Posted on 08/02/2005 12:00:01 PM PDT by LibWhacker
Methane on Mars may be produced at rates 3000 times higher than previously thought and partially destroyed by dust storms, controversial new research suggests.
The work is sure to reignite the debate over a possible biological origin for the gas, but another team reports that subsurface volcanism alone - and not life - can account for the gas.
Sunlight is thought to destroy methane molecules in Mars's atmosphere over about 300 years. So recent discoveries of the gas by space- and ground-based instruments suggested it is actively being replenished by geological processes or – possibly – living microbes.
The mystery deepened when some researchers claimed to find methane concentrated in certain locations on Mars. That is a puzzle because atmospheric currents are expected to spread the gas evenly around the planet in a matter of weeks or months.
Now, a team led by Michael Mumma of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, US, reports further evidence of the phenomenon. Using an infrared telescope in Hawaii and the Gemini South telescope in Chile, the group found concentrations of methane ranging from zero to more than 250 parts per billion across Mars.
Such a drastic difference suggests something must be destroying the methane before it can be mixed uniformly through the atmosphere, says Mumma. And if it is destroyed in one month, he says, that implies it must be replenished 3000 times faster than current estimates suggest.
Dust storms
"There's a very significant increase required. But I think it's premature to draw conclusions [about a biological source],” says Mumma, who will present the results at a planetary sciences meeting in Cambridge, UK, in September 2005.
Still, he says the research begs the question of what - besides sunlight - could be destroying the methane. Sushil Atreya of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, US, and colleagues may have an answer and will be presenting their work at the same meeting.
They say dust particles that collide during Martian dust storms can become charged, with smaller particles gaining electrons and rising on air currents. This creates a large electric field that can accelerate electrons until they break apart water molecules in the atmosphere. The detritus from this smash-up can then oxidise, or destroy, methane molecules.
It is not clear how large this dust-storm effect is, "but it does establish for the first time that there are other mechanisms for producing oxidants", Mumma notes.
Welling magma
Jim Lyons, a planetary scientist at the University of California in Los Angeles, US, agrees. "It doesn't look to me like you have enough dust activity to produce the electric fields you want to produce," he told New Scientist. "But it's probably the best idea if we really do need a mechanism for destroying methane in the atmosphere."
But he is sceptical that any methane exists on Mars - much less in different concentrations across its surface. Still, he and colleagues have just published a study showing that geological activity could explain any methane that is present.
Recent high-resolution images of Mars reveal crater-free surfaces that may have been covered by lava within the last 2 million years. That suggests magma could still be flowing below the surface today, says Lyons.
He and colleagues say magma welling up about 10 kilometres below the surface could melt any subsurface water ice and infuse it with carbon dioxide. As the water cools, it would release methane to seep upwards into the atmosphere.
He says a patch of subsurface magma just 1 km wide could account for methane at the 10 parts per billion level seen by some groups, and that a larger patch could account for Mumma's reported values.
"Methane on Mars may be produced at rates 3000 times higher than previously thought..."
Sheesh, don't light a match...
If there is methane on mars, it means there are cows on mars.
Or catch of whiff of the local air and ask, "OK, Who dealt it?"
"If there is methane on mars, it means there are cows on mars."
Alright... who lost track of Rosie O'Donnell again?!
or mexican food
Or my ex-husband is on Mars.
Taco Bell on Mars..........Run for the Border!.........
Yes, martian cows eat dust, a well known scientific fact. We all know cows here on earth should all be destroyed because they are damaging the planet beyond repair. Mars was undoubtedly destroyed by methane producing cows, the only creatures to survive the cow holocaust.
Don't look at me. I only produce methane on this planet. :)
It's Bush's fault...
Actually, it's all part of Karl Rove's master plan. The pieces are finally coming together......
Yes, Irene, there is something to intelligent design after all... And God wants us to go to Mars!
Somewhere in here there's a nub of an idea for a Gary Larsen "Far Side" cartoon. I'm envisioning a heard of martian cows hiding under a cliff every time the Martian Observer overflies their grazing area. Caption: The real source of Martian methane!
You may get a kick out of this.
LOLOL! I like that. Larsen would, too. :-)
Thanks for posting that. It's COOL! What do they surmise the ice is made of?
susie
It was the only place I could go to find some peace from your griping azz. hehehe
Methane is odorless.
Pull my finger...
It's water ice.
Really? Frozen H20?? Wow.
susie
Touche - good one.
Who farted?
tanks
There is Carbon dioxide ice on Mars, but the team that photographed this said it is water ice.
NASA Researches Claim Evidenc[e] of Present Life on Mars
Space News | Feb. 16, 2005 | Brian Berger
Posted on 02/16/2005 2:35:13 PM EST by PresbyRev
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1344592/posts
The Martian Methane SurpriseThere was a major dust storm in December of 2003, and it raised the scattering level from the surface to a higher altitude - probably about 20 kilometers above the surface - and this reduced the signature of both water and methane spectral lines of reflected light. Those conditions continued until June of this year. That means that when Mars Express tried to measure methane, they were looking against that background of dust and airborne ice. That would've affected their measurements and made derived abundances appear smaller than they would otherwise be... But in March 2003, the martian atmosphere was fairly clear. We were able to measure both water vapor and methane in the same spectra at the same time. We compared the water at each position with the amount detected by the TES spectrometer on the orbiting Mars Global Surveyor... Our water abundances were a factor of three smaller than those of TES. We always have to add a reference level to our spectral measurements to get the true value. I didn't add those numbers in my presentation this year [at the DPS conference]. Instead, I showed the minimum amount we were seeing.
Interview with Mike Mumma
Astrobiology Magazine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.