Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Celestial And Mathematical Precision In Ancient Architecture
Manitoban ^ | 1-7-2006 | Melissa hIEBERT

Posted on 01/07/2006 3:22:04 PM PST by blam

CELESTIAL AND MATHEMATICAL PRECISION IN ANCIENT ARCHITECTURE

And we think we’re advanced

MELISSA HIEBERT STAFF

Many ancient ruins demonstrate that the people who constructed them had not only a special regard for celestial bodies and mathematics, but also a spot-on accuracy. From Egypt to Mexico, there is no doubt that past civilizations were involved in incredibly complex space calculations, mathematics and architectural endeavours. Although many historians and archaeologists debate exactly what these civilizations did intentionally and what they did by mere chance, here are a few examples of how ancient architecture was created with mathematics and the cosmos in mind.

iza there are many examples of attention to spatial coordinates. For instance, the Great Pyramid’s faces are aligned with the four cardinal directions almost perfectly. In fact, they are less than 0.2 of a degree off. The pyramid is very precise, with the corners as little as two seconds of a degree (with 60 seconds in a minute of a degree, and 60 minutes in a degree) off of a 90-degree angle. In addition to this (although contested), the pyramids at Giza seem to match the stars of Orion’s belt with a certain precision.

The Site of Teotihuacan, “The Pyramid of the Sun,” as it has been dubbed, demonstrates advanced math. The pyramid’s base has a perimeter of 2932.8 feet, while the pyramid has a height of about 233.5 feet. If we take the ratio of base to height, we get about 12.56, or rather, 4p. Although to some this is thought to be a coincidence, the pyramid’s actual ratio is less than 0.05 per cent off of the true value for 4p.

The ancient Mayan site of Chichen Itza exemplifies the culture’s celestial orientation. The huge step pyramid (the pyramid of Kukulcan) that is the focus of the site has 91 steps on each of its sides, which add up to 364 steps. Adding the platform on top, there are 365 steps in total — the number of days in a year. Also, on the vernal and autumnal equinoxes (the first day of spring and fall, when day and night are the same length of time), the sunlight works to create a shadow of a giant serpent on the staircase that faces north.

A building called the Caracol, believed to have served as an observatory, is also found at the site of Chichen Itza. The windows are set up to align with certain points of interest. Although the top is damaged, remaining windows point to the northern- and southern-most positions of Venus, the position of sunset on the Equinoxes, and the corners of the building itself point to the sunrises and sets of the solstices.

The Mayans had a sophisticated calendar, losing only one day in 6000 years. Their predictions of solar and lunar eclipses were incredibly accurate. As many have heard, they predicted a date that they believed would be the end of the world. This date, translated to our calendar, is on December 23, 2012. Although unlikely, the world is predicted to suddenly end in about seven years (if we have just translated the meaning of their calendar correctly).

The Mayans did have some rationale behind this number. This date marks the time in the precessional cycle of the earth that we will move out of the constellation of Pisces and on to the age of Aquarius.

What is global precession? I’m glad you asked. Everyone knows that the earth spins on its axis while it revolves around the sun. Most remember from grade 10 science class that the earth’s axis is not perfectly vertical, but rather tilted about 23.5 degrees. However, the axis is not always this way, as it slowly varies from about 24.5 degrees to 22.1 degrees, making a complete cycle every 41,000 years.

While it is moving in this way, due to varying gravitational forces, the axis wobbles (precesses) in a clockwise circle. Just imagine the way the axis of a top spins as it begins to fall. So, the angle of the earth stays the same (or somewhere within its three degree variance), but the direction in which it points changes. For example, our current North Star is Polaris (or Ursae Minoris), as the North Pole points towards this star. However, approximately 13,000 years ago, the North Pole would have pointed towards the star Vega, as it will do again in about another 13,000 years. It takes about 25,776 years to complete one precessional cycle.

Anyone ever heard of the song “Age of Aquarius”? Well, this is in reference to the earth’s precessional cycle. Presently we are in the age of Pisces, which means that when the sun rises on the vernal equinox it rises in the direction that the constellation of Pisces is in the sky. However, due to precession, every 2160 years on the vernal equinox the sun rises in a different constellation. As mentioned above, we will be moving out of the age of Pisces and into the age of Aquarius around the end of 2012.

So, the Mayans figured there was something important to the changing of ages, hence their predicted death date. However, they are not the only ones who seem to have taken certain numbers into account. The perimeter of the Great Pyramid at Giza is approximately 3,023 feet and the height is 481 feet. In addition to exemplifying a ratio of exactly 2p, its measurements are said to possibly represent the Northern Hemisphere of the earth, on a scale of 1 : 43,200. Though controversial, some interpret this number as exactly 20 times the precessional number of 2160, representing the precession of the earth through 20 different zodiac constellations or ‘ages.’

These examples of precessional numbers, mathematics and celestial orientations found in ancient structures by no means scratch the surface of all of the occurrences (or at least, proposed occurrences) present at various historical sites, and even in cultural songs and myths. Whether or not various theories or speculations concerning these spectacular constructions are true or not (and we may never know), the meticulous precision that was put into planning, calculating and building them is hard to ignore, not to mention awe-inspiring.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancient; architecture; celestial; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; math; mathematical; precision
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2006 3:22:07 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 01/07/2006 3:22:43 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
less than 0.2 of a degree off

This is less than wonderful. Anybody can align something within a minute. Being off a minute makes for a poor shot.

3 posted on 01/07/2006 3:24:58 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I believe that just like genuine artists don't have to be taught the principles of good design........so do true architects/builders have an intuitive understanding of shape and space and what will work and what won't.


4 posted on 01/07/2006 3:28:59 PM PST by desertlily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
And we think we’re advanced

Amazing coincidence. I was at the top of this pyramid some years ago, marvelling and wandering around, when I went into the little room at the top, there was this woman, doing something like a Tai Chi dance, obviously trying to bond with the spirits of those who made the pyramid. She started telling me how amazing this place was, how it showed that there were others as advanced as us. She said the same quote: And we think we’re advanced

I listened and talked with her for a few minutes and then pointed to the side of the pyramid where it is said they threw the bodies of those whose hearts they had just cut out live......sometimes thousands in a day.

She was awfully silent after that.

5 posted on 01/07/2006 3:29:48 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Oddly enough, I have something to contribute that I was about to add to my links page here on FR, and had it ready in the Paste buffer:

GGG: Egypt: On Proving Ancient Megalith Construction by Jim Solley
http://slimebug.home.comcast.net/megaliths.html


6 posted on 01/07/2006 3:44:24 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this URL -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/pledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

How hard is it to aline a building with the North Star?


7 posted on 01/07/2006 3:45:18 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Re the occurence of "pi" in dimension-ratios of ancient buildings:

Not as advanced as you might think. Lateral distances can easily be marked off in "turns" of a wheel of unit diameter; so if height is measured in just the units, the ratio will always contain pi!


8 posted on 01/07/2006 4:13:00 PM PST by canuck_conservative (leadership has responsibilities!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
I to climbed the pyramid a few years ago. Well I got half way to the top and my vertigo kicked in. Never saw such steep steps. Hugged them all the way down. Even with that I was totally fascinated with Chichen Itza. I got to go to Giza last May and I've been to the big pyramid at Teotihaucan outside Mexico City a long, long time ago.

Am I missing any biggies?
9 posted on 01/07/2006 4:41:18 PM PST by Recon Dad (Proud Marine Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
How about that precessional wobble or whatever the name was for the wobble of the axis. Betcha that has something to do with climate change and the evil Global Warming every 41,000 years.
10 posted on 01/07/2006 4:48:20 PM PST by Thebaddog (K9 4ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why do we continue to be amazed that ancient people could count, add and subtract?


11 posted on 01/07/2006 4:50:58 PM PST by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Don't know but need to know how to cut an arc 48 inches long. I am making a bench in the Shaker style. Sory that I am igorant but can't figure it out. If you have some formula let me know. Thanks. Archimedes where are you?


12 posted on 01/07/2006 5:20:21 PM PST by Foundahardheadedwoman (I can't spell. As you have no doubt noticed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
She was awfully silent after that.

You're mean ;-) I like that. Facts never bother a liberal ( and Tai Chi types are invariably liberal.)

I bet they killed em very precisely too.......
13 posted on 01/07/2006 5:22:43 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

A valid observation.


14 posted on 01/07/2006 5:25:08 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Anyone who has ever tried to do math the way they used to do it knows they had to be some pretty smart people.


15 posted on 01/07/2006 6:50:57 PM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

Make a template using a string and a pencil. Cut the string to the correct length, place the pencil point at the center of the arc (or circle since an arc is only a portion of a circle) and draw 48".


16 posted on 01/07/2006 6:58:28 PM PST by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
Am I missing any biggies?

Just the strange woman at the top.....

:-)

17 posted on 01/07/2006 7:40:00 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: festus
As precise as you can be with a stone knife and a live subject.........why do these priests that were remind me of the Taliban?

I have no doubt this woman was a lib. Hopefully she has seen the error of her ways. I actually felt a bit sorry for her, all the same.........twas hard not to laugh when I saw her.......

Yeah......... mean.....but it was pretty funny too!

18 posted on 01/07/2006 7:45:24 PM PST by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
Good summary: but it is not that difficult to align large structures (even then!) with little more than a plumb bob, tight string or rope, and a straight pole.

Yes, it takes precision, but a few years of observation from the same place will give accurate sight lines to build the desired structure.

Strangely, this writer did not include Stonehenge, arguably much more complex than the pyramid because of the sun and moon sight lines to the equinoxes, the max point, minimum point, and the solar and lunar eclipse predictions made possible by the circles of stone and pits.
19 posted on 01/07/2006 7:54:24 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33; Foundahardheadedwoman


Make a template using a string and a pencil. Cut the string to the correct length, place the pencil point at the center of the arc (or circle since an arc is only a portion of a circle) and draw 48".

I don't that will work: the piece seems to be a curved member (What radius?) whose LENGTH along the outside of the arc is 48".

So, with a string and pencil, or thin board (1/2 x 1/2, 1 x 1/4) with a pencil hole in one end, and a pointer hole in the other (???) distance away, draw a circle. Take the string or tape measure, or one inch long strip of wood, or rule exactly one inch wide, and mark off 48 increments along the circle.

A little faster, but a little less accurate? Use a 2" or 3" strip. Get one of those cheap ($1.50) little compass sets from the grocery store and use it to mark off equal lengths.

For what you are cutting (Shaker furniture), this method of using a bunch of small straight lengths around the circle will be accurate enough.

20 posted on 01/07/2006 8:02:43 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson