Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Founder of Minutemen targets run for president
WND ^ | 1 May 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 04/30/2006 7:22:13 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 with the Constitution Party.

Gilchrist has just returned from Florida where he met with the Constitution Party's national committee.

Party Chairman James Clymer told WorldNetDaily the party was excited about the possibility of Gilchrist as its marquis candidate.

"Yes, indeed we are interested," Clymer told WND. "Gilchrist spoke to us last weekend in Tampa and our people asked Jim then if he would be the candidate. We think it would be wonderful if Jim Gilchrist would seriously consider being our presidential candidate."

Gilchrist told WND the only candidate he would support as the Republican Party presidential nominee in 2008 was Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.

"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."

Gilchrist and the Constitution Party both agree on the need to secure our southern border with Mexico. Commenting on the street demonstrations planned on May 1, Gilchrist said they are nothing more than "a declaration that we are no longer a nation governed by the rule of law, but that we are being ruled by mob rule."

Asked whether he felt President Bush's "guest worker" program or the administration's "pathway to citizenship" were reasonable compromises, Gilchrist reacted sharply: "The Republican Party is going to pay a huge price for pandering to what they think is going to be an illegal-alien vote and for their reckless disregard for the rule of law. The Republican Party has sold out our sovereignty."

Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."

Gilchrist was harshly critical of Bush's leadership on the immigration issue.

"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."

Asked if he thought the recent arrests by the Department of Homeland Security cracking down on companies who hire illegal aliens was affective, Gilchrist dismissed the administration's efforts.

"It's nothing more than a show," Gilchrist argued. "DHS just served up another 'photo op.'"

"The political fix is on," Gilchrist warned. "The president thinks he has a compromise that the Republican leadership and the Democratic leadership can ram through Congress, but it's going to end up being jammed down the throats of the 300 million people the president is supposed to be preserving, protecting, and defending."

Gilchrist dismissed President Bush's attempt to get "comprehensive immigration reform" passed by Congress before the August recess. "Any law the Bush administration supports," Gilchrist predicted, "will be just like all the other immigration laws – a sellout. The administration plans to forget about the enforcement parts as soon as President Bush can shake hands with Ted Kennedy, right after he signs the law into effect. It's all a wink-wink game the Republicans have started playing with the Democrats. Both parties are really just the same, neither party wants to secure or border with Mexico."

How about "guest workers"?

"The 'guest worker' program, or whatever the PR guys at the White House decide to call it," Gilchrist answered, "will be nothing more than an amnesty. We're going to wave the magic wand and 30 million illegal aliens will somehow become citizens, despite the fact that they march under the Mexican flag and make up their own national anthem in Spanish. Pretty soon there will be 50 million illegal aliens here. Who knows? As far as George Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy are concerned, the more the merrier."

The Constitution Party supported Gilchrist in 2005, when he ran as an independent for Congress after Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., resigned. At that time, Clymer put out a strong statement supporting Gilchrist's candidacy. According to Dec. 15 party press release:

Jim Clymer, Chairman of the Constitution Party, believes that a major change is in order. Both the House and the Senate have been thoroughly corrupted by influence-peddling for decades, Clymer said. But the solution is not to run the Democrats to power or to elect a more ethical Republican majority. The solution is to jettison the two major parties altogether and to start afresh with principle-based leadership.

In 1992, Howard Philips left the Republican Party to found the U.S. Taxpayers Party and ran as the party's presidential candidate. In 1995, the party became the fifth political party to be recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national political party. In 1999, the party changed its name to the Constitution Party.

During the Nixon administration, Philips headed two federal agencies, serving last as the Director of the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.

In 2005, Gilchrist ran for the House seat of California Republican Chris Cox when Cox resigned to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee. Gilchrist received 25.5 percent of the vote in the general election, losing to Republican John Campbell.

A third-party candidate could represent a viable challenge to the Democrats in 2008.

A recent Rasmussen poll indicated disillusionment over President Bush's immigration policy could lead to a tie, with 31 percent of voters going for the Democratic Party presidential candidate, 31 percent going for a third party independent arguing to build a wall on the border, and 21 percent for the Republican candidate.

Gilchrist, a Marine veteran with 13-months combat experience in Vietnam, presents himself in an unassuming fashion.

"I'm just an average Joe citizen," Gilchrist told WND. "What we've proved is that an average Joe citizen can come out of nowhere and not only create the Minuteman Project, but can also run for president. I want to bring common sense and rule of law back into our national dialogue."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; aliens; borderlist; constitutionparty; corsi; cp; cp4hillary; cphearthillary; cpluvzhillary; dejavu92; fringe; gilchrist2008; hillary2008; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; jimgilchrist; minutemanproject; minutemen; president; tancredo; thirdparty; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last
To: Aussie Dasher
Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."

I may be crazy here, but I believe Perot finished third in every state in 1992 except possibly 1 or 2 where he finished second.

His performance in 1996 was even weaker.
41 posted on 04/30/2006 7:53:11 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN; CWOJackson

Listen to yourself...

We don't need any more 9/11 type attacks. That's crap.


42 posted on 04/30/2006 7:53:13 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Their position is posted on #23...surrender to the terrorists. Not exactly a conservative idea.


43 posted on 04/30/2006 7:53:45 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."

The old adage remains true: scratch a Third Party candidate, uncover a fringe whacko.

I was almost supportive of the Minutemen aways back, but somehow knew it would come to this.
44 posted on 04/30/2006 7:54:30 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign.

You know, as I've read this further, the Constitution Party would be wise to take a pass on him. An impeachment now would ONLY help the Democrats.
45 posted on 04/30/2006 7:55:01 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I can't wait for someone to say that he lacks popularity or name recognition (as if anyone outside Arkansas had even heard of Bill Clinton at this point in the 1992 election cycle).


46 posted on 04/30/2006 7:55:19 PM PDT by tertiary01 (Gang graffiti all over my fence and not one word of sympathy from any RNC type)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

He went so far as to travel to and visit with the CP. Makes you wonder what is real intention was all along.


47 posted on 04/30/2006 7:56:31 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Ross Perot could have won in 1992 if he had been a real candidate and not just a Bush hating flake.

Gilchrist is different...how? Seriously, this is the first "candidacy" type statement I've heard from the man, and calling for impeachment just paints him as a loon to me. And I follow politics. Gilchrist won't garner 0.05% of the vote.
48 posted on 04/30/2006 7:56:52 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

My best guess would be that he's trying to get more recognition, but it won't work.

I'm sure the CP could come up with someone better. At least, I hope they could.


49 posted on 04/30/2006 7:57:45 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
A recent Rasmussen poll indicated disillusionment over President Bush's immigration policy could lead to a tie, with 31 percent of voters going for the Democratic Party presidential candidate, 31 percent going for a third party independent arguing to build a wall on the border, and 21 percent for the Republican candidate.

Yeah right! This is akin to saying that the president's 33% approval rating means that the House Republicans will lose 67% of their seats. World Nut Daily is so bush league.
50 posted on 04/30/2006 7:58:31 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die

Well I don't want him to actually run. I sure would like to see him make so much noise that both sides start to listen though.


51 posted on 04/30/2006 7:58:43 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

He's rapidly becoming a media darling with his anti-Bush rhetoric. The CP is starved for national attention and recognition. It could be a marriage made in hell.


52 posted on 04/30/2006 7:59:31 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Yup...we've perot-d ourselves before.


53 posted on 04/30/2006 7:59:39 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
40% is a big winner in a 3 party race!!!

BRING IT ON......Republicans will switch in droves and Reagan Democrats will flock to a charismatic candidate.....one with common sense and a traditionally conservative platform!!!

Yes...I say.....

BRING IT ON....BIG TIME!!!


I have one thing to ask...Shrooms or Acid?
54 posted on 04/30/2006 8:00:05 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Gilchrist can only win if the majority of citizens who vote care only about the illegal immigration issue. One issue does not represent the country as a whole, nor the silent majority of commonnsense folks.


55 posted on 04/30/2006 8:00:24 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

IIRC Gilchrist actually won the vote taken on election day, it was all those absentee (thank Clinton and Motor Voter) that did him in.


56 posted on 04/30/2006 8:00:33 PM PDT by tertiary01 (Gang graffiti all over my fence and not one word of sympathy from any RNC type)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

'Twixt him and Condi Rice one supposes.


57 posted on 04/30/2006 8:03:14 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
IOW, Gilchrest knows he can't win.

He just wants to screw the Republicans.

You ought to accept the fact that the Republicans are screwing themselves.

58 posted on 04/30/2006 8:03:14 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
"I have one thing to ask...Shrooms or Acid?"

Whichever one gets him tossed out of here - click on his handle.
59 posted on 04/30/2006 8:03:35 PM PDT by decal (My name is "decal" and I approve this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."



If it's a choice between McCain, Gilchrist, and Kennedy, I'm voting for Gilchrist.


60 posted on 04/30/2006 8:03:53 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson