Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomy Picture of the Day 7-08-02
NASA ^ | 7-08-02 | Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell

Posted on 07/07/2002 10:26:43 PM PDT by petuniasevan

Astronomy Picture of the Day

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2002 July 8
See Explanation.  Clicking on the picture will download
 the highest resolution version available.

Weighing Empty Space
Credit & Copyright: Bell Labs-Lucent Technologies, AURA, NOAO, NSF

Explanation: Sometimes staring into empty space is useful. Pictured above is a region of sky that was picked because it had, well, nothing: no bright stars, no bright galaxies, and no picturesque nebulas. What could not be avoided, however, were a few stars in our own Galaxy, and many distant galaxies strewn across the universe. Now the more distant galaxies have their light slightly deflected by the gravity of more nearby galaxies, causing them to appear slightly distorted. By analyzing these gravitational lens distortions, nearby mass concentrations can be found, regardless of how bright they appear. Using this method, astronomers can now weigh entire clusters of galaxies and search for large groupings of relatively dark matter. Circled in the lower right of the above image is a cluster of galaxies that was found not by its light, but by its mass.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; bend; cluster; darkmatter; discovery; distant; distortion; galaxies; gravitation; gravity; image; lens; light; mass; photography; stars; weight
Astronomy Fun Fact:

Yes indeed! The force of gravity does bend light. It's called gravitational lensing.
Here's a dramatic example, courtesy of the Hubble Space Telescope:

See the strange curved streaks and arcs in the photo?
Those are the distorted images of galaxies on the FAR SIDE of the visible cluster.

Get on the APOD PING list!

1 posted on 07/07/2002 10:26:44 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MozartLover; Joan912; NovemberCharlie; snowfox; Dawgsquat; viligantcitizen; theDentist; grlfrnd; ...
APOD PING!
2 posted on 07/07/2002 10:27:54 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
wow! neat stuff!
3 posted on 07/07/2002 11:05:47 PM PDT by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Whoa! Amazing!
4 posted on 07/08/2002 1:25:24 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
morning bump
5 posted on 07/08/2002 5:11:57 AM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
MORE MORE MORE Awsome!
6 posted on 07/08/2002 5:40:32 AM PDT by BossyRoofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Hubble, Hubble! ;^)
7 posted on 07/08/2002 5:53:32 AM PDT by mikrofon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Sorry to be a pest, but, does gravity bend light or does gravity bend space which thereby causes light to travel that "bent" path?
8 posted on 07/08/2002 6:08:52 AM PDT by Sock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Thanks!
9 posted on 07/08/2002 8:44:50 AM PDT by MozartLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
More great information.
Thanks for the ping.
10 posted on 07/08/2002 10:11:08 AM PDT by sistergoldenhair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
WOW!!

That gravitational lens pic is AMAZING!
11 posted on 07/08/2002 11:25:41 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; petuniasevan
Good call hop. Indeed. If we recall, Hubble's main lens was manufactured improperly (another NASA "management success" story), requiring subsequent STS missions to fix the focus with corrective lens. Well, "fixed" as much as was possible.

Anyone who has had trouble with their own eyesight can recognize the blurring affect of inexact vision. While this photo may provide evidence of gravity bending light, I caution against accepting the photo (in reply 1) as proof.

12 posted on 07/08/2002 1:22:42 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Luckily, I am unlikely to be put in the position of having to adjudicate this controversy.

I'm still amazed. ;^)
13 posted on 07/08/2002 1:34:33 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sock
Yeah, I need to be more exact here.

The massive body (or group of bodies) acts like a lens, with an "index of refraction" that reflects the effect of spacetime curvature on the light path.

In English: Yes, it's space itself which is distorted; thus the light path is bent. As for the bending process, which is "refraction", try this. Place a pencil in a glass of water. The water's surface seems to split the pencil into adjacent halves.

14 posted on 07/08/2002 9:43:27 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
It's not the only example. There are many different examples, like this one:


This picture points out multiple images occurring in the cluster Cl 0024+1654.

Did you know that even before HST's optics were fixed (dumb oversight not to test, I know), it could image various objects as well as many Earth-based scopes? The Earth's atmospheric turbulence limits our ground-based imaging efforts.

15 posted on 07/08/2002 10:00:18 PM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Now this, to me, is a stunning picture.

Oh yes -- the primary, longed for reason to get telescopes into space.

A buddy of mine helped assure Hubble's success in nearly every other way. (I helped make GRO the success it was. You want not to hear my opinion of NASA choosing not to reboost its altitude. They spent almost a billion extra of our tax dollars just to make it fit into a shuttle -- a decision that inadvertently caused the delay of its launch due to Challenger -- and then abandoned it.)

16 posted on 07/08/2002 10:50:00 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson