Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mathprof

Well, if that isn't the WSJ Pot calling the NYT Kettle black!


13 posted on 06/30/2006 11:08:11 AM PDT by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paperdoll
Well, if that isn't the WSJ Pot calling the NYT Kettle black!

It isn't.

18 posted on 06/30/2006 11:10:28 AM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Paperdoll

Read the editorial. If you don't understand it, get someone to explain it to you.


43 posted on 06/30/2006 11:31:33 AM PDT by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Paperdoll

WSJ did not have the story until the times made decision to print it. Administration declassified and called the WSJ with the story


56 posted on 06/30/2006 11:38:16 AM PDT by cmwy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Paperdoll
Well, if that isn't the WSJ Pot calling the NYT Kettle black!

Not even a little.

The NY Times was asked repeatedly by the government to spike their illegally-sourced story because it would harm intelligence gathering methods.

The Wall Street Journal was provided their information by named people in the Treasury department when it became clear that the Times would run their unauthorized story.

The kettle was working against the people charged with rooting out al Qaeda, while the pot was working with those people.

If you can't see the difference, maybe its your glasses that are black.

72 posted on 06/30/2006 11:53:59 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson