Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delay moves to Dismiss Second Indictment
Powerline ^ | 10/17/2005 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 10/17/2005 10:25:59 PM PDT by CurlyDave

John Hinderaker over at Powerline has copies of a letter to Ronnie Earle, and one of two motions to quash the two new indictments of Tom Delay.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/

"Earlier today, Tom DeLay's lawyer, Dick DeGuerin, moved for dismissal of the second indictment which was procured by prosecutor Ronnie Earle. Here is DeGuerin's letter to Earle that accompanied the motion:

"The judge who will hear DeLay's motions is a MoveOn.org supporter. But Ronnie Earle will have to come up with some answers if he wants to keep his prosecution of Tom DeLay alive."

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: delay; indictment; powerline
I read the letter and the motion and it looks pretty good to me as an interested lay person.

Do we have any lawyers who can comment on Tom DeLay's chance of success with this motion?

Shouldn't the Judge recuse himself since he is a MoveOn.org supporter?

1 posted on 10/17/2005 10:26:01 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Yes he should recuse.. I wonder if MSM will ignore this one... it's a huge elephant in the room. someone gonna pick it up sooner or later... lmao


2 posted on 10/17/2005 10:28:32 PM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
"But Ronnie Earle will have to come up with some answers if he wants to keep his prosecution of Tom DeLay alive."

He's already toast - the only reason he was doing this was because a film was being made of it, starring him.

See the DUmmie FUnnies for today - there's an article about it:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1503960/posts
3 posted on 10/17/2005 10:31:55 PM PDT by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Do we have any lawyers who can comment on Tom DeLay's chance of success with this motion?

Aren't the people who run Powerline lawyers? Would they post information about this rumored motion if it didn't have a good chance of succeeding?

4 posted on 10/17/2005 10:40:55 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Aren't the people who run Powerline lawyers? Would they post information about this rumored motion if it didn't have a good chance of succeeding?

The motion exists. They post it just as reference material. They also poseted the letter that accompanied a subpoena to Earle, to compel him to appear, since the motion for dismissal rings of prosecutorial misconduct.

I looked at the case on the merits, and Ronnie Earle seems to be blowing smoke. I have no idea if the prosecutorial misconduct charge has anything going for it, haven't reviewed it.

5 posted on 10/17/2005 10:45:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Shouldn't the Judge recuse himself since he is a MoveOn.org supporter?

Do vampires sell garlic under the noon time sun?

6 posted on 10/17/2005 10:58:11 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

A moveon.org member is, by nature, illogical and, as George Washington identified in his Farewell Address, consumed by party spirit. Expect them to embrace all mischevious deeds while claiming innocence.


7 posted on 10/17/2005 11:28:20 PM PDT by Loud Mime (Hatred is the foundation of socialist movements, conceit is the motivator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Yes we do have attorney's at FR. All info on this DeLay case and all DeLay Indictment Pre-Trial Documents are being maintained here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~flattorney/


8 posted on 10/18/2005 12:02:35 AM PDT by flattorney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Federal Judges (and employees of the federal judiciary) are forbidden to donate to or be involved in political campaigns or organizations. I'm surprised they don't have something similar for State judges.
9 posted on 10/18/2005 3:20:45 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson