Skip to comments.
Sulzberger Responds to 'WSJ' Editorial Slamming the 'NYT'
Editor & Publisher ^
| 6/30/06
| E&P Staff
Posted on 06/30/2006 10:53:12 AM PDT by mathprof
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
1
posted on
06/30/2006 10:53:15 AM PDT
by
mathprof
To: mathprof
The editorial in today's WSJ was really quite good. I think it left a mark. NYT can go screw itself.
2
posted on
06/30/2006 10:57:24 AM PDT
by
segis
To: mathprof
Wow, the WSJ nailed that one on the head!
3
posted on
06/30/2006 10:58:48 AM PDT
by
piytar
To: segis
Agreed. The WSJ Editorial was great.
4
posted on
06/30/2006 10:58:54 AM PDT
by
mathprof
To: mathprof
5
posted on
06/30/2006 10:59:29 AM PDT
by
Stallone
(Mainstream Media is dead. I helped kill it.)
To: Stallone
New York Times Journalists Jihadists
6
posted on
06/30/2006 11:00:06 AM PDT
by
Stallone
(Mainstream Media is dead. I helped kill it.)
To: mathprof
Hmmm,....... must've hit a nerve.......
7
posted on
06/30/2006 11:01:49 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
To: segis
To: mathprof
Didn't the WSJ also report this story along with the Times? How are they explaining their decision to run the report while slamming the Times?
9
posted on
06/30/2006 11:02:09 AM PDT
by
Brytani
(Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
To: Brytani
Didn't the WSJ also report this story along with the Times? How are they explaining their decision to run the report while slamming the Times?Yes, that is true. The Editorial in today's WSJ explained their actions (quite well) and also slammed the NYT.
10
posted on
06/30/2006 11:03:56 AM PDT
by
mathprof
To: Brytani
"How are they explaining their decision to run the report while slamming the Times?"
Basically, they are saying that Treasury gave them the story after the NYT and LAT refused to spike the story.
11
posted on
06/30/2006 11:04:25 AM PDT
by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: Brytani
How are they explaining their decision to run the report while slamming the Times?They weren't going to run anything until the NYT made it clear that they were going to publish the story. At that point it became moot to withhold it.
12
posted on
06/30/2006 11:05:02 AM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Democrat Motto: Why not the worst)
To: mathprof
Well, if that isn't the WSJ Pot calling the NYT Kettle black!
To: segis
That's an understatement. That was a BLISTERING editorial by the WSJ. It reveals even more of the utter mendacity of Pinch Sulzberger and Bill Keller. And the WSJ has a bigger circulation among movers and shakers in America than the NYT does.
I wish I knew how to Photoshop. I'm dying to do a photo of Bill Keller as the Wicked Witch of the West, melting from a mere few drops of water. The New York Times is melting down as we speak. The Old Gray Lady has become the Harlot of 43d Street.
14
posted on
06/30/2006 11:08:28 AM PDT
by
Dems_R_Losers
(Meet the new dictators of America.....Bill Keller, James Risen, Eric Lichtblau, and Dana Priest)
To: mathprof
Someone should just "bit*hslap" ol' Pinch and take his newspaper away from him before he ruins it anymore. His management style sucks, as does the NY Times itself!
15
posted on
06/30/2006 11:08:33 AM PDT
by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: mathprof
Pinch gets more and more irrelevant...
16
posted on
06/30/2006 11:08:48 AM PDT
by
Fido969
("being an arrogant, self-important jerk is a prerequisite for becoming a university administrator.")
To: Brytani
Didn't the WSJ also report this story along with the Times? How are they explaining their decision to run the report while slamming the Times? The WSJ's news section in a recent survey was found to be the most liberal news paper in the country. Now their editorial secrtion is a whole different ballgame.
17
posted on
06/30/2006 11:10:10 AM PDT
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: Paperdoll
Well, if that isn't the WSJ Pot calling the NYT Kettle black!It isn't.
18
posted on
06/30/2006 11:10:28 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(I just love that woman.)
To: mathprof
Pretty lame of the Slimes to try to hide under the Journal's skirts. OTOH, this again makes it painfully obvious that for op/ed pages the "newspaper of record" is no longer the Slimes, but is the Journal.
To: mathprof
20
posted on
06/30/2006 11:15:03 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
