Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Salvage prospect for 'junk' DNA
BBC News ^ | Wednesday, 26 April 2006, 05:53 GMT 06:53 UK | Paul Rincon

Posted on 04/28/2006 6:59:38 AM PDT by Sopater

Salvage prospect for 'junk' DNA

By Paul Rincon


BBC News science reporter


A mathematical analysis of the human genome suggests that so-called "junk DNA" might not be so useless after all.

The term junk DNA refers to those portions of the genome which appear to have no specific purpose.

But a team from IBM has identified patterns, or "motifs", that were found both in the junk areas of the genome and those which coded for proteins.

The presence of the motifs in junk DNA suggests these portions of the genome may have an important functional role.

These regions may indeed contain structure that we haven't seen before


Dr Isidore Rigoutsos, IBM

The findings are reported in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal.

But they will have to be verified by experimenters in the lab, the scientists behind the work point out.

Dr Andrew McCallion, who was not an author on the new paper, commented: "Up until not so long ago, we were under the impression that the vast majority of information in the genome, if not all of it, was encoded in those stretches of DNA that encoded proteins.

"We now understand there is much more complexity involved," Dr McCallion, from the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, US, told the BBC News website.

Lead author Isidore Rigoutsos and colleagues from IBM's Thomas J Watson Research Center used a mathematical tool known as pattern discovery to tease out patterns in the genome.

This technique is often used to mine useful information from very large repositories of data in the worlds of business and science.

Scrapheap challenge

They sifted through the approximate total of six billion letters in the non-coding regions of the human genome and looked for repeating sequence fragments, or motifs.

"One of the things that arises from this paper is that junk DNA may not be junk. But this needs to be verified," Dr Rigoutsos told the BBC News website.

DNA IN HUMAN CELLS

The double-stranded DNA molecule is held together by chemical components called bases

Adenine (A) bonds with thymine (T); cytosine (C) bonds with guanine (G)

These "letters" form the "code of life". There are estimated to be about 2.9 billion base-pairs in the human genome wound into 24 distinct bundles, or chromosomes

Written in the DNA are 20-25,000 genes, which human cells use as starting templates to make proteins. These sophisticated molecules build and maintain our bodies

The researchers found millions of the motifs in non-coding DNA. But roughly 128,000 of these also occurred in the coding region of the genome. These were also over-represented in genes which are involved in specific biological processes.

These processes include the regulation of transcription - the beginning of the process that ultimately leads to the translation of the genetic code into a peptide or protein - and communication between cells.

Dr Rigoutsos said his team's work suggested, "a connection between a vast area of the genome we didn't think was functional with the part of the genome we knew was functional.

"The average lab does not have the resources to prove or disprove this, so it will need a lot of effort by lots of people," he explained.

Gene silencing

The paper in PNAS suggests that the actual positioning of the motifs is associated with small RNA molecules that are involved with a process called post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS).

"A human embryo starts out as a single fertilised cell and rapidly divides into a widely complex series of cells that become a human being," explained Dr McCallion.

"Every cell in that human being contains the same complement of genes and what makes each cell different is the precise way that genes are turned on and turned off."

PTGS turns genes off after the process of transcription has taken place. One way in which this occurs is through "RNA interference", which involves the introduction of double-stranded RNA molecules.

These trigger the degradation of another type of RNA molecule known as messenger RNA (mRNA), "down-regulating" the gene. During transcription, this molecule encodes and carries information from genes to sites of protein synthesis.

"These regions may indeed contain structure that we haven't seen before," said Dr Rigoutsos.

"If indeed one of them corresponds to an active element that is involved in some kind of process, then the extent of cell process regulation that actually takes place is way beyond anything we have seen in the last decade."

Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk



TOPICS: Unclassified
KEYWORDS: creation; crevo; crevolist; dna; evolution; id; intelligentdesign; junkdna; science
A mathematical analysis of the human genome suggests that so-called "junk DNA" might not be so useless after all.

Why am I not surprised?
1 posted on 04/28/2006 6:59:40 AM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater
If there is no junk, then there were (are) no random, unsuccessful leftovers from evolutionary changes. How does that fit in with Evolutionary Theory?

It almost seems like the human genome was intelligently designed. What a shock.

2 posted on 04/28/2006 7:09:20 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
It does sound like some type of intelligent design as opposed to randomness.
3 posted on 04/28/2006 7:12:52 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Perhaps the "junk" in this discussion is the information provided by the folks that coined the term "junk science"?
4 posted on 04/28/2006 7:23:26 AM PDT by Fielding (Sans Dieu Rien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fielding

Sorry about that. Make that "junk dna".


5 posted on 04/28/2006 7:25:08 AM PDT by Fielding (Sans Dieu Rien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Oh, come on! If you threw some amino acids on rocks and zapped them with lightning this is what you'd expect to get. /SARCASM
6 posted on 04/28/2006 7:25:30 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

sounds like somebody needs more government funding


7 posted on 04/28/2006 7:26:05 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

... which is always the point right ?

Follow the money ...


8 posted on 04/28/2006 7:33:35 AM PDT by dartuser ("In 100 years the Bible will be forgotten and eliminated." - Voltaire (1694 - 1778))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
...How does that fit in with Evolutionary Theory?..

Don't worry - evolution always finds a way to make the facts fit. After all, it's the theory of "whatever happened and whatever will happen."

9 posted on 04/28/2006 7:36:40 AM PDT by KMJames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Well that clear it all up. This is Absolute Proof that we were created by Carl the Mad scientist, at Proxima Centauri. I knew he wouldn't waste all that space.


10 posted on 04/28/2006 7:39:52 AM PDT by Paradox (Removing all Doubt since 1998!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

This idea that the part of DNA we don't understand is junk is similar to the idea that we only use 10% of our brain.


11 posted on 04/28/2006 7:41:22 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

This is not surprising. It has been known for quite a while
that the genes and chromosomes have a secondary or tertiary
structural scheme.

Heterochromatin
Replication enzymes
Codons, introns, repressor genes, expressor genes, etc.
repair enzymes
swivel proteins
"histones"
Polyploidy
Lampbrush structures

The simple model that everyone shows of the double helix
made only of the 4 base nucleotides laying bare in the
cytoplasm is an oversimplification.
It goes back to the ideas of the 1800's where cells were
thought to be "bags of protoplasm" instead of the highly
structured integrated units they are. Now we're still increasing
our knowledge about how complex "life-biochemistry" really is.

On the other hand, these comments were produced entirely by
random keystrokes. No intelligence was needed to produce
these comments.


12 posted on 04/28/2006 7:53:18 AM PDT by Getready
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getready
All that I know is that the Cellowner's Association is demanding that they clean up the junk DNA off the blocks in the front yard and install approved Golgi apparati!
13 posted on 04/28/2006 11:41:16 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Are the molecular forces holding this DNA together known as junk bonds?


14 posted on 04/30/2006 10:00:10 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson