Skip to comments.
Attitude adjustment at TSA
The Washington Times ^
| Feb 25, 2004
| Bob Barr
Posted on 02/25/2004 8:32:49 AM PST by neverdem
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:13:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The wonderful folks at the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; arbitraryfines; cappsii; fines; privacy; terrorism; tsa
1
posted on
02/25/2004 8:32:50 AM PST
by
neverdem
To: Henrietta
Ping
2
posted on
02/25/2004 8:46:50 AM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: neverdem
The jerks at TSA no doubt took lessons from the jackbooted thugs that protect her heinous THE Hildabeaste.
3
posted on
02/25/2004 9:07:17 AM PST
by
upchuck
(Ta-ray-za now gets to execute her "maiming of choice." I'm hoping for eye gouging, how 'bout you?)
To: Allan; Shermy; pokerbuddy2
Ping.
4
posted on
02/25/2004 9:07:37 AM PST
by
Mitchell
To: neverdem
Bob Barr is now probably on some unseen TSA hit list and will be given a thorough search next time he flies.
5
posted on
02/25/2004 9:36:04 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Looking for new tagline, Bush campaign silence broken on Monday. Let's go get the Dems!)
To: neverdem
the water in this pot IS NOT heating up -- it's just fine, thanks...
6
posted on
02/25/2004 9:39:32 AM PST
by
LN2Campy
To: CedarDave
the tsa can probably fine him for "nonphysical disruption" just for writing his article.
the fine will be about $2,000.
i mean, disruption doesn't necessarily have to take place at the airport, especially if it's nonphysical.
7
posted on
02/25/2004 9:44:30 AM PST
by
drhogan
To: neverdem
Whiteshirt Alert!
Hope Bob Barr doesn't plan on flying any time soon.
8
posted on
02/25/2004 10:08:06 AM PST
by
jjm2111
To: neverdem
A fine of up to $1,500 can be levied (after the fact, of course) against an air traveler for something called "nonphysical interference with screening."...One of eight "aggravating factors" listed in the new Guidelines is the "attitude of violator." Don't sass your masters or you'll feel the sting of the whip, filthy peasant.
9
posted on
02/25/2004 10:14:08 AM PST
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
To: neverdem
I'm sure glad its professionals doing this.
Just think how bad it would be if GW and his legislative cronies continued to allow those evil unprofessional capitalist to run things.
10
posted on
02/25/2004 10:35:12 AM PST
by
stljoe71
To: neverdem
To: Slings and Arrows
LOL
12
posted on
02/25/2004 3:05:30 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Thank'ee. Think I should have that put on a T-shirt for the next time I fly? ;-)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
