Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly SETTLES!

Posted on 10/28/2004 3:50:44 PM PDT by Destro

Just reported on NBC News


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adultery; aloofahwhere; antiamerican; apoxonbothhouses; arrogantblowhard; awalkonthewildside; bigbucks; billclinton; billoreilly; cheater; criminal; democrat; deviance; dollarbillo; dumberthanowlshit; eraseyourspeeddial; exaggeratedmanhood; extortionskank; factorihardlyknowher; factorthongsonsale; falafel; flyspeckfilth; gap; getyourfreakon; heybabywannaboogie; hypocrit; idiot; isthisabadconnection; isthisthebloviator; keepitpithy; layofftheswiftiesbor; lecher; lewdandlascivious; liar; liberal; liberalhoochie; likegladiatormovies; loofah; lookingoutforyou; lowlife; marvalbertfanclub; monicalewinsky; nakedmanonlineone; nastyasyouwanttobe; notafactoranylonger; ohreallyoreilly; oneringydingy; oopsyouhavetapes; oreilly; paulajones; pervert; philanderer; phonesex; pompousvilepig; pornography; presstitutes; sexualharassment; soulmateofdickmorris; spankingtheomonkey; spankmehard; stunemybeeberplease; thegosinzone; themoskinzone; toesucker; whatareyouwearing; whoslookingoutforyou; wiveswithvibrators
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-279 next last
To: sarasota

You know the routine: You'll never hear any details. I'm imagining that O'R decided to pay her off rather than allow her to accuse him of doing things that will stick to him whether he did them or not. I really don't like Bill, but I'm going to assume that he is not guilty of whatever he was being accused of. His ego and love of his stature outweighs his love of sex, I think.


61 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:00 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

>>That likely means Mackris gets little or nothing.

No. The vast majority of cases settle, some little, some big. This one is just higher profile than most because a celebrity is involved.


62 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:02 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious0

Amen....I don't Juan is a cakeboy actually, he's just stupid....btw...."suck a faggot".....I'm still ROTFLMAO!

Salute!!!!!!!!!!!!


63 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:09 PM PDT by wardaddy (The only thing we share with collectivists and ragheads is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Destro
BOR's first interviews as the new CBS anchor will be Clinton and Morris.
64 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:19 PM PDT by ml1954 (Kerry, A Legend In His Own Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I think the big "O" is toast.

Not likely. His ratings have not suffered at all.

65 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:28 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
So I guess this is the most ridiculous item of the day?
66 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:33 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (What does John Kerry hunt with? Spitballs???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lx

"Someone will end up with the tapes. I'm sure a respected journalist like Larry Flynt will get them.
"

I don't think so. The settlement terms no doubt dealt with any tapes, which were probably turned over to O'Reilly's attorneys.

Bill will probably lose his Fox News job, but they may offer him a reality show: "Bill O'Reilly's Porn Calls" or something like that.

After all, Fox, the network, has the sleaziest shows currently on television. Personally, I think the Fox network is tarnishes by the trash they broadcast as entertainment.


67 posted on 10/28/2004 4:00:50 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RedRepublic

Settles, means he paid something. We may or may not ever know. i think he prefers just to have it go away.


68 posted on 10/28/2004 4:01:03 PM PDT by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Settling is good. The alleged victim has a bulldog of a lawyer who prides himself in never settling a case and in getting astronomical awards. So if he let her settle for anything, it meant the woman's case was very weak to begin with. They were asking for what? $60 million, as I recall. Throw a mil or two her way as nuisance fee and end it fast, say I.


69 posted on 10/28/2004 4:01:21 PM PDT by Veto! (Kerry wears a tutu, TeRAYza wears the pants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Destro

We can ask the question: who says talk is cheap?


70 posted on 10/28/2004 4:01:45 PM PDT by matchwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

"I'm curious what the settlement actually was. I'd like to see it in print. "

You're never going to know. It's all been settled and nobody's going to say a word. She got bucks. O'Reilly got off. And there it is.


71 posted on 10/28/2004 4:02:06 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Highwayman53
"O'Reily's wife can't be all too happy about this. I always thought Bill was a slime ball."

We seem to be getting a lot of newbies like you lately.

72 posted on 10/28/2004 4:02:14 PM PDT by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I can remember when calls were only a dime.

The calling plans are so confusing now. I remember my first $4 million phone bill.

73 posted on 10/28/2004 4:02:30 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die for the Kerry campaign?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I implied nothing. Your mind manufactured what you thought you read. Both sides settled. Both sides agfree not to talk about the settlement.

What say you, now?

74 posted on 10/28/2004 4:02:30 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

It had to be at least $145K. That's how much Olbermann had raised so far to pay her to give HIM the tapes.


75 posted on 10/28/2004 4:03:03 PM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

"So I guess this is the most ridiculous item of the day?"

Pretty much.


76 posted on 10/28/2004 4:03:04 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
O'Reilly got off.

That was alleged, anyway.

77 posted on 10/28/2004 4:03:19 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I implied nothing. Your mind manufactured what you thought you read. Both sides settled.

Then the title should read: "O'Reilly-Mackris settle."

78 posted on 10/28/2004 4:03:39 PM PDT by sinkspur ("If you're always talking, I can't get in a word edge-wise." God Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

"all Parties and their representatives have agreed that all information relating to the cases shall remain confidential."

Usually means the defendant in the primary action (O'Reilly) shelled out some bucks, but figured if he (or Fox) is going to pay for it, they might as well get something in return - silence.


79 posted on 10/28/2004 4:03:44 PM PDT by sitetest (Why does everyone get so uptight about toasted heretics??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Statement from Ronald Green, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 28, 2004--The Parties regret that this matter has caused tremendous pain, and they have agreed to settle. All cases and claims have been withdrawn and all Parties have agreed that there was no wrongdoing whatsoever by Mr. O'Reilly, Ms. Mackris, or Ms. Mackris' counsel, Benedict P. Morelli & Associates. We now withdraw any assertion that any extortion by Ms. Mackris, Mr. Morelli, or Morelli & Associates occurred. Out of respect for their families and privacy, all Parties and their representatives have agreed that all information relating to the cases shall remain confidential.


80 posted on 10/28/2004 4:03:50 PM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson