Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-2)
Senate Judiciary ^ | 1-10-06 | Senate Judiciary

Posted on 01/10/2006 4:14:05 AM PST by OXENinFLA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,921-2,9402,941-2,9602,961-2,9802,981-3,000 last
To: RedBloodedAmerican
I cant Believe Chappaquiddick Ted questioned this guy over ETHICS!...Surely...even a DUmmy can see the hypocrisy... I wonder how "the Swimmer' would fair with the ABA!...For what its worth....
THE KENNEDY LEGACY
Can't Drive......
Can't Fly.......
Can't Ski.......
Can't Skipper a boat...
(but they think they know whats best for everyone else!)
2,981 posted on 01/11/2006 12:03:29 AM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: mware

LOL!


2,982 posted on 01/11/2006 3:32:01 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2959 | View Replies]

To: All

Smooth Second Day for Judge Alito

Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito so far hasn't earned the outcry from opponents who are hoping to put him on the hook the way failed nominee Robert Bork was in 1987, but neither has the candidate gained the support of any senators sitting on the fence.

With no bombshells dropped through day two of the weeklong confirmation hearing, Democrats who voted against Chief Justice John Roberts in September appear equally dissatisfied with Alito, while Republicans so far seem ready to support the nominee

Fox News

2,983 posted on 01/11/2006 4:10:36 AM PST by amdgmary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2982 | View Replies]

To: All

2,984 posted on 01/11/2006 4:18:24 AM PST by amdgmary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2983 | View Replies]

To: All

Alito Pleases His Republican Backers

"Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito is carefully weaving his way through Senate confirmation hearings, saying enough to please his Republican backers while trying not to give Democratic critics any new material to use against his high court nomination."

Yahoo News

2,985 posted on 01/11/2006 4:21:03 AM PST by amdgmary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2984 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
I am suprised as to how each dissented. IOW I figured Thomas for the libertarian one, not Scalia.

And Thomas and Scalia joined in a common dissent in Rasul v. Bush, 542 US 466 (2004).

Even though there are only a handful of cases (Hamdi, Hamdan, Rasul, Padilla), I still haven't wrapped my brain around the specific issues each case addressed, and which issues are left rather unsettled. I take Rasul as a narrow finding of habeas corpus jurisdiction (under 28 USC 2241) of US Article III Courts over 1) alien prisoners, 2) held at Gitmo. Scalia & Thomas (& Rhenquist) dissenting said "no, and it's up to Congress to adjust 2241." It is the Rasul case that provoked Lindsey Graham's introduction of S.AMND.2516 - modified to S.AMND.2524, on November 14, 2005.

A good number of FReepers howled in derision at Graham's audacity! LOL.

2,986 posted on 01/11/2006 4:41:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2961 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Graham can rehabilitate himself with the base by marrying Laura Ingraham


2,987 posted on 01/11/2006 4:58:01 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2473 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks for the info. It's a lot. I hope to get a chance to look over all of it, sometime.


2,988 posted on 01/11/2006 5:11:31 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Pround member and founder of Alitists for Alito)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2986 | View Replies]

bttt


2,989 posted on 01/11/2006 5:39:03 AM PST by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2662 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

totally agree, saveliberty, totally agree.


2,990 posted on 01/11/2006 6:37:01 AM PST by N. Beaujon (http://www.nbeaujon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2853 | View Replies]

To: amdgmary

2,991 posted on 01/11/2006 6:38:57 AM PST by amdgmary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2985 | View Replies]

To: N. Beaujon

:-)


2,992 posted on 01/11/2006 6:44:46 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2990 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks for the information. I agree Judge Alito has responded well. I got a chuckle over his "That's a way of buying 30 seconds" response. One needs a little time to figure out what Lindsey is trying to get at.


2,993 posted on 01/11/2006 7:03:01 AM PST by rwa265 (The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2945 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

The Tenth Amendment? Oh I get it, your talking astronomy. That explains everything.


2,994 posted on 01/11/2006 7:03:35 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2978 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

bump.


2,995 posted on 01/11/2006 7:29:02 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Maturity has brought me the wisdom to realize just what a world class dumb ass I really am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

What ever reigns in their arrogance and makes them answerable to someone or one's who have authority over them.


2,996 posted on 01/11/2006 7:35:13 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Maturity has brought me the wisdom to realize just what a world class dumb ass I really am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Are you series??


2,997 posted on 01/11/2006 8:33:37 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all our troops at home and abroad!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2987 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

I thought Chuckie Schmuckie didn't believe in torture?


2,998 posted on 01/11/2006 2:08:09 PM PST by HonestConservative (Bless our Servicemen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2992 | View Replies]

To: HonestConservative

Except for R's. Not for murderers, thieves, rapists, terrorists or the Clintons. But I repeat myself


2,999 posted on 01/11/2006 2:11:44 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2998 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
Oh I get it

No you don't.

3,000 posted on 01/11/2006 6:18:19 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2994 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,921-2,9402,941-2,9602,961-2,9802,981-3,000 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson