1 posted on
09/13/2023 11:29:26 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
I think this may be unjustified depending on what they used it for. Many math guys are just bad at writing and there is nothing wrong with using AI to rephrase your own sentences.
2 posted on
09/13/2023 11:43:24 PM PDT by
Krosan
To: Olog-hai
In my college days, this was called ‘cheating’.
3 posted on
09/13/2023 11:52:35 PM PDT by
Ciexyz
(Prayers for America.)
To: Olog-hai
They should just hire an Asian to write the paper.
5 posted on
09/14/2023 12:10:45 AM PDT by
HIDEK6
(God bless Donald Trump. )
To: Olog-hai
Article doesn’t have names of paper authors. Gotta name and shame in cases like this.
6 posted on
09/14/2023 12:59:16 AM PDT by
glorgau
To: Olog-hai
What kind of unstylish fool ends a sentence with ‘it’?
I’ll bet FauxNews used AI to write this article.
7 posted on
09/14/2023 1:28:58 AM PDT by
bakeneko
To: Olog-hai
included the phrase “Regenerate response” on the third page Talk about lazy!
They used AI to write their paper, and then didn't bother to edit the results.
8 posted on
09/14/2023 1:45:15 AM PDT by
grobdriver
(The CDC can KMA!)
To: Olog-hai
Yeah, and peer review is supposed to be the gold standard in ensuring integrity in scientific research.
What a bunch of hogwash.
It’s as corrupt and self-serving as any government agency.
9 posted on
09/14/2023 2:18:19 AM PDT by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.)
To: Olog-hai
12 posted on
09/14/2023 2:50:26 AM PDT by
sauropod
(I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
To: Olog-hai
Retract it? It should be kept in publication forever, with a big warning across each page that it's a fraud.
Let other authors working on studies of fraud cite it as a source.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson