Posted on 09/03/2021 2:17:50 PM PDT by Grandpa Drudge
A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited. Acute bronchopneumonia and tubular failure were assigned as the cause of death at autopsy; however, we did not observe any characteristic morphological features of COVID-19. Postmortem molecular mapping by real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed relevant SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb. These results might suggest that the first vaccination induces immunogenicity but not sterile immunity. We report on an 86-year-old male resident of a retirement home who received vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Past medical history included systemic arterial hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency, dementia and prostate carcinoma. On January 9, 2021, the man received lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine BNT162b2 in a 30 μg dose. On that day and in the following 2 weeks, he presented with no clinical symptoms (Table 1 ). On day 18, he was admitted to hospital for worsening diarrhea. Since he did not present with any clinical signs of COVID-19, isolation in a specific setting did not occur. Laboratory testing revealed hypochromic anemia and increased creatinine serum levels. Antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were negative.
(Excerpt) Read more at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...
From the absrtact in this autopsy:
"A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited."
Note carefully in that statement -
Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited
I am not a doctor, nor am I qualified to certify any conclusions from autopsies, however I HAVE accumulated a considerable amount of common sense understanding of important differences in various Covid-19 tests.
see https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3991215/posts
Now directly to the point of this autopsy
he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G
That specific test is positive precisely because he had been vaccinated. That test is actually designed to evaluate the presence of antibodies to the spike protein generated as a result of the mRNA vaccines.
while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited
The fact that this test was negative is very simple proof that he had NOT been infected with Covid-19. (the nucleocapsid test is precisely designed to test for antibodies to the Covid-19 virus itself, and deliberately does NOT test for antibodies to the spike protein generated by the vaccine .
In my opinion, this death was probably caused by the vaccine, and was actually not related at all to natural infection from Covid-19
I suggest this is very strong evidence that this vaccine is extremely dangerous for some people.
Furthermore, serious critical review by competent scientists MUST be completed ASAP to resolve this very obvious question.
Thanks, Gramps.
This has been around for a while. Why do we continue to resurrect it?
Jab old people—nothing could possibly go wrong....
wrong....
wrong....
wrong....
The only way they are jabbing me is if they find my corpse.
Good choice of screen name—I think they named some vaccines after you:
“Rare”
;-)
“while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited”
You are right, normally one develops multiple antibodies to the nucleocapsid, so if it were the virus those antibodies would be present.
If you don’t want to read it, then don’t.
“On day 18, he was admitted to hospital for worsening diarrhea. Since he did not present with any clinical signs of COVID-19, isolation in a specific setting did not occur. Laboratory testing revealed hypochromic anemia and increased creatinine serum levels. Antigen test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were negative”
One statement/test result doesn’t jive with the other. Those who would use this as an example of NOT a case of ‘vaccine’ reaction require others to suspend disbelief.
“systemic arterial hypertension, chronic venous insufficiency”
Yeah, for those with heart problems, adverse events (like death) from vaccination rise from a 1 in a hundred thousand likelihood to more like a one in ten thousand likelihood.
Of course the likelihood of a serious (like death) result from covid is much higher.
Thanks for that analysis!
I know on that IgG IgM test, one can have a positive IgG by itself, a positive IgM by itself, and both IgG and IgM positive together, depending on when one was infected.
And either the positive IgG by itself or positive IgM by itself isn’t usually seen; I forget which one is unusual.
If a sufficient amount of time had passed. it takes several days to generate even IgM
If a sufficient amount of time had passed. it takes several days to generate even IgM
You are right. you are not a doctor. He died of pneumonia and kidney failure not a vaccine
His Roommate tested positive the day before he did too. He caught it in the hospital. They had the same variant.
“This has been around for a while. Why do we continue to resurrect it?”
First that I remember seeing it.
For me, it was new.
Meaningless then, right? /s
Unless, YOU are the “ONE” in a hundred thousand likelihood.
Hey Mom, where is your buddy, Dr. GAS-BAG?
Wrong. The vaccinated man caught covid from a a covid positive patient they put in the same room as the old man.
On day 24, a patient in the same hospital room as our case tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. On day 25, our patient tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by real-time PCR (RT-PCR), with a low cycle threshold (Ct) value indicating high virus load. On further analysis of the swab sample, there was no evidence for mutant SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7, B.1.351 or B.1.1.28.1. Taken together, it appears the patient became infected from the patient in his hospital room.
“ This has been around for a while. Why do we continue to resurrect it? “
To frustrate people that, like you, seem to want to suppress it and any discussion of it?
Or who want to suppress any other things that serious discussion about, might tend to delay the imposition of a global medical surveillance state?
~Easy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.