Posted on 12/13/2005 5:25:39 PM PST by calcowgirl
For Immediate Release:
12/13/2005 For More Information:
Contact Bernadette Del Chiaro
(916) 446-8062 x 103
SAN FRANCISCOThe California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) officially unveiled its version of the Million Solar Roofs program, called the California Solar Initiative, proposing an 11-year, $2.9 billion incentive program to install 3,000 MW of solar on a million homes, businesses, farms, schools and municipal buildings. The program, if approved in mid-January by the 5-member Public Utilities Commission, will be the nations largest solar power investment and the first-ever program designed to make solar power mainstream and affordable, without aid of subsidies, within a decade.
With this program, California can finally get on track to becoming the world solar power leader, said Bernadette Del Chiaro, clean energy advocate for Environment California, a nonprofit, nonpartisan environmental advocacy group. Given Californias abundant sunshine and growing economy, this program has the potential to make California the Saudi Arabia of solar power.
The California Solar Initiative proposes a $2.9 billion pot of money without rate increases for most customers. The money would come from $350 million in existing funds already earmarked for solar power and an additional surcharge 1/8th a penny per kilowatt hour or 60¢ on the average residential monthly electric bill over eleven years. According to the proposal, this additional surcharge will not impact rates because the Rate Reduction Bonds authorized during Californias electric restructuring law will expire in 2007 leaving additional headroom in utility rates.
According to a staff report prepared by the PUC last summer, this $2.9 billion investment in solar could save California ratepayers an estimated $10 billion from a reduced need to build two dozen peaking power plants or to purchase expensive electricity during peak summer hours.
Given this high energy bills and the urgent need to reduce the states reliance on imported fossil fuels, this landmark solar initiative is exactly what Californias economy and environment need, added Del Chiaro whos organization has spent the past six months talking directly with more than 250,000 Californians about solar power. Poll after poll show that these kinds of forward-thinking clean energy solutions are what the majority of California voters are demanding.
Other benefits of investing in solar power include cleaner air and more jobs. For every solar roof, at least one ton of global warming pollution is reduced. In addition, for every megawatt of solar power installed, up to 7 jobs are created, a 7-fold increase over the number of jobs created from building the equivalent capacity in natural gas power plants.
Todays proposal comes at the request of Governor Schwarzenegger and mirrors the bulk of the Governor-backed Million Solar Roofs bill (SB 1), which was also broadly support by the state Legislature. The other policy elements contained in SB 1, such as net metering and making solar panels a standard option on new homes, will require legislative approval in 2006 to support the California Solar Initiative unveiled by the PUC today.
After three years of working to pass this kind of far reaching solar policy, this proposal is a breath of fresh air, added Del Chiaro. Now, California will mean business when it comes to making solar power mainstream and affordable for all.
The PUCs 11-year solar proposal is expected to be voted on by PUC in mid-January, after a 30 day public comment period initiated today. If adopted, the program is likely to go into effect by the start of 2007. In the meantime, this Thursday, December 15th, the PUC is expected to vote on the first stage of the California Solar Initiative, an interim program to triple the amount of money available in 2006 for solar on businesses and municipal buildings, from the current $50-100 million level to $300 million. In addition, $58 million remains available for homeowners and small businesses to invest in solar panels via the California Energy Commissions rebate program in 2006.
MAJOR ELEMENTS OF PROPOSED CALIFORNIA SOLAR INITIATIVE
PUCs California Solar Initiative Proposal 12/13/05 (PDF FILE)
Environment California is a non-profit, non-partisan state-based environmental organization supported by 77,000 members statewide. Environment California has been the leading environmental advocacy group supporting the Million Solar Roofs bill since 2003. For more information about our Million Solar Roofs campaign visit www.environmentcalifornia.org.
This is likely one of the least significant elements of this question. The lead/acid batteries last a long time if they are not deep-discharged (more than 50%) and checked for water level at proper intervals. When they fail, the lead is reused to make new batteries, so there is little waste there.
Lithium ion batteries have a better size to capacity ratio than lead/acid batteries, but cost so much more that they could never pay for themselves under any known scenario. They also present a more grave waste disposal/recycling problem than lead, which is almost inert in it's metalic state.
We have been using a one KW system at our ranch for five years, that supplies all the power we need for everything except running the pumps and wells, for which we use IC engines. The system has been running continuously without any malfunction, and the batteries are still at about 98% capacity, due to careful control of charge and float voltages, to keep the batteries cool in the summer (which is when most damage is done).
1) From the proposal: Utility customers taking service on the California Alternative Rates for Energy (CARE) should be exempted from the costs of this program as a matter of equity
That's permissive suggestion, as opposed to regulatory language. Translation: We suggest you do so but we acknowledge insufficient funding levels if you do. The regulatory language immediately preceding reads : "component would be funded using distribution revenues from all gas and electric customers
2) From LIHEAP: The utilities report that more than one million low-income customers meet the CARE eligibility criteria but are not currently participating in the program. December 7, 2005
Thanks for that. I have much to learn in the area of energy. I do know the regulation business at length (in another industry sector) and agree with your "should/would" observation.
Rooftop hot water heaters used to be commonplace in Florida--as late as the 1950's. Then they went away during the era of dirtcheap energy.
Probably not.
On average, the solar panel export industry in China has grown by 25 percent each year for the past 10 years. But while the country's growth rates appear to be very high, they are actually lower than worldwide demand growth rates of solar panels and products.
One of the main reasons for this is a severe lack of solar cells, which is the result of a worldwide shortage of hyperpure or semiconductor-grade silicon, the base material for solar cells.
Without government money there would have been no canals to open the trans-Appalachian west; No transcontinental railroads until much much later; No commercial air travel (no airports, no aviation R&D); No Interstate Highway system; No nuclear generating plants producing electricity.
None of these enterprises made a profit initially, and many banks went broke funding growth in the 19th century. But we built this country on government assuming the risks, speculation and boom-bust cycles, and bad debt, for anyone who wants to know.
Maybe the time for government to act and pump life into the alternative energy field has arrived. If the people of California want to be the benefactors of the new energy economy, I say, Thanks.
The governor specifically praised a solar chip from SunPower, a solar company in Sunnyvale, California. This is the future, ladies and gentleman, he said.Shareholders were made very happy when Schwarzenegger's promotion that day more than doubled the value of their share price, days before their IPO. See more snips hereThe chip, designed in California and manufactured in China, is an amazing China-California success story that represents the future, Mr. Schwarzenegger said.
"Million Solar Roofs"?
I wonder if this is inspired by george bush's thousand points of light theme?
By the way--we're gonna help get Solar installed in Mexico, too! That along with what appears to be a quasi-merger of our school system! Check out the Governor's latest Radio Address.
(snip)We saw two classes linked by videoconference where the students talked back and forth, shared ideas and improved their language skills. These are the first two sister schools but we are going to expand this program to as many schools as possible so more children from California and Mexico can learn from each other.
As we find new ways to bring the leaders of tomorrow together we are also working hard to solve the challenges we face today, challenges like expanding our economy.
That's why it's important to speed up the movement of goods across our border and build new economic partnerships like the one we're creating in high tech, between our Silicon Valley and the Silicon Border, or the steps we're taking to bring California solar technology to Baja to help them meet their energy needs.
..we are going to expand this program to as many schools as possible so more children from California and Mexico can learn from each other.
--
Oh joy. :\
looks like the incubator for a merged NA is set to High..
Pretty sure this was originally John Campbell's baby.
Now he's been inflicted on the whole country...dang...
They can't pass high school graduation exams in English, but we're worried about them improving their foreign language skills. This is giving Hedgetrimmer's posts about the North American Union new credence, imo.
PING - You might find these tidbits interesting.
I used to have one too (back in the 80's in Texas). Being on a corner, The company inststalling it gave me a 40% break on the price, which along with the tax credit from the feds cost me only $1500. It ran well, and saved a lot, but only becuase I was a total electric house. If I had gas/propane hot water, it would have never paid off. As it was, this system paid off in 4 years and was still running when we sold the house in 1994. It was a Reynolds Aluminum Crown Top system.
To make a long story short, unless the cost of the hot water systems can be significantly reduced, say 60% or more, they will never pay off in any reasonable time.
It also sounds like some old Mao Chicom promotion from the "Great Leap Forward" and the Cultural Revolution!
That's what they said the last twelve times.
California is hilarious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.