Rush Limbaugh Live Thread Thru June 29th, 2006

RushLimbaugh.com ^

[MNJohnnie]

Rush must be hoving about 3 feet over his seat today. Show is going to be on fire.

[MNJohnnie]

Listen to Rush on Line. http://www.jasoncann.org/radio.htm

http://radio.findanisp.com/radio-shows-on-air.php

[MNJohnnie]

Boy is this going to be fun. The Leftists in the Junk Media are all missing the trap. The Court said the President could not order Tribunals but the CONGRESS can authorize it. So after they get themselves all worked up, I suggest the Congressional Leaders offer up Legislation. Lets see the Leftist politicians try to straddle this dilemma.

[Matchett-PI]

bttt

[ChicagoConservative27]

Morning Johnnie.

[Vision]

Ditto cam is on. Rush and his staff have the most bizarre taste in music.

[Coop]

Ping for later. And please do me a favor, Johnnie. If I don't check back in here, please let me know if Rush discusses Larry Bailey and the Vets for the Truth (VFTT) officially engaging Jack Murtha's treasonous behavior. Thanks!

[gov_bean_ counter]

Saw Lindsey Graham on Fox. It seems he may actually get this one right.

[BenLurkin]

Mrs. Lurkin says she hopes Rush quotes the President regarding his "drive-by" briefing on the Guantanamo ruling.

[marmar]

Gee...I thought the story of the Blue M&Ms hurt Rush, it probably just helped him. GO RUSH...he is the man...

[gov_bean_ counter]

I am predicting this will be the Dems next "Wellstone Moment".

[atomicpossum]

Consider the backlash that will favor the GOP. The public is not going to think very highly of the courts running the WOT, as they already do not think much of the idea of the 'rights' of terrorists. This is an issue that raises the profile of the WOT in the mid-terms, and that can only help Republican chances.

[Peach]

You're right and I'm not terribly upset by the decision as I think Congress will take care of it and Republicans will take care of Democrats who will show their true sympathies lie with the jihadists.

[Republican Red]

A commentator on CNBC (I think from the Wall Street Journal) made an interesting point that this could actually be bad news for the democrats because now they are going to sent the tribunal question to Congress and the Dems don't want to appear soft on National Defense right before the upcoming elections so the Dems are boxed in. Do they go against Bush and protect al qaeda - alienating the voters or do they give Bush a victory?

Interesting

[Ron in Acreage]

Linsey Graham said he will do just that. We'll now see the terrorist defense council, otherwise known as the democrat party, try to stop us from prosecuting them.

[prairiebreeze]

Good morning thanks for the thread. Great music on the webcast leading up to the start of the show.

[Matchett-PI]

DFU has a great card for sale on E-Bay.

Treasonous NEW YORK TIMES mocked unmercifully on eBay (this is a news item, not a solicitation)
DFU | 6-29-06 | Doug from Upland
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1657779/posts

We checked E-Bay and found it here. It already has 8 bid on it so far:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Osama-thank-you-card-sent-to-treasonous-NEW-YORK-TIMES_W0QQitemZ220002307068QQihZ012QQcategoryZ367QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

[PerConPat]

... I suggest the Congressional Leaders offer up Legislation. Lets see the Leftist politicians try to straddle this dilemma.

Right on. Dubya is suggesting the same thing.

[LS]

Johnnie, that is exactly right---this, moreover, provides an INCREDIBLE election year trap. The "moderates" will HAVE to vote for it, and Dems who don't will be in trouble back home.

But also it doesn't say we can't HOLD these guys. We can HOLD them for-freaking-ever.

[onyx]

NUMP

[onyx]

I mean,

BUMP