Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Howard Fineman: Rove Non-Indictment a Bush 'Victory'
NewsMax ^ | October 28, 2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 10/28/2005 12:22:42 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Newsweek magazine reporter Howard Fineman, who's been at the forefront of recent media speculation that top White House official Karl Rove would be indicted, has pronounced Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's decision to indict only Cheney aide Lewis Libby "a victory" for the Bush White House.

"Given the expectations that have evolved around here in the last week or so, if it turns out that this phase of the grand jury ends with only Scooter Libby being indicted," Fineman told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough last night, "that will be seen as almost be seen as a backwards kind of victory here."

Scarborough agreed, saying that the indictment of Libby without Rove would be, "a huge political win for the White House."

Fineman said Rove, not Libby, was Fitzgerald's "big fish."

"Karl Rove is a big national figure and as close to the president of the United States as you can get without being a member of the president`s family," he told Scarborough. "And so, politically, Karl Rove is the much bigger fish here."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beltwaywarzone; bush; cialeak; fineman; libby; rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2005 12:22:43 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative; All

Bout time someone said it! IT IS A BUSH VICTORY! The Dems and Leftists were aiming for the BIG FISH (Rove, Cheney, Karen Hughes, Bolton & even BUSH) but got nothing but Libby!


2 posted on 10/28/2005 12:24:37 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

It's not over yet. He'll charge Rove before he's through.


3 posted on 10/28/2005 12:25:45 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

if the libs tell you diferently just read this AP headline:



Rove Not Expected to Be Indicted Today


4 posted on 10/28/2005 12:25:55 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Ever since Scarborough ventured to MsNBC his has gone to the dark side!
5 posted on 10/28/2005 12:26:03 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

Dont' think so. He said he wanted to get this over with. I think he's going to indict a journalist!


6 posted on 10/28/2005 12:26:26 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Hey DIMS!

IT WILL BE A BLUE FITZMAS WITHOUT ROVE!"

7 posted on 10/28/2005 12:27:18 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear
Looking at what he indicted Libby on, I can't even imagine how little he has on Rove.

Libby was basically indicted for remembering a conversation with Russert slightly differently than the way Russert remembered it.

8 posted on 10/28/2005 12:27:58 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

I agree, It is not over, he could not get Rove...Yet, but he is being creative with a new Grand Jury and will get Karl if he can find a way to do it.


9 posted on 10/28/2005 12:28:15 PM PDT by inpajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Well we'll see... I'd sleep alot easier if I got a definitive statement that Fritz was closing up shop..

BTW...what does it mean for Rove to still be "under scrutiny" now?

10 posted on 10/28/2005 12:28:27 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Meanwhile one of the biggest scandals in this century gets underreported so we can key on this non-story.


11 posted on 10/28/2005 12:29:04 PM PDT by RunningJoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear
"It's not over yet. He'll charge Rove before he's through."

He'll have to - if one of those FBI files that Hillary illegally had upstairs in their private quarters pertained to Fitzgerald.

12 posted on 10/28/2005 12:29:06 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
That Fitzgerald came up empty on the original charge was a victory for everyone.

============

Office of the Deputy Attorney General Washington, D.C. 20530

December 30, 2003

The Honorable Patrick J. Fitzgerald United States Attorney 219 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60604

Dear Patrick,

By the authority vested in the Attorney General by law, including 28 U. S .C. §§ 509, 510, and 515, and in my capacity as Acting Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 508, I hereby delegate to you all the authority of the Attorney General with respect to the Department's investigation into the alleged unauthorized disclosure of a CIA employee's identity, and I direct you to exercise that authority as Special Counsel independent of the supervision or control of any officer of the Department.

/s/ James B. Comey James B. Comey Acting Attorney General

 

 

13 posted on 10/28/2005 12:29:57 PM PDT by ex-snook (Vote gridlock for the most conservative government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: podkane
I heard Al Frankenstein say today he just signed a two year lease in Washington. I didn't listen beyond that, my blood pressure was so high.

They were saying it was starting to feel a lot like Christmas.

14 posted on 10/28/2005 12:30:34 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Rove will be indicted later and both will be convicted by a D.C. jury who will then feel they got revenge for Bush blowing up the NO levees.

Both will be reversed upon appeal, but the rat point will be made.

15 posted on 10/28/2005 12:34:24 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Newsmax had another story about how this investigation lags behind the Whitewater one.

Fitz is a joke compared to the stuff Starr found.


16 posted on 10/28/2005 12:34:44 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Hear, hear. The libs were never after Libby (who?). From day one, they were after Rove. This is all about revenge for The Architect keeping them out of the White House. Because of The Architect's brilliance, the libs are in my opinion 18 months from seeing Roe v. Wade overturned. That's why they were literally crying in the streets at the end of election night, and it's why they're so rabid to go after Rove.

I love watching them crow now, because they're fooling themselves if they think this does anything for them. If anything, it only galvanizes our base to make sure to pay them back in future elections, and it won't do anything on that day in, say, early 2007 when the SCOTUS decision comes down that overturns Roe v. Wade.

"We congratulate Orlando for the kill and acknowledge that we are targeted. Though we are dead, our torpedoes were fired before your transmission...If we fired them right, any hits should be visible in your scope. They hit, we still win. Har, har."


17 posted on 10/28/2005 12:38:25 PM PDT by Windcatcher (Earth to libs: MARXISM DOESN'T SELL HERE. Try somewhere else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RunningJoke

Sandy Burglar? Oil for food? CIA plot against the president?
I know, it's ridiculous!! The LSM makes me so mad.


18 posted on 10/28/2005 12:42:28 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher

The Liberals just don't get it yet. WE determine who will be the Majority. Not Fitz, not Earle. We don't like them using the Courts in a political witchhunt. This only galvanizes our side. If Bush nominates Alito or another fine Judge, Dems are toast. We'll be stoked for '06.

They dig their own grave with this injustice towards Libby.

Though I agree strongly Rove was the target, they didn't get him, they trumped weak charges on Libby. There is not joy in Liberalville tonight.


19 posted on 10/28/2005 12:46:41 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dead
Libby was basically indicted for remembering a conversation with Russert slightly differently than the way Russert remembered it.

No. There is more to it than that.

20 posted on 10/28/2005 12:48:01 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson