Women can be stupid, but this one is sticking with Cain.
This cracker is clingin to Cain.
Three clues:
her publication
female with three names
the qualifer (her former “yob”)
LOLOLOL.
So Axelrod only had to come up with 4 women with dubious claims and that’s the magic number to get rid of the competition? He must be laughing at how easy this is.
That what made this smear so effective.
I think just about every woman has been sexually harassed or assaulted at some point in her life. Maybe not at work but in school, in public where ever.
I think there is a natural assumption in women to believe the accusers in these cases since it matches with her personal experiences.
Yes, I think this trend is troublesome but not fatal. As this story goes on and the facts comes out, I suspect a lot of that suspicion of Cain in women’s minds is going to be assuaged.
As for Parker, why anyone bothers paying any attention to her is a mystery. She is as genuine a Conservative as a $3 bill is real money
Done defending him, lady? Did you ever support him in the first place? I sincerely doubt it.
And if you had, there’s no way that US News would have asked you to write this article in the first place.
Kathy’s got her bloomers in a bunch.
Yes, still wavering about these accusations! BUT, if I look at who and what the accusers are, it is very easy to have doubts. Seems they are Chicagans and/or with ties to the Democrats. A coincidence - not likely?
Seems too suspicious to me but of course, the sheeple that watch the standard MSM stations will never know the difference.
Politics is ugly and seems to be getting just a bit more ugly.
I wouldn’t put too much into this. Well know what we stand to lose if Romney gets the nomination. Nothing. I like Newt, one of my personal choices, but I’m concerned. His working knowledge of our political landscape is second to none, but his biggest drawback is that he lacks mass appeal. Obama is a perfect example of how appeal can trump substance; radical as hell, zero experience, but he connected with voters. Newt could win the nomination - I’d support him 100% - but I have doubts he will strike a chord with voters outside of the GOP base. Fair or not, the MSM will stereotype him as the old, boring, elitist Republican & it’s only a matter of time before they air his dirty laundry. Reagan was equally intelligent, but his passion & charisma - his innate ability to relate to the common man - is why he captured independents and “Reagan Democrats.” People want to be inspired, not talked down to. If it wasn’t for the media’s attacks on Cain, who led nationally (still does) & Iowa by double digits, would Newt even be in contention as the choice of his own party? Cain has the greatest appeal of any GOP candidate to reach across party lines and the left knows this. They will do all they can to destroy him. The only question is...why do we conservatives help them fulfill their agenda? Only we can elect our nominee!
Yap, yap, yap, yap, yap.....
Try to see the choices you have, without Mama Fizzly.
Good. Now pick one.
That's what you need to do.
We obviously don't run in the same circles since 100% of the women and men I've discussed this with are very upset with the MSM and the broads..........and a number of those women are democraps.
FWIW, their major complaint is men now being afraid to offer them compliments on their looks and dress for fear of being accused of harrassment......and rightfully so.
He goes up against Obummer and Cain gets my vote!
And nobody sees a problem with this?
Why I am done with US News and World Report.
“Mary Kate Cary
Mary Kate Cary is a former White House speechwriter for President George H.W. Bush. She currently writes speeches for political and business leaders.” A RINO BUSHBOT(ROMMENYBOT) TURD!
No, they've sold their stories to the MSM... tabloids have a better track record of reliability than the MSM, and they actually get to the truth, especially when the MSM refuses to report on a matter reflecting badly on demoncrats, ie, Edwards. You want the truth? It will never appear as you hope to hear it... as a general rule, when the MSM puts stuff out there to slime a conservative, you can bet it will be presented in the worst possible light, however true or false it may be... Question, why the hell should anyone swallow, hook line and sinker, what the MSM puts out there? Its called baiting... to see if they can actually catch you making a misstep trying to respond to their "BLOCKBUSTER NEWS"... probably the worst thing Cain ever did was try to respond before catching his wits about him, you know, "good guys always finish last", that sort of thing...