Posted on 10/11/2022 11:27:43 AM PDT by Red Badger
For millions of vaxx-nannies around the world, this bombshell admission will shake their worldviews. For those of us who have avoided the jabs at all costs, it will just reaffirm what we’ve suspected all along.
During European Parliamentary hearings, a Director for Pfizer admitted the Covid-19 “vaccines” were NOT tested for stopping transmission before they were released to the public. This makes sense since it has been known for a while that experimental injections do not prevent the spread of the coronavirus. Now we have confirmation that Big Pharma knew this before their puppets in government and corporate media began their pressure campaigns to get as many men, women, and children jabbed as many times as possible.
Here’s the video dropped by Rob Roos, a Member of the European Parliament:
VIDEO AT LINK...................
As Roos noted, this is a huge admission when we consider the entire predicate for draconian policies such as vaccine passports and vaccine mandates was to use the drugs to stop transmission. They used guilt and invoked personal responsibility to compel people to get injected even if they were not personally concerned about Covid-19.
Stopping transmission was the excuse used to strip tens of millions of Americans of their bodily autonomy. This was the argument used by leftists who couldn’t rightly claim forcing the jabs was acceptable but preventing abortions was not. They’d tell us the difference between the two actions in the bodily autonomy argument is that abortions don’t harm others but not getting jabbed would. As it turns out, the opposite is true. Getting abortion murders a preborn baby but not getting jabbed doesn’t hurt anyone, and now Pfizer is admitting it.
Don’t expect this to make a dent in the medical tyranny that’s still very present in the world today. They’ll ignore this bombshell. They’ll discredit Rob Roos and anyone who echoes the Pfizer Director’s words. But now, at least the truth is being spoken aloud.
Rob Roos MEP 🇳🇱
@Rob_Roos
🚨 BREAKING:
In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission.
“Get vaccinated for others” was always a lie.
The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.
The world needs to know. Share this video! ⤵️
BREAKING: Vaccine never tested on preventing transmission
This means the COVID passport was based on a big lie.
5:04 AM · Oct 11, 2022
Related....
The Pfizer Innoculations Do More Harm Than Good | Canadian Covid Care Alliance
https://www.brighteon.com/1628e039-11ac-4142-845a-9b21231a96de
How many lied about this “science”?
All of them.....................
...passed away with "no medical explanation"
And I'll bet they're not looking for one.
So you had to get the jab to keep your job because if you were unvaccinated you were a danger to others.
Now they admit the jab was not intended nor designed to stop transmission.
Do the fired unvaxxed get their jobs back?
Why aren’t the lawyers lining up for this one?
That's called fraud is saner circles. Except this isn't some shamwow con where you lose a couple of dollars, this has resulted in harm up to and including death, loss of livelihoods, and emotional distress. All with the sanction and participation of the State.
So, how does it get remedied?
Then who all were complicit in this fraud ?
Who said:" take the vaccine to prevent covid infection "?
That should include the NIH/FDA/CDC, commercial (Pfizer, Moderna) or agency and any other government official who compelled compliance.
Little wonder the FDA/CDC, offering cover, stated that it would take 74 years to publish all the supporting data regarding the covid vaccines,
until compelled to do so by court order.
Why aren’t the lawyers lining up for this one?
THEY WILL BE. Not to sue Pfizer, since they can’t, but they can sue the client’s former employer..................
THAT is why the CDC had to change the DEFINITION OF A VACCINE.
By definition a vaccine is to PREVENT a disease..............
Ping !
Nothing but 'snake oil' !
Which puts me in mind of this one, on Japan's Unit 731 and what we did with it ...
Because the PREP Act ensures that victims can’t successfully sue or press charges.
So all the government mandatory vaccination requirements for employees, health care workers and military is not about insuring that those individuals don't catch Covid, it was about.................what?........proving government could manipulate people.
18 U.S. Code § 1091 - Genocide
(a)Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1)kills members of that group;
(2)causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3)causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4)subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5)imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6)transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b)Punishment for Basic Offense.—The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—
(1)in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and
(2)a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.
(c)Incitement Offense.—
Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(d)Attempt and Conspiracy.—
Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.
(e)Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if—
(1)the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2)regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is—
(A)a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(B)an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));
(C)a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or
(D)present in the United States.
(f)Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.—
Notwithstanding section 3282, in the case of an offense under this section, an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.