To: segis
That's an understatement. That was a BLISTERING editorial by the WSJ. It reveals even more of the utter mendacity of Pinch Sulzberger and Bill Keller. And the WSJ has a bigger circulation among movers and shakers in America than the NYT does.
I wish I knew how to Photoshop. I'm dying to do a photo of Bill Keller as the Wicked Witch of the West, melting from a mere few drops of water. The New York Times is melting down as we speak. The Old Gray Lady has become the Harlot of 43d Street.
14 posted on
06/30/2006 11:08:28 AM PDT by
Dems_R_Losers
(Meet the new dictators of America.....Bill Keller, James Risen, Eric Lichtblau, and Dana Priest)
To: Dems_R_Losers
I concur. I understated a little. :-)
I think NYT's slide into irrelevancy is the best thing to happen in a while. It is long overdue. I also think the people at helm at NYT should stay on for as long as possible till the NYT is on the same level as the Village Voice or worse. I am of the opinion that we don't need one "Newspaper of Record" - better to have mutiple newspapers of record or sources.
27 posted on
06/30/2006 11:21:17 AM PDT by
segis
To: Dems_R_Losers
That's an understatement. That was a BLISTERING editorial by the WSJ. It reveals even more of the utter mendacity of Pinch Sulzberger and Bill Keller. And the WSJ has a bigger circulation among movers and shakers in America than the NYT does.What the old saying?
The New York Times is for people who want to run the world.
The Washington Post is for the people who think they run the world.
And the Wall Street Journal is for the people that do run the world.
40 posted on
06/30/2006 11:29:59 AM PDT by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson