Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 16 July 2006

Various big media television networks ^ | 16 July 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

[Alas Babylon!]

The Talk Shows

Sunday, July 16th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice; Sens. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and George Allen, R-Va.; Philippe Cousteau, president of Earth Echo International.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del.; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich; columnist Robert Novak.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Rice; Richard Haass, Council on Foreign Relations president; Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Rice; Madeleine Albright, former secretary of state; Kerri Strug, Olympic gold medalist in gymnastics.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : White House counselor Dan Bartlett; Israeli Vice Premier Shimon Peres; Imad Moustapha, Syrian ambassador to the U.S.; Sens. Trent Lott, R-Miss., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Mouwafak al-Rubaie, Iraqi national security adviser; Pakistani Foreign Minister Khursheed Kasuri; space shuttle astronauts.

[samantha]

#351, good point, they seem to remember less and less even when they are reminded, they shrug it off. Liberalism causes loss of IQ, and it is more evident every day.

[MNJohnnie]

How do you think we traced the dots back to Al Qeda so quickly after 9-11? Forensically there would be no way to cover up such an attack well enough to not leave a trail of bread crumbs leading back to the state sponsor. It makes for great fiction, it not real world.

[cardinal4]

Just got home from work where I heard a blurb about Jan Harman. Was she really trying spin the Israeli War as Bush's fault?

[YaYa123]

want another laugh?

a few minutes ago I heard MSNBC Alex Whitt promo the NBC exclusive interview with Lebanon's Prime Minister. flipped over a bit later, and Wolf Blitzer on CNN is interviewing him. somebody let me know if FOXNews gets an "exclusive" interview too.

[Phsstpok]

sign your son up for one of the wireless broadband services. They are spreading across the country at an incredibly rapid pace, much faster than I expected. It gets you cable modem speed in many instances. Dell is selling laptops with it built in and there are adapter cards for other laptops that don't offer it built in.

I want one of the Ultra Mobile PCs when they come out with the second generation using the new Intel ultra low power processors. It promises always connected high speed with many hours of continuous operation. These are things with a 7" screen and no keyboard built in. Perfect for road warriors (particularly ones like me with eyes that aren't good enough to see the little screens on the cell phone devices)

[snugs]

Thanks Samantha and from you I value that comment even more.

[Phsstpok]

Did any of these Peabrain Dinosaurs mention that this is exactly why we needed to get rid of Saddamn. Imagine what this would look like if we still thought he had WMD to put in his missles and fire them at Israel. Does any of the Stone-age press not believe he would be in the thick of this and escalating it??

He did have WMD that could be put into a missile warhead.  At least 500 chemical artillary sheels that we know of, which I imagine could be adapted to a scud warhead bus, probably as a crude MIRV.  We also know that he had very sophisticated binary shells, something no one suspected until the "insurgents" tried to use one as an IED.  That means he had a very sophisticated chemical weapons capability that no one knew about or he was able to buy them fomr someone else and we never found that out.

The question of WMD is settled.  Saddam had them and Kerry and company have lied about it, but Bush has made sure that no one died because of it.

[eeevil conservative]

more than willing to TRY!

LOL!

;-)

[MNJohnnie]

Korea and Iran each have military capabilities that make Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan combined look like Haiti today in comparison.

That another example of garbage in garbage out statistical manipulation. The numbers are utterly irrelevant. What is relevant is the comparative ability to project military power and fundamentally threaten the international political structure. On that comparison North Korea and Iraq about the same power as Mexico while Nazi Germany almost became the 1st Superpower.

Compared to the USA both are militarily insignificant. They can throw a sucker punch. A sucker punch. The price would be the whole scale extermination of their existing political elites. The only joker in the deck is the treason of our political and junk media classes. They may honestly be kidding themselves that we are "Too decadent" to fight.

They can ask Saddam and Mullar Omar about that.

[maica]

It has always amused me to hear Gore, Kerry, et al in their campaign speeches shouting "I'll FIGHT for" this..."I'll FIGHT for" that....But they are always for TALKING to the enemies who want to kill us.

This is the very example I use with the "War is not the Answer" Quaker-lady types who 'feel' that they are morally superior to people who want to defend our country. It is fun to see the quizzical look cross their faces as they process what I have said. Living in a Blue state, almost all of our politicians are "fighting" for this and that all the time.

[eeevil conservative]

I agree

sick of all the double talk out of them all..

[eeevil conservative]

LOL!

[samantha]

#368, I agree with my Husband who is Jewish and was in Israel when the 6 day War broke out so many moons ago. He says just bomb the @&^^%#$$%^((**&^^% to Hell. The rest is also ^%%@#$%^)((*&^,not able to be posted on a Family Website.

[cardinal4]

And Senator Dodd, AKA "Sandwich", just said this war is Bush's fault because he didnt "engage" the ME like Clinton did! Excuse me while I bang my head up against the wall in despair and frustration..

[kabar]

The Taliban did not attack us, Al Qeda did. How would that be any different then the Iranians using Hezbullah to attack us?

If you recall, we demanded that the Taliban hand over UBL and AQ. When they did not respond to our ultimatum, we attacked and took them down as well as most of AQ. If the Iranians use AQ (more likely) or Hezbullah against us, we would have to first prove that they did. With all of the current squawking about Iraq being a "war of choice" and the failure to link Saddam directly to the WTC bombing, I don't know if we would have the political will to attack Iran without having conclusive evidence that they were the culprits.

It is also worth noting that AQ was physcially located in Afghanistan. Hezbullah is mostly in Lebanon and Syria. What would we do to those countries?

[greyfoxx39]

Thanks Rod...

[samantha]

#376, very funny her Husband has the same doofus expressions and hang dog look as Maxwell (agent 86) Smart. She could be a spy in Germany,France, or countries that have a large Muslim Population that have converted some Caucasians to their beliefs.

[kabar]

How do you think we traced the dots back to Al Qeda so quickly after 9-11? Forensically there would be no way to cover up such an attack well enough to not leave a trail of bread crumbs leading back to the state sponsor. It makes for great fiction, it not real world.

Because AQ had attacked us in 1991 in WTC I, 1998 in Kenya and Tanzania, and the USS Cole in 2000. In addition, they declared war on us in 1996.