Skip to comments.
Boeing may use Antonov An-72 as platform for FCA bid
FlightInternational.com ^
| 20/01/2006
| STEPHEN TRIMBLE
Posted on 01/25/2006 10:28:11 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Dashing Dasher
21
posted on
01/25/2006 10:50:05 PM PST
by
null and void
("Never place a period where God has placed a coma" --Gracie Allen)
To: Paleo Conservative
22
posted on
01/25/2006 10:55:49 PM PST
by
hattend
To: Paleo Conservative
As Monty Python would say, "but she has large ... tracts of land."
To: Paleo Conservative
Don't the over wing engines help with short field performance? It's called the Coanda effect, where the airflow follows the surface of the airfoil design. That's why the Boeing YC-14 and Antonov An-72/74 had high-mounted engines, since the airflow from the engine exhaust actually followed the large wing flaps right behind the engine itself in a process called upper surface blowing. This results in dramatic reduction in takeoff and landing runs; indeed, the An-72 during its public demonstrations showed it could land and takeoff with the runway equivalent of not much more than the length of two American football fields!
The version of the An-74 proposed would probably use the same General Electric CF34 variant now used on the Embraer 190 regional jet airliner.
To: Paleo Conservative
Coanda Effect and its quieter than it would be if you hung the engines below the wing.
To: RayChuang88
The version of the An-74 proposed would probably use the same General Electric CF34 variant now used on the Embraer 190 regional jet airliner. I wonder if Boeing would also use lighter more advanced alloys than Antonov used.
To: HiTech RedNeck; Aeronaut; Tijeras_Slim; Fierce Allegiance
From the people who brought us, "NOW ISS SWIMWEAR! NOW ISS EEVENINKVEAR!"
27
posted on
01/25/2006 11:46:49 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Or a niftier Mr.)
To: martin_fierro
28
posted on
01/25/2006 11:47:20 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Petronski
Wish I could find that commercial online (it used to be somewhere just a few months ago). Classic!
The women could've been from Cheswick or Sharpsburg.
29
posted on
01/25/2006 11:50:28 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Or a niftier Mr.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Dear Boeing:
Don't even THINK about it.
30
posted on
01/25/2006 11:51:05 PM PST
by
spectre
To: martin_fierro
She might well have been my ancestor.
31
posted on
01/25/2006 11:54:23 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: martin_fierro; Petronski
The women could've been from Cheswick or Sharpsburg. They were actually Polish American women from Chicago.
32
posted on
01/25/2006 11:57:24 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(Divot: "You're Meshugah!" Bakshi: "I'm NOT Your Sugar!")
To: Clemenza
33
posted on
01/25/2006 11:58:48 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Isn't that the plane that Bruce Willis punched out of in one of those "Die Hard" movies?
34
posted on
01/26/2006 12:06:45 AM PST
by
fella
("(News) should be the maximum of information & minimum of comment." - Cobden)
To: HiTech RedNeck
The Tu-94 Bear was REALLY loud. The counter-rotating propellers' tips were supersonic at cruise speeds. All old Tu-94 crews are deaf as stumps.
It was so loud that it was bothersome to crews of our interceptors 100 meters away!
35
posted on
01/26/2006 12:53:04 AM PST
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
36
posted on
01/26/2006 12:53:39 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
To: martin_fierro
That was one of the funniest commercial I've ever seen. Still makes me laugh!
37
posted on
01/26/2006 2:27:11 AM PST
by
Rate_Determining_Step
(US Military - Draining the Swamp of Terrorism since 2001!)
To: Paleo Conservative
C-27J Spartan
CASA C-295
CASA CN-235
38
posted on
01/26/2006 2:56:55 AM PST
by
gridlock
(It's not really a circus until Teddy Kennedy steps out of the clown car...)
To: Dashing Dasher
Them Russians sure build ugly airplanes! Ugly, but functional. Still, what does it say about the state of the U.S. aircraft industry when Boeing, the 800 lb. gorilla of the transport aircraft business, has to offer a Soviet-era aircraft to meet a government requirement?
39
posted on
01/26/2006 3:00:15 AM PST
by
Squint
To: A.A. Cunningham
Kinda looks like a C-130 with big turbofans.
40
posted on
01/26/2006 3:01:32 AM PST
by
Squint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson