issue terrorist warnings. State ordered all diplomatic posts to set up emergency action committees to deal with the threat of terrorist attacks. The CIA speculated that the most probable targets are in Europe. The State Department, the FAA, and the FBI will issue a total of eight separate warnings between June 22 and August 1. ----Washington Post!!!! YOUR OWN DONKEY NEWSPAPER, Bob WoodHEAD!, May.17.2002

On June 26, intelligence agencies inform the White House of a spike in terrorist communications about a possible strike on July 4. Both the State Department and the Pentagon issue more terrorist alerts. ----CHICAGO TRIBUNE reported the Navy ordered all ships in the Middle East OUT OF PORT ASAP.

According to the WASHINGTON DINGBAT POST WHICH HIRES HAS-BEEN LAZY BUTTS, a June 28 intelligence summary for National Security Adviser Rice states “It is highly likely a significant al-Qaeda attack is in the near future, within several weeks. THIS WAS WIDELY REPORTED AT THE TIME!!!!!!!!! --Usually between pages 8 and 37, depending upon the degree of incompetence of the local editors.

----But the Americann Poodle Press was focused like a laser beam on Gary Condit's escapades and the dire threat to humanity posed by sand sharks in Florida.

56 posted on 10/01/2006 9:28:38 PM PDT by cookcounty (Army vet, Army dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

President Bush couldn't get rid of the Clinton leftover's. Clinton saw to that right before he left office by making them all Civil Servants.


57 posted on 10/01/2006 9:34:09 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Before his term was over, Bill Clintoon signed a presidential directive making all of his political appointees civil servants. Impossible to fire, BTW. So how is this Bush's fault?


58 posted on 10/01/2006 9:34:39 PM PDT by IrishRainy (The only way BJ Clinton would have nailed bin Laden is if Ossama had been a White House intern.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

In the report, Tenet and his counter terrorism guy Black are mentioned as sources to Woodward's book.


59 posted on 10/01/2006 9:39:58 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

A little homework for you.

(Clinton) Holdovers in addition to Clarke) Held Up Security Strategy

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1107711/posts


60 posted on 10/01/2006 9:53:45 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson