Posted on 11/21/2020 6:32:53 AM PST by PK1991
On Friday Tucker Carlson gave a half hearted retraction to his hit commentary on Sidney Powell about not providing evidence of election fraud in the system. And at the same time stated he has seen no evidence and those at the WHITE HOUSE have seen no evidence ... I disagree with that and Tucker you are a “journalist” and you like to lecture others in the main stream media about how "journalists" investigate. How about you and FOX use some of your billions earned and “investigate” like journalists do and help the small legal team put together the "evidence."
Home | Newsfront
Tags: Media | Fox Competition
Trump-Friendly Newsmax Seeks to Cut Into Fox News Viewership
Wednesday, 18 November 2020 10:04 PM
Now that his largely invisible network has suddenly been flooded by fans of President Donald Trump, Newsmax television personality Grant Stinchfield is puffing out his chest.
“They don’t know what to do with all of us,” Stinchfield said on the air Monday night. “We’re killing it here on Newsmax with a tactic they’ve never tried. It’s called the truth, the stone-cold truth, and once you get a taste of it, you will never tolerate being lied to again.”
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/media-fox-competition/2020/11/18/id/997732/
No. They all, including tucker, just read the “approved” script from the teleprompter. It is fraud and fake news “all the way down”.
JoMa
No. They don’t even have enough people outside the studio to cover breaking news. A nuclear bomb could go off in New York city and it would be days before Fox even covered it.
She left, but Catherine Herridge was good.
“journalists” that investigate
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
After Catherine Herridge left, NO.
FOX ramped up their Trump backstabbing this week by going after his legal team ... Laura made public comments trying to kneecap Jenna Ellis & Tucker went after Sidney. They’ve hit my “unforgiveable” button. We’ve not been on FOX in any meaningful way since the election night hit job on Trump (my elderly dad still flips to FOX occasionally).
They all hate Trump because he won and revealed the phoniness of their “conservative” posture. The GOP and their sunshine pumpers have ran for decades on the fact that they did not have power. Then Trump won and the GOP had Congress. And what did they do? Nothing.
Tucker in the end is no different than Paul Ryan in that regard.
One second. :)
Do ANY of the major media have journalists that investigate?
“lawyers do not tip their hand to a preening press or public. Revealing evidence prematurely gives the opposition opportunity to tamper with it and undermine the president’s case. No one is owed that information just because they want it.”
Sally Zelikovsky
American Thinker.com
11/21/20
The media in large part can kiss my foot.....and any other unexposed places.
Tucker Carlson “should” recognize that there are leakers in the White House. Likely the walls have ears and any smart investigator / attorney will minimize the number of people that are privy to the evidence.
This crime is being solved by internet journalists.
Fox is officially a part of the fake news. They no longer have any credibility and are merely spouting DNC talking points.
This “lack of evidence” issue is somewhat old. A few days back, either on Rush or OAN I heard either Sydney Powell or Jenna Ellis say they have plenty of evidence but as with many trials they will not publicly release it. In this case the left will go after any witnesses that are exposed by Trump’s team as giving evidence.
This subject needs to be given a rest. We will not hear any evidence until such trials or other legal proceedings are in progress.
It’s understandable Fox is spouting DNC brainwashing points. What’s sad is many FReepers are buying into this lack of evidence propaganda thinking all is lost and we have to accept Biden.
Trump does not have to concede, nor does he have to prematurely help out with a fake transition. The various Constitutional and other legal processes must be allowed to proceed before we even think of a transition. Once these processes are complete, then and only then can Trump transition into a second term and start prosecuting the left.
Yeah. They get their daily memo, change a word or two and run with it. Lazy liars.
Agree but in this case they are trying to crown Biden based on the media proclamations. There is a need to to take the air out of that narrative while the preparation of the legal case is accomplished while at the same time holding cards back. It allows legislatures and election officials the cover needed to let the process continue and the legal case to be perfected.
John Stossel was on the network a lot. James Rosen did some investigations, but they let him go because of accusations of inappropriate conduct. And of course, Geraldo, but his investigative reporting ended when he opened Al Capone’s vault.
There are no investigative journalists and never were.
it was a lie that they existed, perpetrated by right wing nuts.
The government knows everything and that’s all we need to know
:)
If you parse carefully what he said, he didn’t say that the White house hadn’t seen evidence. He said the contacts he had at the white house hadn’t seen it. And he never said what Trump himself knew or didn’t.
He did the same thing when talking about Trump’s legal team. He said his contacts in the legal team hadn’t seen the evidence. But tucker was intentionally misleading to imply that NO ONE on the team had seen it.
I’m not excusing Tucker at all. He knows that when journalists use this kind of language, people will come away with the false implication you did, that NO ONE at the white house including Trump had seen any.
Journalists use this kind of language intentionally to mislead. It is the malpractice of the day. I am sad to see Tucker falling into this. He tried to Bully Trump’s lawyer onto his show, with threats of making them look bad. Well this is him acting on that threat.
Trump’s lawyers have no obligation to tell Tucker anything. Why should they play their hand prematurely instead of showing it first in court.
Does Fox News have “any” journalists which fit the definition.
What is a Journalist?
A journalist is someone who investigates, collects and presents information as a news story. This can be presented through newspapers, magazines, radio, television and the internet. Journalists are relied upon to present news in a well-rounded, objective manner. Source: Careerexplorer.co
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.