I read the letter and the motion and it looks pretty good to me as an interested lay person.
Do we have any lawyers who can comment on Tom DeLay's chance of success with this motion?
Shouldn't the Judge recuse himself since he is a MoveOn.org supporter?
1 posted on
10/17/2005 10:26:01 PM PDT by
CurlyDave
To: CurlyDave
Yes he should recuse.. I wonder if MSM will ignore this one... it's a huge elephant in the room. someone gonna pick it up sooner or later... lmao
2 posted on
10/17/2005 10:28:32 PM PDT by
Cinnamon
To: CurlyDave
"But Ronnie Earle will have to come up with some answers if he wants to keep his prosecution of Tom DeLay alive."
He's already toast - the only reason he was doing this was because a film was being made of it, starring him.
See the DUmmie FUnnies for today - there's an article about it:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1503960/posts
3 posted on
10/17/2005 10:31:55 PM PDT by
decal
(Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
To: CurlyDave
Do we have any lawyers who can comment on Tom DeLay's chance of success with this motion? Aren't the people who run Powerline lawyers? Would they post information about this rumored motion if it didn't have a good chance of succeeding?
4 posted on
10/17/2005 10:40:55 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: CurlyDave
Shouldn't the Judge recuse himself since he is a MoveOn.org supporter?Do vampires sell garlic under the noon time sun?
6 posted on
10/17/2005 10:58:11 PM PDT by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: CurlyDave
To: CurlyDave
Federal Judges (and employees of the federal judiciary) are forbidden to donate to or be involved in political campaigns or organizations. I'm surprised they don't have something similar for State judges.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson