1 posted on
06/30/2006 10:53:15 AM PDT by
mathprof
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: mathprof
The editorial in today's WSJ was really quite good. I think it left a mark. NYT can go screw itself.
2 posted on
06/30/2006 10:57:24 AM PDT by
segis
To: mathprof
Wow, the WSJ nailed that one on the head!
3 posted on
06/30/2006 10:58:48 AM PDT by
piytar
To: mathprof
5 posted on
06/30/2006 10:59:29 AM PDT by
Stallone
(Mainstream Media is dead. I helped kill it.)
To: mathprof
Hmmm,....... must've hit a nerve.......
7 posted on
06/30/2006 11:01:49 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
To: mathprof
Didn't the WSJ also report this story along with the Times? How are they explaining their decision to run the report while slamming the Times?
9 posted on
06/30/2006 11:02:09 AM PDT by
Brytani
(Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
To: mathprof
Well, if that isn't the WSJ Pot calling the NYT Kettle black!
To: mathprof
Someone should just "bit*hslap" ol' Pinch and take his newspaper away from him before he ruins it anymore. His management style sucks, as does the NY Times itself!
15 posted on
06/30/2006 11:08:33 AM PDT by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: mathprof
Pinch gets more and more irrelevant...
16 posted on
06/30/2006 11:08:48 AM PDT by
Fido969
("being an arrogant, self-important jerk is a prerequisite for becoming a university administrator.")
To: mathprof
Pretty lame of the Slimes to try to hide under the Journal's skirts. OTOH, this again makes it painfully obvious that for op/ed pages the "newspaper of record" is no longer the Slimes, but is the Journal.
To: mathprof
20 posted on
06/30/2006 11:15:03 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: mathprof
The Times has defended its reporting, saying publication has served America's public interest.
Mr. Sulzburger, a couple of questions.
1. Who determines what is in America's public interest?
2. What public interest was served?
I have seen no public outcry that the Government reveal all the details of how it is tracking and capturing terrorists. Indeed, the only outcry we see is that the government be successful.
It is CLEAR, beyond a reasonable doubt clear, that you think you, the New York Times, are more capable of determining what is in the public's interest than the President of the United States, the Secretary of the Treasury, elected members of congress, and the chairmen of the 9/11 commission.
That sir, is the height of arrogance.
21 posted on
06/30/2006 11:16:35 AM PDT by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right....)
To: mathprof; potlatch; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; Grampa Dave; Interesting Times; bitt; abb; Boazo; ...
22 posted on
06/30/2006 11:17:15 AM PDT by
devolve
(fx 9125_AMERICANS_KILLED_2003_BY_ILLEGALS MEX_ILLEGAL_GOT_911_TERRORISTS_ID NO_NUEVO_TEJAS)
To: mathprof
"some officials who have been involved in these programs have spoken to the Times about their discomfort over the legality of the government's actions and over the adequacy of oversight."
Now We're getting some where! Could We please have a list of those individuals.
To: mathprof
The problem with the Times is that millions of Americans no longer believe that its editors would make those calculations in anything close to good faith. We certainly don't. On issue after issue, it has become clear that the Times believes the U.S. is not really at war, and in any case the Bush Administration lacks the legitimacy to wage it. They've got us dead to rights on this one...
30 posted on
06/30/2006 11:22:34 AM PDT by
GOPJ
('Pinch' has been named al-Qaida's Employee of the Month for the 12th straight month-Phil Brennan)
To: mathprof
I would love to see Pinch lose his head.....literally!
39 posted on
06/30/2006 11:29:34 AM PDT by
Niteranger68
(Behead the liberal media!)
To: mathprof; george76
45 posted on
06/30/2006 11:32:34 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic Lies posing as journalism)
To: mathprof
46 posted on
06/30/2006 11:33:26 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic Lies posing as journalism)
To: mathprof
The Wall Street Journal is a joke.
A. Lincoln: A house divided cannot stand.
Neither can a paper at war with itself.
World to WSJ you cannot have it both ways.
Cut out the good cop bad cop crap.
The Journal has more business sense the NYT this is p r and damage control which means they have heard from subscribers and are rightly scared.
Only in a world given to moral relativism can the WSJ signficantly distance itself from the NYT on this issue.
To: mathprof
49 posted on
06/30/2006 11:34:32 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic Lies posing as journalism)
To: mathprof
50 posted on
06/30/2006 11:35:18 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic Lies posing as journalism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
