Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Journal forced to unpublish paper after authors are caught using ChatGPT to write it
Fox News ^ | September 14, 2023 2:15am EDT | Michael Lee

Posted on 09/13/2023 11:29:26 PM PDT by Olog-hai

A scientific journal was forced to retract a paper it published last month after it was discovered the authors used the artificial intelligence application ChatGPT to write it.

The paper, published Aug. 9 in the journal Physica Scripta, was an attempt to uncover new solutions to a complicated math equation, but included the phrase “Regenerate response” on the third page — something one eagle-eyed reader recognized was the phrase of a button on ChatGPT, according to a report from Nature.

The authors of the paper have since acknowledged they used ChatGPT to help write the manuscript, something that wasn’t caught during two months of peer review after the paper was submitted in May. The revelation led the U.K.-based publisher to retract the paper because the authors did not disclose their use of the AI app when they submitted it.

“This is a breach of our ethical policies,” Kim Eggleton, who is in charge of peer review and research integrity at IOP publishing, said in a statement, according to Nature.

The apparent copy and paste error was discovered by computer scientist and integrity investigator Guillaume Cabanac, who since 2015 has made it a personal mission to uncover papers that are not transparent about their use of AI. …

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: ai; chatgpt; journal; openai; peerreview; physicascripta; scientific

1 posted on 09/13/2023 11:29:26 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I think this may be unjustified depending on what they used it for. Many math guys are just bad at writing and there is nothing wrong with using AI to rephrase your own sentences.


2 posted on 09/13/2023 11:43:24 PM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

In my college days, this was called ‘cheating’.


3 posted on 09/13/2023 11:52:35 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Prayers for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

Oh indeed


4 posted on 09/13/2023 11:59:14 PM PDT by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

They should just hire an Asian to write the paper.


5 posted on 09/14/2023 12:10:45 AM PDT by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Article doesn’t have names of paper authors. Gotta name and shame in cases like this.


6 posted on 09/14/2023 12:59:16 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What kind of unstylish fool ends a sentence with ‘it’?

I’ll bet FauxNews used AI to write this article.


7 posted on 09/14/2023 1:28:58 AM PDT by bakeneko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
included the phrase “Regenerate response” on the third page

Talk about lazy!

They used AI to write their paper, and then didn't bother to edit the results.

8 posted on 09/14/2023 1:45:15 AM PDT by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Yeah, and peer review is supposed to be the gold standard in ensuring integrity in scientific research.

What a bunch of hogwash.

It’s as corrupt and self-serving as any government agency.


9 posted on 09/14/2023 2:18:19 AM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bakeneko

“Yes, you can end a sentence with the word ‘it’. ‘It’ is a pronoun, and it is perfectly acceptable to end sentences with pronouns, such as in the following sentence: ‘I’ve never golfed before, but I’m sure I will like it.”

https://homework.study.com/explanation/can-you-end-a-sentence-with-it.html


10 posted on 09/14/2023 2:43:25 AM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bakeneko

Sorry, bakeneko, I needed to check it mainly for myself.


11 posted on 09/14/2023 2:48:11 AM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Bkmk


12 posted on 09/14/2023 2:50:26 AM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Retract it? It should be kept in publication forever, with a big warning across each page that it's a fraud.

Let other authors working on studies of fraud cite it as a source.

13 posted on 09/14/2023 4:39:34 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krosan

Yes the details matter, but for highly technical stories they are usually glossed over and fuzzy in news reporting. So us laymen of the public are often left pontificating without really understanding.


14 posted on 09/14/2023 5:34:30 AM PDT by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

15 posted on 09/14/2023 11:08:42 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson