Sean Hannity Live Thread - Tues Feb 28th

[sofaman]

So...who will it be? Joe Lieberman? Charles Rangel? Dick Morris?

[bayourant]

Well thats amazing. I didnt even know what his wife did. I for got about the whole ferry incident. MAybe it was talked about on the cable shows but I cant remeber it that much.

[samantha]

Good rant, makes total sense. Time to cleanse the mind....of anything PORT..

[nopardons]

bttt

[aligncare]

Some ammunition:

"What's on your mind? If you'll forgive the overstatement." - Fred Allen

[aligncare]

More ammo:

"Fine words! I wonder where you stole them." - Jonathon Swift

[MOgirl]

Hello,

LOL! Today on our local radio news, I heard that the head of the DNC in East St. Louis was sentenced for vote fraud committed in Nov. 2004. He and his atty. tried to get probation because (nobody laugh, they were serious): the practice of buying votes is a long standing one, and just the way it is done. Apparently, he was extremely dismayed when the court sentenced him anyway. Poor guy, just doing his job...

Glad to be here, MOgirl

[MNJohnnie]

"Dubai is believed to have been" Intresting is it not that the Port Deal Hysterics can only make accusations. They cannot put one single witness in the chair to back up their accusations. I say all your accusations are nothing more then lies SD Prove me wrong. So far all you have posted is a bunch of accsations saying things liked "beleived, may have, is said to" I say this is just more lies by the people who went into Hysteric Mental Meltdown about "Arabs taking over our ports" and have been flailing around ever since. Considering how all the Democrat Port Deal talking points to date are poven lies, (Arabs taking over our ports...lie. Coast Guard says..lie. Access to US Security...lie. Access to senative US Military shipments...lie.) So like all the rest of the Port Deal Hysterics accusations, I say these are lies. Accusations are NOT facts. Prove me wrong.

Until the Port Deal Fores put some witnesses up their accusations are just so much rumor and hearsay. So far all the foes have dones is conducted a Trial by Accusation. Sorry the Jury is MUCH more swayed by witnesses like Tommy Franks and Oliver North then nameless sleze bag accusations in the "Flush the Koran" press. Considering the number of open lies published in the Failed Media in the last 36 months, I am surprised anyone thinks THEY are a credible source! It gets even funnier when the Foes quote stories where they qualify EVERY thing on with weasel words like "Is believed, is said to have, "Unnanmed sources hint" etc.

I say it is all a bunch of lies make up by the Port Deal foes. Prove me wrong.

[aligncare]

"A graceful taunt is worth a thousand insults." - Louis Nizer (1902 - 1994) English lawyer

[Stellar Dendrite]

"Unnanmed sources hint" etc.

I say it is all a bunch of lies make up by the Port Deal foes. Prove me wrong."

well it is rather easy to prove you're wrong johnnie-- who are we to believe....you or the wall street journal? LOL i think i know who ill go with.

unnamed sources? LOL can you read? court cases were part of the evidence used.

oh well...guess ill just have to use another source unless you want to call fox news liars too?


"the UAE was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist."

Fox News, February 20, 2006

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185347,00.html

[Stellar Dendrite]

lol, more from the WSJ article:

"Similarly, in 2003, UAE officials refused a U.S. request to intercept a shipment of nuclear technology bound for South Africa by a smuggler named Asher Karni, according to University of Georgia sanctions expert Scott Jones, who works with U.S. agencies on proliferation issues."

[eeevil conservative]

LOL! SO TRUE~!

YOU NAILED IT!

[MNJohnnie]

Oh too bad for you SD. Accusations are NOT facts. More accusations do not turn into facts just because you scream them louder. Considering the number of lies published as "Facts" by the Flush the Koran media, I seriously doubt the accusations here are being factually reported. Like most propaganda, the "facts" being presented are just too patly designed to bulkwork the attack lies. I suspect like the "Nuclear bomb has been smuggled across the boarder and is heading for Boston" propaganda, most of these "Facts" are just so much propaganda being spewed forth by Democrat Party PR machines. Rumor and Hearsay are NOT proof. They are merely accusations. I accuse the Port Deal Critics of knowingly lying. Prove me wrong.

[MNJohnnie]

So now you see the problem basing a PR campaign on rumor and hearsay accusations. It is all subjective. The other side can simply say "You are lying" and you have no way to prove you are not. Accusations are not facts. If the Port Deal Critics want to be taken seriously, they better find something better then news reports that write things like "It's believed", or "it is said" or "it is claimed" to base their case on. You are telling us we should believe YOUR accusations over the Administrations proofs. Sorry you lose.

[Stellar Dendrite]

talk about hysterical...if "its all lies" is your method of "disproving" them...LOL!!! first you said they were "unnamed sources"...then i showed how they werent and you've switched the issue. lets see...court cases as evidence, scott jones who works with US agencies on proliferation issues, fox news and WSJ.....ill go with them.


you're a waste of time johnnie, bye bye

[navynucmom]

Where is the Wed Sean thread :(

[AliVeritas]

Dane, was that you calling in re: Muhammad VI from Morocco?...