Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unlike Most Democrats, Americans Grasp Security Web Posted: 01/08/2006 12:00 AM CST
San Antonio Express-News ^ | 01/08/2006 | Jonathan Gurwitz

Posted on 01/08/2006 6:58:23 AM PST by kellynla

There's a bear in the woods," began the most effective television commercial of Ronald Reagan's 1984 campaign for re-election. "For some people the bear is easy to see. Others don't see it at all."

This bit of political brilliance highlighted concerns about challenger Walter Mondale's suitability to be commander in chief. It played on the broader fear in the post-Vietnam era that the Democratic Party had gone soft on security and could not be entrusted with the nation's defense.

The bear spot, however, never mentioned national security or the Soviet Union, Democrats or Republicans, Mondale or Reagan. It didn't even mention an election.

It was an allegory, and a devastating one at that, reminding the American people that the leadership of one party was actively confronting a menace to the United States, while the leadership of the other party was, at best, incapable of recognizing that menace or, at worst, undermining efforts to advance American security interests.

Reagan trounced Mondale in one of the most lopsided presidential elections in American history, winning 49 of 50 states and 59 percent of the popular vote.

A handful of Democrats — Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Joseph Lieberman, for instance — seem to be cognizant of this history and the propensity for their party to be perceived as being weak on national security.

On this issue at least, they are appealing to an old and all but lost center of American politics and hearkening back to a Democratic foreign policy that vigorously advanced American interests.

The rest of the Democratic leadership, however, seems determined to rush headlong into a repeat of 1984.

It began last fall with the constant drumbeat for the immediate, or almost immediate or relatively immediate, withdrawal of all, or most or some, American combat forces from Iraq.

(Excerpt) Read more at mysanantonio.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: security; terrorism; war
"The point is not whether the American people have grown skeptical of the rationale for going to war in Iraq or the consequences of that war. By almost any measure of reliable polling data, a majority of them clearly has.

The political issue is whether Democrats can capitalize on that skepticism without corroborating the perception of weakness. Put another way, can they avoid pandering to the hard-left interests that have repeatedly spelled electoral disaster for them since 1968 and instead address the concerns of average Americans? Can they prove that they see the bear and have a strategy for victory?

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean already provided an answer when he said, "The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong."

And it came from Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid when he gloated to party activists, "We killed the Patriot Act."

Reid might have attenuated his partisan boast to say, "We forced the White House and the Republican-controlled Congress to consider greater protections for civil liberties in the Patriot Act." He might even have said, "We are working to fix a flawed yet essential Patriot Act."

Instead, Reid just killed it and tossed out the red meat.

As with Iraq, the point here is not whether a large number of Americans from a broad political spectrum are concerned about the erosion or potential erosion of civil liberties in the war on terror. They are.

The unavoidable political issue is that an even larger number of Americans has a greater concern that, given the opportunity, terrorists will kill more of their countrymen. And they believe that the Patriot Act, flaws and all, has been instrumental in preventing a repeat of Sept. 11, 2001, on American soil. As a political slogan, "We killed the Patriot Act" has all the electoral potential of "I am not a crook."

There is indeed a bear in the woods ... and in the desert and in the mountains and even, perhaps, in our own cities. And saying so doesn't compel Americans to surrender their right to dissent against their government or cede any other constitutional rights

To pretend it is not there, however, and to sublimate national security to score some cheap partisan points isn't just bad politics, it's also bad policy."

1 posted on 01/08/2006 6:58:24 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

ya might want to delete the time from the title.


2 posted on 01/08/2006 7:05:39 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I see a campaign commercial by someone running against Harry Reid using that quote "We killed the Patriot Act", while showing the collapse of the WTC, and Bin Laden smiling. Oh and also include a clip of illegal immigrants running across the border with backpack nukes.

There has been 4 years that congress has had the opportunity to amend the few flawed portions of the Patriot Act without killing the entire measure as Reid gloats.

Was it coincidence or opportunistic that the NSA investigation and leak was launched just days before the key vote to renew the Patriot Act, and did those charges help bring down the vote?


3 posted on 01/08/2006 7:13:19 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I was just debating this topic with my brother. It seems Hillary will have to run fairly hard left to make sure the Howard Dean wing doesn't desert ship. She may be the heir apparent, but also damaged goods for the general election.


4 posted on 01/08/2006 7:13:34 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It played on the broader fear in the post-Vietnam era that the Democratic Party had gone soft on security and could not be entrusted with the nation's defense.

Post-Vietnam my backside, the DemonRats have been pro-enemy since at least the 1940s. They were embracing every spy and communist thug then. "McCarthyism" is the ulitimate dirty word, God forbid you should root out and stop the enemies of your country.

5 posted on 01/08/2006 7:15:27 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

6 posted on 01/08/2006 7:15:28 AM PST by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Does this explain the myopic refusal to allow bear hunts in many parts of the country?


7 posted on 01/08/2006 7:25:52 AM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StACase
That is a most powerful commercial. I have 4 children, 1 grandchild and prayerfully many more. I do not want my country capitulating to the Isalmofacist like France or having places that my family can not go due to the terrorist. What is the matter with the dims? They just hate this country and I for one can't stand them.
8 posted on 01/08/2006 7:37:39 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
A handful of Democrats — Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Joseph Lieberman, for instance — seem to be cognizant of this history and the propensity for their party to be perceived as being weak on national security.

Where, exactly, was Mrs. Clinton on the issue of national security during the co-presidency we endured from 1992-2000?

9 posted on 01/08/2006 7:38:39 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean already provided an answer when he said, "The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong."

And it came from Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid when he gloated to party activists, "We killed the Patriot Act."

Aren't they just brilliant - two of the Democrat leaders and they act like this.....utterly unbelievable. Harry Reid the yayayaya gottcha school yard bully and Dean, simply a dazzling useful idiot.

If ever a nation needed to rid it’s self of deplorable politicians, it can start with these two – word on the street is that Nancy Pelosi already has her pink slip………

Terrorism=Saddam=Arafat=simple minded liberals. Bring on all technology that will stop terrorism. The President is well within his legal and Constitutional rights to protect America....the latter is all we need to know.

10 posted on 01/08/2006 7:51:45 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Maybe Karl Rove could re-work the commercial with a snake, instead of the bear. The message is still relevant!


11 posted on 01/08/2006 7:56:59 AM PST by canuck_conservative (leadership has responsibilities!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The bear is still in the woods though he's lost a little weight and right now there's this funny looking guy with a turban in front of him screeching like a banshee.

America gets it which is why Kerry had to pretend he was behind what Bush was doing even though he wasn't.


12 posted on 01/08/2006 8:08:53 AM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StACase

I hate to say it, but as much as I admire this president personally, there is nobody on his team who could have come close to producing anything as creative and effective as that Bear spot.

I hope that the the GOP has someone somewhere waiting in the wings who will do a better job of communicating that message than the Bush team did.


13 posted on 01/08/2006 8:20:45 AM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Karl Rove has never come up with a TV ad even close to that one.


14 posted on 01/08/2006 8:22:56 AM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

"There has been 4 years that congress has had the opportunity to amend the few flawed portions of the Patriot Act without killing the entire measure as Reid gloats"

In the upcoming election I'm hoping a few weak-kneed RINOs get the axe. I'd take a few years in the minority so long as we cleared out the sissymarys.


15 posted on 01/08/2006 8:47:03 AM PST by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
Where, exactly, was Mrs. Clinton on the issue of national security during the co-presidency we endured from 1992-2000?
---
She was against it. However, if it will help her election chances in 2008 she is willing to be for a strong defense.
At least until the votes are counted. After that, well, you know the answer.
16 posted on 01/08/2006 10:06:48 AM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

They ought to update the commercial to:

There's a cobra in the desert...


17 posted on 01/08/2006 10:25:43 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Bump


18 posted on 01/08/2006 3:02:35 PM PST by Yellow Rose of Texas (Separation of Church and State is a MYTH, read the First Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson