Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Founder of Minutemen targets run for president
WND ^ | 1 May 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 04/30/2006 7:22:13 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 with the Constitution Party.

Gilchrist has just returned from Florida where he met with the Constitution Party's national committee.

Party Chairman James Clymer told WorldNetDaily the party was excited about the possibility of Gilchrist as its marquis candidate.

"Yes, indeed we are interested," Clymer told WND. "Gilchrist spoke to us last weekend in Tampa and our people asked Jim then if he would be the candidate. We think it would be wonderful if Jim Gilchrist would seriously consider being our presidential candidate."

Gilchrist told WND the only candidate he would support as the Republican Party presidential nominee in 2008 was Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.

"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."

Gilchrist and the Constitution Party both agree on the need to secure our southern border with Mexico. Commenting on the street demonstrations planned on May 1, Gilchrist said they are nothing more than "a declaration that we are no longer a nation governed by the rule of law, but that we are being ruled by mob rule."

Asked whether he felt President Bush's "guest worker" program or the administration's "pathway to citizenship" were reasonable compromises, Gilchrist reacted sharply: "The Republican Party is going to pay a huge price for pandering to what they think is going to be an illegal-alien vote and for their reckless disregard for the rule of law. The Republican Party has sold out our sovereignty."

Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."

Gilchrist was harshly critical of Bush's leadership on the immigration issue.

"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."

Asked if he thought the recent arrests by the Department of Homeland Security cracking down on companies who hire illegal aliens was affective, Gilchrist dismissed the administration's efforts.

"It's nothing more than a show," Gilchrist argued. "DHS just served up another 'photo op.'"

"The political fix is on," Gilchrist warned. "The president thinks he has a compromise that the Republican leadership and the Democratic leadership can ram through Congress, but it's going to end up being jammed down the throats of the 300 million people the president is supposed to be preserving, protecting, and defending."

Gilchrist dismissed President Bush's attempt to get "comprehensive immigration reform" passed by Congress before the August recess. "Any law the Bush administration supports," Gilchrist predicted, "will be just like all the other immigration laws – a sellout. The administration plans to forget about the enforcement parts as soon as President Bush can shake hands with Ted Kennedy, right after he signs the law into effect. It's all a wink-wink game the Republicans have started playing with the Democrats. Both parties are really just the same, neither party wants to secure or border with Mexico."

How about "guest workers"?

"The 'guest worker' program, or whatever the PR guys at the White House decide to call it," Gilchrist answered, "will be nothing more than an amnesty. We're going to wave the magic wand and 30 million illegal aliens will somehow become citizens, despite the fact that they march under the Mexican flag and make up their own national anthem in Spanish. Pretty soon there will be 50 million illegal aliens here. Who knows? As far as George Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy are concerned, the more the merrier."

The Constitution Party supported Gilchrist in 2005, when he ran as an independent for Congress after Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., resigned. At that time, Clymer put out a strong statement supporting Gilchrist's candidacy. According to Dec. 15 party press release:

Jim Clymer, Chairman of the Constitution Party, believes that a major change is in order. Both the House and the Senate have been thoroughly corrupted by influence-peddling for decades, Clymer said. But the solution is not to run the Democrats to power or to elect a more ethical Republican majority. The solution is to jettison the two major parties altogether and to start afresh with principle-based leadership.

In 1992, Howard Philips left the Republican Party to found the U.S. Taxpayers Party and ran as the party's presidential candidate. In 1995, the party became the fifth political party to be recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national political party. In 1999, the party changed its name to the Constitution Party.

During the Nixon administration, Philips headed two federal agencies, serving last as the Director of the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.

In 2005, Gilchrist ran for the House seat of California Republican Chris Cox when Cox resigned to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee. Gilchrist received 25.5 percent of the vote in the general election, losing to Republican John Campbell.

A third-party candidate could represent a viable challenge to the Democrats in 2008.

A recent Rasmussen poll indicated disillusionment over President Bush's immigration policy could lead to a tie, with 31 percent of voters going for the Democratic Party presidential candidate, 31 percent going for a third party independent arguing to build a wall on the border, and 21 percent for the Republican candidate.

Gilchrist, a Marine veteran with 13-months combat experience in Vietnam, presents himself in an unassuming fashion.

"I'm just an average Joe citizen," Gilchrist told WND. "What we've proved is that an average Joe citizen can come out of nowhere and not only create the Minuteman Project, but can also run for president. I want to bring common sense and rule of law back into our national dialogue."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; aliens; borderlist; constitutionparty; corsi; cp; cp4hillary; cphearthillary; cpluvzhillary; dejavu92; fringe; gilchrist2008; hillary2008; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; jimgilchrist; minutemanproject; minutemen; president; tancredo; thirdparty; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last
I can understand his frustration, but such a candidature would hand the White House to the Dems.
1 posted on 04/30/2006 7:22:15 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The first thing they have to do is get a party chairman whose name is NOT "Clymer".


2 posted on 04/30/2006 7:23:56 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The GOP is already handing it to the democrats. Gilchrist wouldn't win but the issue wont be shoved aside.


3 posted on 04/30/2006 7:24:16 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
One would have to assume that the motives of the people running the CP are ideologically pure, albeit misguided, and not in league with the DNC.
4 posted on 04/30/2006 7:25:36 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I can understand his frustration, but such a candidature would hand the White House to the Dems.

And the difference would be....

5 posted on 04/30/2006 7:26:54 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
If the Dems take over the House it won't be the fault of the CP. The Repubs are doing just fine screwing their majority into the ground all on their own.

L

6 posted on 04/30/2006 7:27:16 PM PDT by Lurker (Anyone who doesn't demand an immediate end to illegal immigration is aiding the flesh trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I'm not questioning their motives, merely pointing out the realities...


7 posted on 04/30/2006 7:28:30 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

It is too bad that it is hard to match up such patriotism and dedication to the needs to win office in Washington...but it is fun to imagine. Too bad it is so difficult to find patriotism and Americanism in Washington.


8 posted on 04/30/2006 7:28:32 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher; CWOJackson
Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."

IOW, Gilchrest knows he can't win.

He just wants to screw the Republicans.

9 posted on 04/30/2006 7:28:59 PM PDT by sinkspur (Things are about to happen that will answer all your questions and solve all your problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Allow me to predict that this will be a very long thread ... and 'twill not be all sweetness and light.


10 posted on 04/30/2006 7:29:05 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Jim Gilchrist should find a Republican candidate that supports his views and back him, it would provide the best results.


11 posted on 04/30/2006 7:29:08 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne (Free Republic - The pulse of conservative politics, without lame stream media filtration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."

How about the legislation he shared with Feingold? McCain's leftist résumé is quite long.

12 posted on 04/30/2006 7:29:20 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

OK folks, keep those campaign donations coming in.


13 posted on 04/30/2006 7:29:55 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

This explains why the media is giving them so much attention.


14 posted on 04/30/2006 7:31:00 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

I think your money is safe...


15 posted on 04/30/2006 7:31:07 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I can understand his frustration, but such a candidature would hand the White House to the Dems.

He's got my vote.

Ross Perot could have won in 1992 if he had been a real candidate and not just a Bush hating flake.

He got scared that he might actually win.

His 19% was immense even after he pulled out of the election.

Imagine that 19% disgruntled electorate plus another 19% for a fair tax, tight borders and cutting foreign aid , etc......

40% is a big winner in a 3 party race!!!

BRING IT ON......Republicans will switch in droves and Reagan Democrats will flock to a charismatic candidate.....one with common sense and a traditionally conservative platform!!!

Yes...I say.....

BRING IT ON....BIG TIME!!!

16 posted on 04/30/2006 7:31:12 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I'm a proud GRINGO......is Bill Clinton still the president?...Seems that way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
and 'twill not be all sweetness and light.

LOL Where's the love man?
17 posted on 04/30/2006 7:31:25 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Well at least they won't run PeROUTed again....


18 posted on 04/30/2006 7:31:33 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I can understand his frustration, but such a candidature would hand the White House to the Dems.

I think at this point that is not a deterrent.There is not much if any difference between the parties at this point. And the old Hillary will win and the world is doomed has been bled dry.

19 posted on 04/30/2006 7:31:58 PM PDT by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
"Imagine that 19% disgruntled electorate plus another 19% for a fair tax, tight borders and cutting foreign aid , etc......"

You forgot their position on the War on Terror...surrender.

20 posted on 04/30/2006 7:32:57 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson