He's not a liberal, if that's what you're trying to imply. Most of his stuff at Legal Insurrection is very good.
Posted on 09/11/2012 10:16:12 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
So is the panic over yet?
It shoud be, because there never was a reason for panic to begin with. Operation Demoralize went viral at the urging of the mainstream media, some Republicans and conservatives caught the fever, and for a weekend people lost their minds.
Remember what got us here. Has any of that changed?
Joel Pollak posts at Breitbart.com, We have not yet begun to fight:
But we have not yet begun to fight–and if we go down, we go down fighting.
Pollak links to this video of Andrew Breitbart (language warning):
(VIDEO AT LINK)
The Dog Whistle election, that’s for sure. All of this was predictable, so don’t fall for it.
Keep pushing with everything you have. It’s working, or the other side wouldn’t feel the need to keep telling you it’s not, they’d be content to let the election play out.
Update:
(VIDEO AT LINK)
Stop.
There are a lot of high profile dems who are going to vote for Rommey because they believe Obama is destroying the country.
There are people who are afraid to state plainly that they will be voting for Romney and claim they will vote Obama.
I was shocked this summer by dems who are following this strategy.
In a lot of places the Democrat party is a religion. You toe the party line no matter how much you disagree with what is going on. So they will mouth all the party loyalty slogans until they get in the privacy of the voting booth. These are the Democrats that 0bama scorned as "clinging to their God and their Guns" in 2008.
In 2008 0bama was a blank slate who these voters could write anything they wanted on. Now he is a known quantity.
In Wisconsin a lot of these people either stayed home or voted for Walker. Going to be interesting to see if they bother to show up or if the vote for 0.
The author of this piece is an associate professor of law at Cornell!
I admit I didn't even remember it until last night. I allowed myself to get swept up in the swiftly-moving waters of the agenda set by the Mouthpiece Media.
He's not a liberal, if that's what you're trying to imply. Most of his stuff at Legal Insurrection is very good.
I’m not “trying to imply” anything. I conveyed a piece of factual information which I found remarkable.
What you infer is up to you.
What you infer is up to you. Okay. Remarkable in what way? All you did was add some exclamation points to your factual information. What were you trying to say?
It wasn't my factual information. It came from the article linked in the excerpt.
I forgot that I had posted to you before today and wasn’t able to get through to you then either. When people are purposefully thickheaded, it is useless to even try. I will make a point not to bother in the future.
Why do you need to “get through” to me?
LOL
Indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.