| Transcript |
| 0:04 | · | hello it's Scott Manley here it has been |
| 0:06 | · | an extraordinarily exciting and uh |
| 0:09 | · | confusing last few days for fans of |
| 0:11 | · | spaceflight as we watched the |
| 0:13 | · | culmination of the im1 mission from |
| 0:17 | · | intuitive machines carrying the space |
| 0:19 | · | probe adicus to the lunar surface it |
| 0:22 | · | launched just over a week ago on a |
| 0:24 | · | falcon 9 a commercial rocket right and |
| 0:27 | · | it's important to note that this is a |
| 0:29 | · | commercial lunar Mission uh intuitive |
| 0:31 | · | machines is a private company they did a |
| 0:33 | · | lot of the development on their own |
| 0:35 | · | albeit with some occasional NASA funding |
| 0:38 | · | this Mission the anchor customer was |
| 0:40 | · | NASA who spent on something like $120 |
| 0:44 | · | million for their payloads to go on this |
| 0:47 | · | spacecraft to the moon but they were not |
| 0:49 | · | by any means the only customers on this |
| 0:52 | · | Mission as it happens this was the |
| 0:54 | · | second mission of the Year following |
| 0:56 | · | this uh commercial model from NASA the |
| 0:58 | · | first being astrobotics paragr Lander |
| 1:01 | · | which launched on the first Vulcan |
| 1:02 | · | rocket and then promptly overpressured |
| 1:05 | · | its propellant tanks due to a valve |
| 1:06 | · | malfunction swung around the moon and |
| 1:09 | · | then burned up in the atmosphere and to |
| 1:11 | · | astrobotics credit while they didn't |
| 1:13 | · | make it to the surface of the Moon they |
| 1:14 | · | got a lot of love from the community |
| 1:16 | · | because of their openness and they're |
| 1:18 | · | willing to share details of spacecraft |
| 1:21 | · | operations even after it was clear it |
| 1:23 | · | was never going to make to the surface |
| 1:25 | · | of the Moon but this meant that adicus |
| 1:27 | · | had a chance to be the first American |
| 1:29 | · | spacecraft to soft land on the surface |
| 1:31 | · | of the Moon in 50 years NASA had of |
| 1:35 | · | course got sidetracked by that whole |
| 1:37 | · | Space Shuttle and space station thing |
| 1:39 | · | they had launched a few really cool |
| 1:41 | · | space probes around the moon but they |
| 1:42 | · | hadn't bothered to land anything softly |
| 1:45 | · | and this Lander in particular could |
| 1:47 | · | trace its Heritage back over a decade to |
| 1:50 | · | the Google lunar X prize some of the |
| 1:52 | · | people who worked on it some of the |
| 1:54 | · | hardware that was developed goes back to |
| 1:57 | · | armadillo Aerospace which if you |
| 1:59 | · | remember is on CarMax company he's the |
| 2:01 | · | guy that created doom and then after |
| 2:03 | · | making a ton of money off a quake |
| 2:04 | · | decided that he wanted to get into |
| 2:06 | · | rocketry and then lost it all and you |
| 2:08 | · | know that's how these things go this is |
| 2:10 | · | a video from armadillo's old YouTube |
| 2:12 | · | page showing the test of a pressure-fed |
| 2:15 | · | methane oxygen engine and that is hugely |
| 2:19 | · | important because while people have been |
| 2:21 | · | sending spacecraft to the moon for 60 |
| 2:23 | · | years nobody has tried to land a |
| 2:26 | · | spacecraft on the moon using a cryogenic |
| 2:29 | · | Eng Eng all the spacecraft have been |
| 2:31 | · | using highly toxic hypergolic propellant |
| 2:34 | · | which is great because you don't need an |
| 2:36 | · | ignition system but it's not so good |
| 2:38 | · | because it's just really nasty to work |
| 2:41 | · | with so anyway this engine was developed |
| 2:43 | · | for Project Morpheus which it actually |
| 2:45 | · | began as Project M which was supposed to |
| 2:47 | · | be like a NASA Skunk Works project to |
| 2:50 | · | try and put a robonaut on the surface of |
| 2:53 | · | the Moon after a couple of years that |
| 2:54 | · | got split into two projects a sort of |
| 2:56 | · | second generation robonaut which went to |
| 2:58 | · | the space station and Project Morpheus |
| 3:01 | · | which was this Lander That was supposed |
| 3:03 | · | to demonstrate lunar Landing |
| 3:05 | · | Technologies on Earth it was supposed to |
| 3:07 | · | demonstrate new new sensor system |
| 3:09 | · | onboard autonomous Hazard detection and |
| 3:12 | · | avoidance and that's what this bit of |
| 3:14 | · | Hardware is on the side here it's |
| 3:16 | · | scanning The Landing site looking for |
| 3:18 | · | those rocks and trying to figure out |
| 3:20 | · | where the Lander can touch down again |
| 3:22 | · | this was a small lowbudget technology |
| 3:25 | · | demonstrator performed in collaboration |
| 3:28 | · | with a commercial organization like |
| 3:30 | · | armadillo and a number of the people |
| 3:31 | · | that worked on this would go on to be |
| 3:34 | · | part of intuitive machines to develop |
| 3:36 | · | their Lander so with that in mind we had |
| 3:39 | · | been following this mission for the last |
| 3:40 | · | week or so and where they quickly |
| 3:42 | · | established Communications and |
| 3:44 | · | demonstrated the ability to ignite and |
| 3:46 | · | operate their methane engine in deep |
| 3:48 | · | space and this was a first while we have |
| 3:50 | · | had a Chinese rocket that successfully |
| 3:53 | · | launched to orbit using meth methyl o it |
| 3:56 | · | didn't actually ignite its engine until |
| 3:58 | · | it was outside the at so technically |
| 4:00 | · | this was a win and then just in case |
| 4:02 | · | there was any doubters out there I |
| 4:04 | · | believe they ignited their engine |
| 4:07 | · | further from the earth than anyone had |
| 4:09 | · | ever ignited a cryogenic engine so they |
| 4:11 | · | were absolutely cementing their place in |
| 4:14 | · | uh you know the record books as true |
| 4:16 | · | space innovators going out there with |
| 4:19 | · | those engines that don't have the |
| 4:21 | · | hypergolic propellants and that's |
| 4:23 | · | something that NASA is absolutely |
| 4:25 | · | relying on for its lunar lander both of |
| 4:28 | · | the spacecraft that being chosen for the |
| 4:30 | · | human Landing system are going to use |
| 4:32 | · | cryogenic propellants uh starship's |
| 4:34 | · | obviously going to use methane and blue |
| 4:37 | · | origin spacecraft is going to use hydr |
| 4:39 | · | loocks both of them are going to have to |
| 4:41 | · | maintain cryogenic propellant in flight |
| 4:44 | · | on orbit for a long period of time and |
| 4:47 | · | this is something that was actually |
| 4:48 | · | previously demonstrated I think on a |
| 4:51 | · | mission to the space station they had a |
| 4:53 | · | module which was fixed to the side and |
| 4:54 | · | it basically kept some cryogenic |
| 4:56 | · | propellant cooled using a cryocooler and |
| 5:00 | · | passive Cooling and control systems for |
| 5:02 | · | a long time so this was something of a |
| 5:04 | · | Next Step where they were able to |
| 5:05 | · | actually use the engine for all their |
| 5:08 | · | operations in space and maybe one day we |
| 5:10 | · | can abandon these hypergolic after all |
| 5:12 | · | they're expensive they're toxic and of |
| 5:15 | · | course methane and oxygen are pretty |
| 5:17 | · | easy to produce uh in situ across the |
| 5:20 | · | solar system on Wednesday the spacecraft |
| 5:22 | · | successfully entered orbit and on |
| 5:24 | · | Thursday we were watching a live stream |
| 5:27 | · | of it descending and this can animation |
| 5:30 | · | from a year ago is vastly more |
| 5:33 | · | interesting than what the live stream |
| 5:34 | · | brought us I mean we didn't have any |
| 5:36 | · | live camera views which is |
| 5:38 | · | understandable given bandwidth |
| 5:39 | · | constraints but we didn't have any |
| 5:41 | · | Telemetry and we certainly didn't have |
| 5:43 | · | any animation that was being created |
| 5:45 | · | from that Telemetry we had a bunch of |
| 5:46 | · | Talking Heads and a clock counting down |
| 5:50 | · | and to be honest the best part was when |
| 5:52 | · | we would actually get live audio from |
| 5:54 | · | the control room and all this sort of |
| 5:56 | · | glossed over the fact that there had |
| 5:58 | · | been some serious drama behind the |
| 6:00 | · | scenes some top tier you know problem |
| 6:04 | · | solving troubleshooting had been carried |
| 6:06 | · | out to make this Landing get as far as |
| 6:08 | · | it did originally we were told it was |
| 6:10 | · | supposed to land around |
| 6:12 | · | 426 and I joke that by the way that |
| 6:15 | · | meant that the engine would be blazing |
| 6:17 | · | at 420 yeah uh but they delayed it by |
| 6:20 | · | two hours they delayed it by one orbit |
| 6:22 | · | why well uh apparently they discovered |
| 6:25 | · | that somebody had left a safety feature |
| 6:28 | · | enabled on The Landing laser Guidance |
| 6:31 | · | the lar system right so obviously when |
| 6:34 | · | you're working with us on the ground you |
| 6:35 | · | have safety features so that you don't |
| 6:37 | · | blind people there was a manual |
| 6:40 | · | interlock who would stop this activating |
| 6:42 | · | and somebody had forgotten to you know |
| 6:45 | · | take this out and so they didn't know |
| 6:47 | · | until they got to lunar orbit and they |
| 6:49 | · | tried to turn it on that their liar |
| 6:51 | · | wouldn't work and guess what it was a |
| 6:54 | · | complete fluke that this they actually |
| 6:57 | · | turned this on early so the spacecraft |
| 6:59 | · | had entered orbit slightly differently |
| 7:02 | · | than they'd expected and was slightly |
| 7:03 | · | closer to the Moon than they expected |
| 7:05 | · | and so they were trying to quantify this |
| 7:07 | · | perform a maneuver to bring it to a an |
| 7:10 | · | orbit they were comfortable so they |
| 7:11 | · | turned on the liar early and eventually |
| 7:14 | · | figured out that it didn't work and this |
| 7:16 | · | was really lucky because normally they |
| 7:19 | · | would only turn this on during the final |
| 7:21 | · | minutes of descent so landing on the |
| 7:24 | · | moon required the ability to precisely |
| 7:26 | · | measure the distance to the surface on |
| 7:28 | · | previous missions you know going back to |
| 7:30 | · | the' 60s we've had radar we've had |
| 7:32 | · | people looking out with their eyeballs |
| 7:34 | · | and of course the lunar Landers the |
| 7:36 | · | Apollo Landers they actually had a big |
| 7:38 | · | stick a contact probe that would uh turn |
| 7:42 | · | on a light when they were close to the |
| 7:43 | · | surface you know when it touched the |
| 7:45 | · | surface but modern spacecraft they like |
| 7:47 | · | to use liar the reason is that uh using |
| 7:50 | · | a laser it's much more Compact and |
| 7:52 | · | because the beam is so narrow you can |
| 7:54 | · | actually get good measurements at much |
| 7:57 | · | greater distances than using a radar |
| 7:59 | · | radar system now for getting into lunar |
| 8:02 | · | orbit and navigating in lunar orbit you |
| 8:04 | · | can use radio ranging with the various |
| 8:06 | · | onboard transmitters and there was |
| 8:09 | · | actually a payload called ln1 the lunar |
| 8:11 | · | node one navigation demonstrator which |
| 8:13 | · | was a small like cubat piece of Hardware |
| 8:16 | · | stuck on the side it was built at the |
| 8:18 | · | Marshall space flight center and so |
| 8:20 | · | while they were in lunar orbit they |
| 8:22 | · | actually tested this payload and used it |
| 8:24 | · | with groundbased measurements to |
| 8:26 | · | actually verify that they were in the |
| 8:27 | · | correct orbit so this knew where they |
| 8:29 | · | were with pretty good precision and they |
| 8:32 | · | could extrapolate that position forward |
| 8:34 | · | and when they were firing the engines |
| 8:36 | · | they could use the onboard inertial |
| 8:38 | · | navigation system with accelerometers |
| 8:40 | · | and gyroscopes to figure out where they |
| 8:43 | · | should be but the problem is then you're |
| 8:45 | · | ex you're integrating this forward that |
| 8:47 | · | means you're taking the solution and |
| 8:48 | · | stepping It Forward slowly in time and |
| 8:50 | · | each step has an error in uh the |
| 8:54 | · | velocity and the position so you could |
| 8:58 | · | descend towards the surface surface |
| 8:59 | · | using this but the errors would grow and |
| 9:01 | · | grow and by the time you got to the |
| 9:02 | · | surface you could be going too fast you |
| 9:05 | · | could be going too slow you could be in |
| 9:07 | · | the wrong place and getting a touchdown |
| 9:09 | · | on the surface would be highly unlikely |
| 9:12 | · | and the orbital navigation Hardware they |
| 9:14 | · | use just wouldn't be useful on the time |
| 9:16 | · | scale that was needed to land on the |
| 9:19 | · | surface and so with this in mind it was |
| 9:22 | · | extraordinarily fortuitous of them that |
| 9:24 | · | they had another payload called ndl the |
| 9:27 | · | navigation Doppler lidar for precise |
| 9:30 | · | velocity and range sensing and this is a |
| 9:33 | · | another liar system that was developed |
| 9:35 | · | by Langley research to do basically the |
| 9:38 | · | same thing the onboard liar was supposed |
| 9:40 | · | to do they just needed to figure out how |
| 9:43 | · | it could talk to The Landing software |
| 9:45 | · | and provide the exact updates to make |
| 9:47 | · | sure they could use it during The |
| 9:49 | · | Descent and they developed a patch for |
| 9:51 | · | their software integrated with their |
| 9:54 | · | computer and they committed to a landing |
| 9:56 | · | in 2 hours and that is about the same |
| 9:58 | · | amount of time that took to figure out |
| 10:00 | · | the problem with the abort switch on |
| 10:01 | · | Apollo 14 if you remember which is |
| 10:03 | · | another amazing Hack That was performed |
| 10:06 | · | on a computer so that a landing could be |
| 10:08 | · | carried out so respect to everyone |
| 10:11 | · | involved that made that happen um no |
| 10:14 | · | respect to whoever put together this |
| 10:16 | · | stream again because this simulation |
| 10:17 | · | you'll notice is running in a loop and |
| 10:20 | · | it's showing the spacecraft in an |
| 10:22 | · | attitude which was absolutely in no way |
| 10:24 | · | consistent with the physics of the |
| 10:26 | · | situation I would rather have had the |
| 10:28 | · | control room it had a lot more |
| 10:30 | · | interesting stuff going on and you know |
| 10:31 | · | if you looked really carefully I think |
| 10:34 | · | there's actually something interesting |
| 10:36 | · | going up on on in some of these displays |
| 10:38 | · | this is what I wanted to see it looked |
| 10:40 | · | like this was a report from the the ndl |
| 10:42 | · | the the laser thing the hero of the hour |
| 10:45 | · | if you will so this was just a tiny clue |
| 10:48 | · | that things were actually progressing it |
| 10:51 | · | would have been great to have this up on |
| 10:52 | · | the full screen but apparently at some |
| 10:55 | · | point they realized that this wasn't |
| 10:57 | · | supposed to be visible and they cut it |
| 10:58 | · | out |
| 10:59 | · | and so yeah for us observers this was |
| 11:01 | · | really kind of annoying but on the other |
| 11:03 | · | hand it is well understood these are |
| 11:05 | · | commercial organizations and they're |
| 11:06 | · | under no compulsion to actually share |
| 11:08 | · | any of this stuff with us so anyway the |
| 11:11 | · | time ticks down and eventually we get to |
| 11:13 | · | zero and suddenly contact is lost and |
| 11:17 | · | we're not sure what happens there's a |
| 11:19 | · | lot of anticipation a lot of question as |
| 11:21 | · | to whether they are able to get carrier |
| 11:23 | · | log we can hear over the comms they ask |
| 11:26 | · | the controllers to look at their last up |
| 11:29 | · | updated Telemetry you see if there's any |
| 11:31 | · | clues as to what happens and one person |
| 11:33 | · | comes back and said they noticed a a |
| 11:35 | · | roll happening just before they lost |
| 11:38 | · | contact and this is critical because the |
| 11:41 | · | High Gain antenna is more or less in a |
| 11:43 | · | fixed orientation on the side of the |
| 11:45 | · | spacecraft it was designed to land in a |
| 11:47 | · | certain place in a certain rotation so |
| 11:50 | · | that the antenna would be pointed at |
| 11:52 | · | Earth and so they could actually get the |
| 11:54 | · | down link Happening Now within a few |
| 11:56 | · | minutes they said they did have contact |
| 11:58 | · | they had carrier lock from G hilly in |
| 12:00 | · | the UK and they were getting some data |
| 12:03 | · | back but the amateur radio people around |
| 12:05 | · | the world could see that the data the |
| 12:07 | · | signal strength wasn't what it should be |
| 12:09 | · | it would be another 12 hours before we |
| 12:11 | · | had any further confirmation from |
| 12:13 | · | intuitive machines and they said that |
| 12:14 | · | yes we are in fact communicating and |
| 12:16 | · | commanding the payloads it is down |
| 12:19 | · | safely and to find out more tune into |
| 12:21 | · | our press conference with NASA at 5:00 |
| 12:23 | · | p.m. eastern time and that is a time |
| 12:25 | · | which I was going to be on a plane and |
| 12:26 | · | it turned out it was a plane without |
| 12:28 | · | Wi-Fi also by the way 5:00 p.m. Eastern |
| 12:31 | · | is after all the stock markets closed |
| 12:33 | · | and uh intuitive machines is on the |
| 12:35 | · | stock market so uh you can imagine what |
| 12:38 | · | would happen to the share price after |
| 12:39 | · | the uh well this was how they presented |
| 12:42 | · | the orientation of their Lander yeah it |
| 12:45 | · | turned out that initial claim that they |
| 12:46 | · | were upright was in fact based on |
| 12:48 | · | partial Telemetry that they hadn't got |
| 12:50 | · | the full story and they were instead |
| 12:52 | · | actually sitting on their side so that |
| 12:54 | · | is not only the successful second |
| 12:56 | · | successful lunar Landing this year but |
| 12:58 | · | also the second one that fell over |
| 13:00 | · | during the landing process and you know |
| 13:02 | · | let's be clear as Kerbal Space Program |
| 13:03 | · | players we've all been there according |
| 13:06 | · | to the press conference it was heading |
| 13:08 | · | down at 6 M hour it was going down range |
| 13:11 | · | at 2 m hour and the quote from Mission |
| 13:15 | · | Control that they observed an adverse |
| 13:17 | · | yaw just as they were touching down says |
| 13:19 | · | to me that one of the legs on the side |
| 13:22 | · | dug in and that rotated the spacecraft |
| 13:24 | · | and caused it to start tipping over it's |
| 13:27 | · | important to realize that if you're |
| 13:28 | · | Landing a spacecraft on the moon while |
| 13:30 | · | the gravity is one sixth that of Earth |
| 13:33 | · | the inertia of your spacecraft is |
| 13:35 | · | exactly the same and your sort of tip |
| 13:38 | · | over velocity the maximum speed at which |
| 13:40 | · | you can be going laterally before it |
| 13:41 | · | will upset H drops it actually drops as |
| 13:44 | · | a square root so typically about 40% of |
| 13:47 | · | what it would be on earth is sufficient |
| 13:49 | · | to cause the spacecraft to roll over |
| 13:51 | · | according to the press conference the |
| 13:53 | · | spacecraft is lying on panel e which you |
| 13:56 | · | know there's six sides of the spacecraft |
| 13:57 | · | so that's panel number five I guess and |
| 13:59 | · | that's the panel which contains an art |
| 14:02 | · | piece it's a Jeff Coon's phases of the |
| 14:05 | · | moon it's called uh it's like supposed |
| 14:07 | · | to contain a bunch of moons in a cube |
| 14:10 | · | and they're all slightly different and I |
| 14:11 | · | guess there's like nfts and things like |
| 14:13 | · | that Associated so I guess they actually |
| 14:16 | · | get a bonus point because they are |
| 14:18 | · | closer to the Moon than they would |
| 14:19 | · | otherwise be although you might have to |
| 14:21 | · | change your interpretation of the art |
| 14:23 | · | now that it is on its side rather than |
| 14:25 | · | vertical now one of the payloads I was |
| 14:27 | · | really hoping to see data from right |
| 14:29 | · | away was Eagle Cam and this is a camera |
| 14:32 | · | which would be ejected from the side of |
| 14:33 | · | the spacecraft and track the spacecraft |
| 14:36 | · | as it's performing the final Landing so |
| 14:37 | · | it would land on the surface and watch |
| 14:39 | · | the Lander coming down and that would no |
| 14:41 | · | doubt have provided some really cool |
| 14:43 | · | Clues as to what in fact happened except |
| 14:46 | · | that because of the changes to the uh |
| 14:49 | · | liar system they inhibited the |
| 14:51 | · | deployment of the camera and therefore |
| 14:54 | · | they're trying to decide whether they |
| 14:55 | · | can in fact deploy this camera in its |
| 14:57 | · | current orientation just so to get like |
| 15:00 | · | some third person views of the |
| 15:01 | · | spacecraft and the other payload that I |
| 15:03 | · | would really like to see the results of |
| 15:05 | · | is scalps the stereo camera for lunar |
| 15:09 | · | plume surface studies and this was a |
| 15:11 | · | series of multiple cameras on the legs |
| 15:14 | · | which would be pointed in towards where |
| 15:16 | · | the rocket engine is hoping to see how |
| 15:19 | · | the rocket interacts with the lunar |
| 15:21 | · | surface and that was the idea is they |
| 15:23 | · | want to figure out how plumes dig down |
| 15:26 | · | into the lunar surface and whether |
| 15:27 | · | there's things they can do to perhaps |
| 15:29 | · | model this physics better and understand |
| 15:31 | · | how say something like blue Origins |
| 15:33 | · | Lander might work on the moon here's the |
| 15:35 | · | thing we don't know how much bandwidth |
| 15:38 | · | they're going to have to get data back |
| 15:39 | · | in fact during the press conference it |
| 15:41 | · | sounded like they were having problems |
| 15:43 | · | switching over to a stable link to |
| 15:45 | · | actually get any data down the |
| 15:47 | · | spacecraft's autonomous systems are |
| 15:49 | · | designed to switch between two antennas |
| 15:51 | · | when it's getting poor signal quality so |
| 15:53 | · | it's switching back and forth before |
| 15:55 | · | they can get a connection established |
| 15:57 | · | and fix this problem but assuming they |
| 15:59 | · | fix this they will be doing most of the |
| 16:01 | · | communications over low gain and Tennis |
| 16:03 | · | which means less bandwidth and they are |
| 16:05 | · | racing against lunar night which is |
| 16:07 | · | going to come in about a week from now |
| 16:10 | · | so there's likely to be some sort of |
| 16:12 | · | triaging to do to decide which data to |
| 16:14 | · | get down before the spacecraft goes |
| 16:17 | · | quiet so while the mission is probably |
| 16:19 | · | going to be considered a success by NASA |
| 16:21 | · | it's not as successful as we'd like and |
| 16:24 | · | in terms of communication I don't think |
| 16:26 | · | they've been hugely successful and we're |
| 16:28 | · | really asking a lot of questions and not |
| 16:30 | · | getting answers and of course there are |
| 16:31 | · | critics saying well there 50 years on |
| 16:33 | · | from the Apollo program why can't we do |
| 16:36 | · | so much better than we did back then |
| 16:38 | · | well guess what this Mission has been |
| 16:40 | · | made and performed with a budget that is |
| 16:43 | · | 0.1% of the Apollo program if you |
| 16:46 | · | compare it to the surveyor program that |
| 16:47 | · | spent about $5 billion inflation |
| 16:50 | · | adjusted and you know again this is |
| 16:52 | · | vastly cheaper the previous missions |
| 16:54 | · | have been sent to the Moon uh you we've |
| 16:56 | · | got the lunar reconnaissance Orbiter |
| 16:58 | · | which is about half a billion Seline |
| 17:00 | · | about half a billion lady about 280 |
| 17:03 | · | million these are all much more |
| 17:06 | · | expensive than each of these clips |
| 17:08 | · | missions and so NASA is absolutely |
| 17:10 | · | betting that while they expect some |
| 17:13 | · | losses they are going to get much more |
| 17:15 | · | value for money from these commercial |
| 17:17 | · | organizations and by you know basically |
| 17:20 | · | funding them they're going to build up |
| 17:22 | · | an area of expertise in the commercial |
| 17:24 | · | Market which will enable further Landers |
| 17:26 | · | and bring the cost down that's what |
| 17:28 | · | they're hoping and I fully believe |
| 17:30 | · | that's what's going to happen we've |
| 17:31 | · | already had two launches this year there |
| 17:33 | · | are four other launches that are slated |
| 17:36 | · | for this year alone and I expect |
| 17:38 | · | failures but you know what quantity has |
| 17:41 | · | a quality in and off itself I'm Scott |
| 17:43 | · | Manley fly |
| 17:45 | · | [Music] |
| 17:50 | · | [Music] |
| 17:57 | · | safe |
| 18:04 | · | [Music] |
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19214403/adastra2.jpeg)