Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Founder of Minutemen targets run for president
WND ^ | 1 May 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 04/30/2006 7:22:13 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 with the Constitution Party.

Gilchrist has just returned from Florida where he met with the Constitution Party's national committee.

Party Chairman James Clymer told WorldNetDaily the party was excited about the possibility of Gilchrist as its marquis candidate.

"Yes, indeed we are interested," Clymer told WND. "Gilchrist spoke to us last weekend in Tampa and our people asked Jim then if he would be the candidate. We think it would be wonderful if Jim Gilchrist would seriously consider being our presidential candidate."

Gilchrist told WND the only candidate he would support as the Republican Party presidential nominee in 2008 was Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.

"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."

Gilchrist and the Constitution Party both agree on the need to secure our southern border with Mexico. Commenting on the street demonstrations planned on May 1, Gilchrist said they are nothing more than "a declaration that we are no longer a nation governed by the rule of law, but that we are being ruled by mob rule."

Asked whether he felt President Bush's "guest worker" program or the administration's "pathway to citizenship" were reasonable compromises, Gilchrist reacted sharply: "The Republican Party is going to pay a huge price for pandering to what they think is going to be an illegal-alien vote and for their reckless disregard for the rule of law. The Republican Party has sold out our sovereignty."

Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."

Gilchrist was harshly critical of Bush's leadership on the immigration issue.

"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."

Asked if he thought the recent arrests by the Department of Homeland Security cracking down on companies who hire illegal aliens was affective, Gilchrist dismissed the administration's efforts.

"It's nothing more than a show," Gilchrist argued. "DHS just served up another 'photo op.'"

"The political fix is on," Gilchrist warned. "The president thinks he has a compromise that the Republican leadership and the Democratic leadership can ram through Congress, but it's going to end up being jammed down the throats of the 300 million people the president is supposed to be preserving, protecting, and defending."

Gilchrist dismissed President Bush's attempt to get "comprehensive immigration reform" passed by Congress before the August recess. "Any law the Bush administration supports," Gilchrist predicted, "will be just like all the other immigration laws – a sellout. The administration plans to forget about the enforcement parts as soon as President Bush can shake hands with Ted Kennedy, right after he signs the law into effect. It's all a wink-wink game the Republicans have started playing with the Democrats. Both parties are really just the same, neither party wants to secure or border with Mexico."

How about "guest workers"?

"The 'guest worker' program, or whatever the PR guys at the White House decide to call it," Gilchrist answered, "will be nothing more than an amnesty. We're going to wave the magic wand and 30 million illegal aliens will somehow become citizens, despite the fact that they march under the Mexican flag and make up their own national anthem in Spanish. Pretty soon there will be 50 million illegal aliens here. Who knows? As far as George Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy are concerned, the more the merrier."

The Constitution Party supported Gilchrist in 2005, when he ran as an independent for Congress after Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., resigned. At that time, Clymer put out a strong statement supporting Gilchrist's candidacy. According to Dec. 15 party press release:

Jim Clymer, Chairman of the Constitution Party, believes that a major change is in order. Both the House and the Senate have been thoroughly corrupted by influence-peddling for decades, Clymer said. But the solution is not to run the Democrats to power or to elect a more ethical Republican majority. The solution is to jettison the two major parties altogether and to start afresh with principle-based leadership.

In 1992, Howard Philips left the Republican Party to found the U.S. Taxpayers Party and ran as the party's presidential candidate. In 1995, the party became the fifth political party to be recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national political party. In 1999, the party changed its name to the Constitution Party.

During the Nixon administration, Philips headed two federal agencies, serving last as the Director of the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.

In 2005, Gilchrist ran for the House seat of California Republican Chris Cox when Cox resigned to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee. Gilchrist received 25.5 percent of the vote in the general election, losing to Republican John Campbell.

A third-party candidate could represent a viable challenge to the Democrats in 2008.

A recent Rasmussen poll indicated disillusionment over President Bush's immigration policy could lead to a tie, with 31 percent of voters going for the Democratic Party presidential candidate, 31 percent going for a third party independent arguing to build a wall on the border, and 21 percent for the Republican candidate.

Gilchrist, a Marine veteran with 13-months combat experience in Vietnam, presents himself in an unassuming fashion.

"I'm just an average Joe citizen," Gilchrist told WND. "What we've proved is that an average Joe citizen can come out of nowhere and not only create the Minuteman Project, but can also run for president. I want to bring common sense and rule of law back into our national dialogue."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; aliens; borderlist; constitutionparty; corsi; cp; cp4hillary; cphearthillary; cpluvzhillary; dejavu92; fringe; gilchrist2008; hillary2008; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; jimgilchrist; minutemanproject; minutemen; president; tancredo; thirdparty; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-303 next last
To: Aussie Dasher

Why not run for President from Republican Party?


221 posted on 05/01/2006 5:57:42 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Look, we should just name the new Wall/Fence after him..

The Gilchrist Wall, has a nice ring to it.

sw

222 posted on 05/01/2006 6:00:28 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife ($hop till you drop..TODAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I agree with a good deal of their war on terror platform. We have to be vigilant, even paranoid and extremist, when it comes to our rights and liberties. I'm no fan of the Patriot Act, the entire document needs to be re-examined and anything unnecessary removed.

We went into Afghanistan to capture Bin Laden, good move and we stay until we got our man. We went into Iraq to capture Hussein and recover any NBC weapons that Iraq had created. We've got Hussein, his regime is gone. The NBC weapons weren't there, oh well. We have assisted the Iraqi people, but the time we they need to make decisions about just what kind of society they would like to have are upon them. We will need to get out of the way for them to decide that.
223 posted on 05/01/2006 6:03:22 AM PDT by Hawk1976 (Borders. Language. Culture. AAA-0. Free Travis Mcgee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR

Yep, we have a two party system, centre-left and far left, on any given day.


224 posted on 05/01/2006 6:04:53 AM PDT by Hawk1976 (Borders. Language. Culture. AAA-0. Free Travis Mcgee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR
That's ten RINOs right off the top of my head to your two conservatives. Going over the entire Senate, maybe you could find ten conservatives while I'll be able to name 44 RINOs. Ok, I admit the GOP is not a bunch of RINOs. That is a simplistic description. In the interest of accuracy, the current crop of GOP federal legislators by sampling the Senate seems to be about 80% RINO and 20% conservative, and in the interest of democracy the 80% are running the party.

But...if 80% of the party leadership in Congress' controlling party is RINO, then the whole party is RINO. How else can one construe it?

Imagine: the whole Republican party is Republican-In-Name-Only.

It makes you wonder.
225 posted on 05/01/2006 6:12:51 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

And the difference would be


You nailed it cleanly....answer: NONE.


226 posted on 05/01/2006 6:14:21 AM PDT by worldclass (www.massright.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 with the Constitution Party."

I'll be voting for someone who promises to take meaningful action to secure our border and its looking increasingly like no Republican will step forward and be that candidate.

Gilchrist BUMP.


227 posted on 05/01/2006 6:18:29 AM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Candidates in Republican primaries receive money from the Republican party??






Here in Vermont preferred candidate of the GOP establishment is receiving money for the national party in a primary against a solid conservative in the race for Bernie Sander's open U.S. House Seat. So the answer to your question is YES!!!
228 posted on 05/01/2006 6:29:26 AM PDT by rob777 (Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

bttt


229 posted on 05/01/2006 6:44:12 AM PDT by Milhous (Sarcasm - the last refuge of an empty mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
I am opposed to abortion too
But do you really believe that right now with a war going on and the country being invaded by illegals preventing the liberals from aborting themselves into obsolescence is the most important issue ??
230 posted on 05/01/2006 6:53:03 AM PDT by 1903A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
What a bunch of hot air. Everyone knows the main issue on everyone's minds is the WOT. They took the stand against the Wot for one reason only..the Dems want to look like hawks compared to the CP.

It's a setup.

231 posted on 05/01/2006 6:53:29 AM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Refinersfire

Those of you who are opposed to the CP because of their anti-foreign-invasion policy (note that they have a strong anti-terrorist policy, but are against invading countries like Iraq and Afganistan), what would be your reaction, as Refinersfire said, of a tactical war of terror against terrorists. If Gilchrist proposed, dropping 10 "daisy cutters" every night on cave complexes and tribal hideouts in the Afgan/Pakistani mountains until the tribal leaders there turn over Bin Laden's body dead or alive, would you support his strategy? The inocents in the mountains be damned, either turn him over, or your mountain lair may be on the target list tonight. No rebuilding, not instituting a new government, no empire building, just out-and-out terror for terror. I wonder how long the bravery and tribal loyalty would last when you hear 100-200,000 pounds of TNT going off in your valley night after night.


232 posted on 05/01/2006 6:59:50 AM PDT by Small-L (I'm a staunch libertarian Republican, but I refuse to vote for a RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
"I'm looking for a candidate who will actually take an oath to honor and defend the Constitution and mean it."

Me too.

233 posted on 05/01/2006 6:59:50 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: 1903A3

In a nutshell,

politcally...NO

morally...YES


234 posted on 05/01/2006 7:18:54 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Did you say Fair Tax? I'd support anyone who demands the FAIR TAX!!


235 posted on 05/01/2006 7:22:08 AM PDT by griswold3 (Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
This party is deliberately splitting the Republicans apart on the WOT and immigration..the two biggest issues. If they had taken a stand like most Americans follow on the WOT then people would be signing up for the CP in droves.

I'll say it again...it's a setup people.

236 posted on 05/01/2006 7:48:45 AM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

trouble here is that if the country accepts these illegals there's another 40 million behind them.

The country heads for crack up dissolution or merging into some north american superstate--which is what the internationals have wanted all along.

All of it is just a very bad deal for americans.


237 posted on 05/01/2006 8:06:25 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

at least 40 million.....

there is no telling what amnesty would do

last time, 20 years ago it was for at first 800,000 but then 4-5 million showed up

Now, it's for 12-30 million depending on who you listen to

that could mean over 100 million easy by 2026....at that point we have become more or less Mexico North.

Imagine this many Russians or Canadians streaming in illegally. Given they would mostly not have the "ethnic sensitivity" thing going for them, the very same folks marching in the streets today would be marching then demanding these crackers get sent home.

It's all about race and redress.


238 posted on 05/01/2006 8:24:05 AM PDT by wardaddy (MALDEF and LULAC have infested this forum....as if RINOS weren't bad enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I can understand his frustration, but such a candidature would hand the White House to the Dems.

It already is. No other GOP POTUS has done more for them than G.W. Bush.

239 posted on 05/01/2006 8:45:13 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
CP's platform on terrorism works for me. I see it as being to the point and an accurate description of the situation. Had we done so starting in 1975 we wouldn't be in this mess. You forget it was the GOP who got us in this mess with an insane EO to start with. It was W's beloved mentor Jerry Ford. When Ford removed this:

Individuals responsible for acts of terrorism must be punished for their crimes, including the infliction of capital punishment where appropriate.

from being applied to foreign heads of state who support terrorism the rise in terrorism throughout the world began. Carter signed an E.O. doing it as did Reagan. To Reagan's credit he did go after such though.

240 posted on 05/01/2006 9:14:02 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson