[CROSSHIGHWAYMAN]

I can understand his frustration, but such a candidature would hand the White House to the Dems.

He's got my vote.

Ross Perot could have won in 1992 if he had been a real candidate and not just a Bush hating flake.

He got scared that he might actually win.

His 19% was immense even after he pulled out of the election.

Imagine that 19% disgruntled electorate plus another 19% for a fair tax, tight borders and cutting foreign aid , etc......

40% is a big winner in a 3 party race!!!

BRING IT ON......Republicans will switch in droves and Reagan Democrats will flock to a charismatic candidate.....one with common sense and a traditionally conservative platform!!!

Yes...I say.....

BRING IT ON....BIG TIME!!!

[CWOJackson]

"Imagine that 19% disgruntled electorate plus another 19% for a fair tax, tight borders and cutting foreign aid , etc......"

You forgot their position on the War on Terror...surrender.

[Conservative til I die]

Ross Perot could have won in 1992 if he had been a real candidate and not just a Bush hating flake.

Gilchrist is different...how? Seriously, this is the first "candidacy" type statement I've heard from the man, and calling for impeachment just paints him as a loon to me. And I follow politics. Gilchrist won't garner 0.05% of the vote.

[Conservative til I die]

40% is a big winner in a 3 party race!!!

BRING IT ON......Republicans will switch in droves and Reagan Democrats will flock to a charismatic candidate.....one with common sense and a traditionally conservative platform!!!

Yes...I say.....

BRING IT ON....BIG TIME!!!

I have one thing to ask...Shrooms or Acid?

[clamper1797]

BRING IT ON....BIG TIME!!!

Unless the republicans can field a viable candidate ... It may be that time. I will vote for the candidate that has the BEST chance of keeping the demoncrats out of office ... if it's the Constitution party ... so much the better

[Digger]

He's got my vote. Ross Perot could have won in 1992 if he had been a real candidate and not just a Bush hating flake. He got scared that he might actually win. His 19% was immense even after he pulled out of the election. Imagine that 19% disgruntled electorate plus another 19% for a fair tax, tight borders and cutting foreign aid , etc...... 40% is a big winner in a 3 party race!!! BRING IT ON......Republicans will switch in droves and Reagan Democrats will flock to a charismatic candidate.....one with common sense and a traditionally conservative platform!!! Yes...I say..... BRING IT ON....BIG TIME!!!

I like your style. Right On!

[Digger]

Imagine that 19% disgruntled electorate plus another 19% for a fair tax, tight borders and cutting foreign aid , etc...... 40% is a big winner in a 3 party race!!!

That's how I see it IF you can get the populace to understand this.

[isrul]

Th results of a poll were posted last week showing a three way race with illegal aliens as an issue. The dems eked out by a very slim margin. I think it was one point. Not sure. But if this issue becomes more of a concern to American citizens, (as well it might after the May Day march of intimidation), a third party candidate cannot be dismissed simply as a spoiler. Of course, a lot depends on this year's upcoming election debacle. I think the open border, amnesty goons are going to be decimated. I hope that's not wishful thinking, especially given that some races offer one goon opposing another.

[Stentor]

BRING IT ON......Republicans will switch in droves and Reagan Democrats will flock to a charismatic candidate.....one with common sense and a traditionally conservative platform!!!

LOL.

[griswold3]

Did you say Fair Tax? I'd support anyone who demands the FAIR TAX!!

[last american]

Ross Perot could have won in 1992 if he had been a real candidate and not just a Bush hating flake.

peROT dropped out of the race when Hilterly told him that if billy boy won and they got national health care he would be in charge of it. Ross Perot was/is the ultimate loser.