Posted on 06/22/2006 8:05:20 AM PDT by sinkspur
You mean the same "compromise" that's based on Tancredo's 2003 "compromise?"
The Manhattan Institute ran with a poll they did last March and suprisingly came up with similar results. Don't these open border hacks always do? The Wall St. Journal and Cato Institute are no different.
It's not quite as hard-line as Tancredo's, but still acceptable to me.
What's stopping foreigners from standing in line awaiting citizenship without going through the guest-worker rigoramore? What's the difference?
Pence's "path to citizenship" is the same procedure used by the USCIS.
The only difference between Pence and Tancredo's plans are the length of the guest-worker stay. Everything else is identical.
No, it's not hard-line at all. For the first three years there are no caps or visa limits. So if businesses want to bring in 500 million "guests" and their families to flood the labor market to the Atlantic ocean saturation point that's hunky dory with Mike.
I looked at the source and discounted most of the article from there on. Dallas County has one of the largest hispanic populations in the country and this paper is one of the biggest supporters of amnesty.
"Pence's "path to citizenship" is the same procedure used by the USCIS."
No it is not. It extends to illegals.
I heard a suggestion yesterday that perhaps our senators and congressmen should actually return to their elected states, hold town halls, and really listen to their constituents for a change. Of course, when it comes to McCain, those town halls are usually stacked and it's difficult to get in or to ask serious questions, because Mr. McCain doesn't like people to disagree with him.
If the House holds hearings, they should pick the states where Republican Senators voted for amnesty. Might surprise some of them.
The owners of DMN are probably just PO'd because that means sales of their "El Dia" paper will stay flat for a while.
IMO if they get millions more legalized the day won't be too far off where the hispanic leaders will do everything possible to create a new third party.....the name will most likely be a takeoff on La Raza.....and why not?.....they have THEIR own community, their own media, etc. plus all the help they need from the Mexican fedgov plus their own useful idiots in our fedgov and Congress.
Like start right here in Arizona -- or how about Tennessee where an illegal who had 11 drunk driving convictions just hit a couple head on (while he was drunk) and killed them... the first state to say we should give drivers' licenses to illegals and all those judges who let him go because they didn't want to deal with his illegal status. Wonder how Frist feels about that!
"The End."
You make some good points in your post. But in the end, greed wins out. It costs nothing for Messssico to just ship their social problems up north.
//////////////////////
As I mentioned, Mexico's ruling class is too preditory for their own good. In order to make that country a world class country the USA would have to force change there. The way to force change there is to send 12 million americanized mexicans back to mexico.
think they'll put up with the old ways of their rulers?
I don't.
IMO, this doesn't hurt them at all.
The wusses in the Senate for amnesty are those who will be hurt, IMO.
Its funny hopw many go along get along "conservatives" there are. Anyone who says they can convince conservatives that the plan Bush supports is good after 5 minuites is a grade A LIAR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.