A Massacre of History in Colorado: The main victim in this exhibit is history itself

Every school child in Colorado is taught about the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864. On a wintry day in November of that year, an untrained and undisciplined territorial militia attacked an Indian camp near the eastern border of the territory leaving 150 to 200 dead. The tragedy has long been the subject of roiling debate about who or what was to blame. When the History Colorado Center opened a new exhibit on the event in 2012, visitors were offered competing perspectives of Indian, soldier, and settler.

The exhibit was immediately assailed by native activists for not taking an exclusively “indigenous perspective.” They demanded “co-authorship” of the exhibit, which was shut down. Last year, a revised exhibit opened, greased by a $400,000 federal grant.

The History Colorado Center announced proudly that the entire show had been “vetted and approved by tribal representatives.” The Denver Post enthused that “there are no detached experts on local history telling the story about how things happened.”

The result is a farce. It portrays the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes whose members were killed that day as peaceable spiritualists who spent their days nurturing family and staring at the skies. Malicious whites out to steal their land and commit genocide set upon them unprovoked. The whole thing just goes to show the need for “contemporary sovereignty” for native Americans as well as billions in reparations for centuries of harms.

A little history. The allied tribes of Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians migrated to the Colorado territory from present-day South Dakota in the 1830s fleeing tribal conflicts. They had been on these “traditional homelands,” as the exhibition calls them, for less time than many white settlers. The American civil war weakened security in the Western territories just as white settlement was increasing. In Colorado, one of two regular regiments was away fighting for the Union.

In Spring 1864, the Cheyenne and Arapaho began attacking farms, wagon trains, and stage coaches, usually leaving a dozen to two dozen dead with every raid. “Family time” for the tribes included a lot of time managing the babies and women they kidnapped. Arapaho informants reported that the two tribes had formed a pact with the Apaches, Kiowas, and Sioux to launch an all-out war on white settlers. The plans were real, even if the confederation never materialized. The news put Colorado officials on the alert. A similar all-Indian uprising in Minnesota in 1862 had left 700 whites dead.

Peace efforts by well-meaning men on both sides were repeatedly thwarted by rebels in their ranks. In June 1864, a white farmer, his wife, and two young children were murdered and scalped by Arapahos. Their bodies were put on display in front of the Denver City Hall. “The murders and the morbid display of the mutilated bodies touched off a feeling of panic,” noted University of Central Oklahoma professor Stan Hoig in his definitive 1961 history of the event, The Sand Creek Massacre. By summer, the territory was enduring weekly Indian attacks, even as it faced Confederate incursions from the south. Stagecoaches discontinued service. Denver was isolated, and its residents faced starvation. Many ranches were abandoned. In all, 208 whites were killed by Indians in the spring and summer of 1864.

The Colorado governor raised a volunteer force to steady nerves. It was this irregular corps that carried out the unnecessary raid in November. Condemnation was swift and unsparing. Three separate federal inquiries (Army, House, and Joint Congressional) were held at a time when the U.S. federal government had some rather major business in the American South. The “foul and dastardly massacre,” as the House investigation called it, led to the disbandment of the militia and the disgrace of its officers.

But debates on the event raged on. As late as 1959, a full-throated defense of the commander who led the raid was published by a lawyer under the title The Fighting Parson: The Biography of Colonel John M. Chivington. Many “eyewitnesses” had changed their accounts by the week, he found. The federal inquiries were driven by a desire for peace with the tribes, not a desire for justice, much less truth.

A 2013 book by the UC Davis historian Ari Kelman, Misplaced Massacre, also showed how good relations with the tribes, not the search for truth, explained federal behavior leading to the opening of a monument at the massacre site in 2007. The tribes, meanwhile, are revealed in that book as caring mainly about extracting resources from the American taxpayer via reparations, land grabs, and casino licenses. Their “oral histories” are contradictory, and it is the National Park Service scientists, not the native soothsayers, who find the actual massacre site in 1999. In the new exhibition, the death count is inexplicably revised upward to 230 based on “oral histories.”

If the purpose of the new exhibit is to stoke outrage and anger among the hundreds of schoolchildren who are ushered through every week, then it succeeds brilliantly. “I am so angry at history,” one 17-year old girl was quoted as saying afterwards. “Expose Chivington!” other students chanted upon exit.

But if the purpose was to tell the truth and encourage critical thinking, then the exhibit has no place in a public museum. The tribes have done exactly what the white rebels did after the massacre by telling a one-sided story filled with bloodlust against the enemy. Their “oral histories” are pure fabrication given that they are seven or eight generations removed from the event and most have only the faintest genetic ties to the Indians of the time. Certainly, they did not consult descendants of the victims of their spring and summer 1864 atrocities when considering their fable.

Defenders are now deploying the loaded terms “apologists” and “deniers” to anyone who questions the new exhibition. The main victim here is history itself.

***In Spring 1864, the Cheyenne and Arapaho began attacking farms, wagon trains, and stage coaches, usually leaving a dozen to two dozen dead with every raid.***

And in 1863 a band of pro-Union Osages wiped out a group of Confederate soldiers on the way to Colorado. On the bodies were found instructions to...
1. Encourage pro southern people of Colorado to join the Confederate army,..
AND
2. Orders to instigate the Indian Tribes to ATTACK SETTLERS in the Kansas-Colorado area.

No wonder after every Indian attack it was believed to be instigated by the Confederacy and is a reason Chivington, after Goliad, believed the tribes to be nothing but RED REBELS.

https://www.acatholicmission.org/8a-confederate-officers-massacred.html

“Confederate Officers Massacred on the Verdigris (May, 1863).
By May of 1863 a Little Rock, Arkansas-based Confederate General conceived a plan to draw the western Indians into the Confederate ranks. He recognized the tremendous power the Osages and other plains tribes might bring to their cause. Also, the fifty-mile-wide Osage reserve that stretched across much of the southern border of Kansas could be strategic. He sent a group of twenty-two officers up the Arkansas and Verdigris Rivers on a secret scouting and recruiting mission. When the group reached the plains, they were to divide up and try to influence various tribes to come to war with the Confederacy.”

The Indian tribes were not neutral in the Civil War. All the tribes of Oklahoma had joined the South.

The tribes that made or were negotiating treaties with the Confederacy.
Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Comanches, Wachitas, Kiowas, Pottawattamies, Chickasaws, Osages,
Seminoles, Senecas, Shawnees, Quawpaws.
The South also had Indian agents operating all throughout the High Plains and mountain region stirring up other tribes such as the Sioux, Cheyenne, Arapaho, Navajo and Apaches to make war on the Union at that time.
Their traditional enemies, Pawnee, Kaw, Osage (well, most of them) remained loyal to the Union.
The pro-Union Osages wiped out a party of Confederate officers heading for Colorado. On them were found instructions to...
#1, encourage southerners in Colorado to join the Confederate army.....and
#2, ENCOURAGE THE INDIAN TRIBES TO ATTACK SETTLERS IN THE KANSAS-COLORADO AREA.
That party was wiped out. Who knows how many other Confederate parties made it through with the same instructions.
“There is little doubt that the recent outbreak in the Northwest (Minnesota Uprising) has resulted from the efforts of secession agents operating through Canadian Indians and fur-traders.”—Mr Giddings, US Counsul-general in Canada

Fifty years ago I had the complete set of THE OLD WEST published by Time-Life books.
On the history of Sand Creek it was published that a baby had been found in the camp and thrown in a wagon box and later abandoned on the road. A horrible story to say the least!

Only problem was...Over 100 years before that story had been proven a fake. A baby was found, given to some captive women to take care of. A few days later it was noticed the women did not have the child. It seems they had abandoned it a couple of days before in the snow.

I learned the truth about Sand Creek fifty three years ago in the book MASSACRES OF THE MOUNTAINS by Dunn Jr. published around 1880 Also THE INDIAN WAR OF 1864 by Captain Eugene Ware who had a command in the North part of Colorado-Nebraska area at that time. He supported what Chivington had done.

Another one worth reading is ON THE BORDER WITH CROOK by Bourke.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.