https://www.foundingfathers.org/Papers/Politics/BenfordsLaw_n_ElectionFraud.aspx?fbclid=IwAR3EbBv-mBvmzvhEnX36XRb8eXFdX3PmxJN0QCqXPkqeuwdIr3gequsfHCY
Let’s apply Benford’s Law to Georgia because there’s going to be hand recount in that state soon and that’s where the next battle will be.
Not the kind of science the Rats endorse.
I have seen screen shots of those Benford distributions but no links to the actual data.
It is Arthur Anderson LLC. Furthermore, Benford's Law is not conclusive to fraud, it is merely raises a big warning flag, that requires more scrutiny, and even more so when it is violated so many times. Even the person in the video, states they may be committing fraud. That said, it is an excellent tool to use to see if fraud was even remotely possible, and that it should be looked at very closely.
Thanks for the post.
I’d like to see charts of Miami, TN, OK and other places — do Joe’s numbers adhere to Benford’s Law in places that were not “battlegrounds”? Does Joe only have hinky numbers in states where the “magic” had to happen?
You’re going to have to have proof that will stand up in court. Show it. I want Trump to win, but rumors sewn together aren’t going to do it.
Awesome, does anyone know enough about this to site a case that its been used to break open?
It would seem that any one-off could raise a fraud issue, but potentially not be. But, multiple cases are major red flag! I am sure there are statistics that show the probability of the law being broken and it not being fraud.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Benford’s law doesn’t prove anything. Because Benford’s law is about TRENDS and there will always be statistical anomalies. The best it can do is say “that’s odd”.