Posted on 04/30/2006 7:22:13 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 with the Constitution Party.
Gilchrist has just returned from Florida where he met with the Constitution Party's national committee.
Party Chairman James Clymer told WorldNetDaily the party was excited about the possibility of Gilchrist as its marquis candidate.
"Yes, indeed we are interested," Clymer told WND. "Gilchrist spoke to us last weekend in Tampa and our people asked Jim then if he would be the candidate. We think it would be wonderful if Jim Gilchrist would seriously consider being our presidential candidate."
Gilchrist told WND the only candidate he would support as the Republican Party presidential nominee in 2008 was Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.
"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."
Gilchrist and the Constitution Party both agree on the need to secure our southern border with Mexico. Commenting on the street demonstrations planned on May 1, Gilchrist said they are nothing more than "a declaration that we are no longer a nation governed by the rule of law, but that we are being ruled by mob rule."
Asked whether he felt President Bush's "guest worker" program or the administration's "pathway to citizenship" were reasonable compromises, Gilchrist reacted sharply: "The Republican Party is going to pay a huge price for pandering to what they think is going to be an illegal-alien vote and for their reckless disregard for the rule of law. The Republican Party has sold out our sovereignty."
Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."
Gilchrist was harshly critical of Bush's leadership on the immigration issue.
"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."
Asked if he thought the recent arrests by the Department of Homeland Security cracking down on companies who hire illegal aliens was affective, Gilchrist dismissed the administration's efforts.
"It's nothing more than a show," Gilchrist argued. "DHS just served up another 'photo op.'"
"The political fix is on," Gilchrist warned. "The president thinks he has a compromise that the Republican leadership and the Democratic leadership can ram through Congress, but it's going to end up being jammed down the throats of the 300 million people the president is supposed to be preserving, protecting, and defending."
Gilchrist dismissed President Bush's attempt to get "comprehensive immigration reform" passed by Congress before the August recess. "Any law the Bush administration supports," Gilchrist predicted, "will be just like all the other immigration laws – a sellout. The administration plans to forget about the enforcement parts as soon as President Bush can shake hands with Ted Kennedy, right after he signs the law into effect. It's all a wink-wink game the Republicans have started playing with the Democrats. Both parties are really just the same, neither party wants to secure or border with Mexico."
How about "guest workers"?
"The 'guest worker' program, or whatever the PR guys at the White House decide to call it," Gilchrist answered, "will be nothing more than an amnesty. We're going to wave the magic wand and 30 million illegal aliens will somehow become citizens, despite the fact that they march under the Mexican flag and make up their own national anthem in Spanish. Pretty soon there will be 50 million illegal aliens here. Who knows? As far as George Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy are concerned, the more the merrier."
The Constitution Party supported Gilchrist in 2005, when he ran as an independent for Congress after Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., resigned. At that time, Clymer put out a strong statement supporting Gilchrist's candidacy. According to Dec. 15 party press release:
Jim Clymer, Chairman of the Constitution Party, believes that a major change is in order. Both the House and the Senate have been thoroughly corrupted by influence-peddling for decades, Clymer said. But the solution is not to run the Democrats to power or to elect a more ethical Republican majority. The solution is to jettison the two major parties altogether and to start afresh with principle-based leadership.
In 1992, Howard Philips left the Republican Party to found the U.S. Taxpayers Party and ran as the party's presidential candidate. In 1995, the party became the fifth political party to be recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national political party. In 1999, the party changed its name to the Constitution Party.
During the Nixon administration, Philips headed two federal agencies, serving last as the Director of the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.
In 2005, Gilchrist ran for the House seat of California Republican Chris Cox when Cox resigned to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee. Gilchrist received 25.5 percent of the vote in the general election, losing to Republican John Campbell.
A third-party candidate could represent a viable challenge to the Democrats in 2008.
A recent Rasmussen poll indicated disillusionment over President Bush's immigration policy could lead to a tie, with 31 percent of voters going for the Democratic Party presidential candidate, 31 percent going for a third party independent arguing to build a wall on the border, and 21 percent for the Republican candidate.
Gilchrist, a Marine veteran with 13-months combat experience in Vietnam, presents himself in an unassuming fashion.
"I'm just an average Joe citizen," Gilchrist told WND. "What we've proved is that an average Joe citizen can come out of nowhere and not only create the Minuteman Project, but can also run for president. I want to bring common sense and rule of law back into our national dialogue."
If McLaim gets the nomination, we've lost anyway...
The first thing they have to do is get a party chairman whose name is NOT "Clymer".
-
Even if he's world class?
LOL! It does hurt when you get it in the nudds.
Cheer up. As one who lives in the subject district, Gilchrist just doesn't have the necessaries to make the pond ripple. (On some issues, in his AIP incarnation, he seemed rather hard core, paranoid, protectionist,with a redistributionist kink, kook, but that was before he tried to go mainsteam.) His running on some third party ticket, won't garner many votes. When it comes to POTUS, the dynamics are different, than a special House election in any event.
Sorry. The Republicans can't keep moving to the left and expect the vacuum on the right to remain empty forever.
He could not have caused any damage if the Republicans had their votes locked in. I didn't vote for him but I know people that did . The GOP was out of tune with a lot of voters. I'm not sure about what though.
A world class Clymer?
Better get on the phone, Tom. Gilchrest needs your solid expertise on how to win an election.
Well, don't say no one alerted you.
Unless the republicans can field a viable candidate ... It may be that time. I will vote for the candidate that has the BEST chance of keeping the demoncrats out of office ... if it's the Constitution party ... so much the better
The point of it is that was exactly his intention and some people foolishly fell for it. Everyone I know who voted for Perot wished they hadn't, and not because of Clinton. It was because Perot played them, made fools of them.
Perot never was in it as a serious contender...just to inact his petty revenge on President Bush.
I like your style. Right On!
Yes, and you just want to screw conservatives and squelch independent though.
Don't get too comfortable with his style...he went back to whence he came.
Why misguided??
The republicans have betrayed their conservative base. Why should we continue to stand by them??
At present (from the sidebar) 60% of FReepers will NOT vote republican. 60%!!! That is an incredible number for this forum. The numbers (last I checked) were in the thousands, so the precision is small. If this is representative of the conservative base nationwide, the republicans have already committed political suicide.
I understand that but what made people want someone else at the time? What did they see that they did not like about the Republican candidate?
They're being effective with what they're doing. Running for president is getting weird.
Ironically, Gilcrest may have lost the Orange County run, because it is such a traditionally conservative district.
Party loyalty is deep when facing a powerful adversary, and the Democrat party has so completely taken over California politics - he never really had any chance. Republicans, outnumbered and surrounded by Democrats vote party, almost instinctively.
That instinctive "vote GOP" response might not be a given, in a national race.
The GOP needs to make a genuine effort to bring Gilcrest onboard. He's a hero to quite a lot of patriotic Americans. It would be a huge miscalculation, to demonize him and drive him into an adversarial role.
LOL! Yep, I always trust people who say they won't vote Republican when they don't even know who the candidate is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.