Posted on 11/11/2020 9:48:12 AM PST by 2harddrive
Just watch the first 4 minutes and 45 seconds to see the PROOF. This is COURTROOM-GRADE evidence
https://www.foundingfathers.org/Papers/Politics/BenfordsLaw_n_ElectionFraud.aspx?fbclid=IwAR3EbBv-mBvmzvhEnX36XRb8eXFdX3PmxJN0QCqXPkqeuwdIr3gequsfHCY
https://www.foundingfathers.org/Papers/Politics/BenfordsLaw_n_ElectionFraud.aspx?fbclid=IwAR3EbBv-mBvmzvhEnX36XRb8eXFdX3PmxJN0QCqXPkqeuwdIr3gequsfHCY
Let’s apply Benford’s Law to Georgia because there’s going to be hand recount in that state soon and that’s where the next battle will be.
Not the kind of science the Rats endorse.
AGREED! And the article DID analyze Georgia in Step 3.
ADMIN: Can you please upgrade this to Front Page News?
I have seen screen shots of those Benford distributions but no links to the actual data.
It is Arthur Anderson LLC. Furthermore, Benford's Law is not conclusive to fraud, it is merely raises a big warning flag, that requires more scrutiny, and even more so when it is violated so many times. Even the person in the video, states they may be committing fraud. That said, it is an excellent tool to use to see if fraud was even remotely possible, and that it should be looked at very closely.
Thanks for the post.
“Thanks for the post.”
You are very welcome!
I’d like to see charts of Miami, TN, OK and other places — do Joe’s numbers adhere to Benford’s Law in places that were not “battlegrounds”? Does Joe only have hinky numbers in states where the “magic” had to happen?
You’re going to have to have proof that will stand up in court. Show it. I want Trump to win, but rumors sewn together aren’t going to do it.
Awesome, does anyone know enough about this to site a case that its been used to break open?
It would seem that any one-off could raise a fraud issue, but potentially not be. But, multiple cases are major red flag! I am sure there are statistics that show the probability of the law being broken and it not being fraud.
I’m no expert but I don’t think this sort of analysis is considered “proof” of anything in a court of law. But what it really is, is a big sign saying “Dig here”.
It’s very good justification for deep investigation.
It depends on the system the state uses, and what detail it exposes to the web user. I haven't found the Illinois or Pennsylvania precinct-level data yet, but I did find Milwaukee.
I just recreated the Milwaukee charts using the data found here: https://county.milwaukee.gov/EN/County-Clerk/Off-Nav/Election-Results/Election-Results-Fall-2020
Under the Presidential race summary, click the box labeled "Expand / Collapse Totals by Wards" to get the precinct details.
-PJ
Benford’s Law is used in court. It’s not conclusive proof of fraud, but it’s an indicator. In conjunction with other evidence, it could be part of a conclusive case that a recount and/or an audit needs to take place.
There’s no way this would overturn an election, but it’s part of an overall strategy.
Click "Download Results" to get a spreadsheet with all the precincts. One difference from the chart in the article is that this file has 1,599 precincts, not the 2,054 shown in the article. President Trump's chart has the digit 2 greater than 1, but otherwise the chart fits the law. Biden's chart matches the shape of the chart in the article.
-PJ
https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/PA/Allegheny/106267/web.264614/#/detail/0004. Download the xls file on the right side of the page.
I have now recreated all three cities in the article.
-PJ
“Awesome, does anyone know enough about this to site a case that its been used to break open?”
YES! This is how they caught the fraud hidden in ENRON about 20 years ago!
“You’re going to have to have proof that will stand up in court.” Page 2 proved it! Statistically, it is a certain as a DNA test!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.