Posted on 01/16/2019 3:02:39 PM PST by ETL
Krill, crustaceans smaller than a cigarette, play an outsize role in the ecology of the ocean around Antarctica: Penguins, whales, and other predators feast on vast swarms of the shrimplike animals.
Now, researchers have launched a broad international survey of krill’s main habitat in the Scotia Sea—the first in nearly 20 years—to learn whether a growing fishing industry is leaving enough for krill’s natural predators.
The effort, led by the Institute of Marine Research (IMR) in Bergen, Norway, began in earnest last week when Norway’s new polar research vessel Kronprins Haakon sailed from Punta Arenas, Chile, for the Scotia Sea. It and five other vessels will spend nearly 2 months mapping krill abundance across an area about the size of Mexico. Beside gauging population, the project will test tools for cheaper, more frequent surveys that could improve oversight of the fishery. “With a more dynamic management system, we can be more certain that the fishery is not negatively affecting the krill populations or the predators,” says Bjørn Krafft, a marine biologist at IMR who is directing the $5 million Norwegian cruise.
Soviet vessels were the first to ply the Southern Ocean for krill, which was ground into fish meal. By the 1980s, scientists began to worry about the effect on krill-feeding predators. The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), a treaty organization established in 1982, set tight limits on fishing, now at 620,000 tons per year. Most fishing stopped after the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, but it has been slowly growing again. Norway takes about half the current catch, extracting omega-3 fatty acids for nutritional supplements. “We absolutely need to know whether the catch limit is still precautionary,” says Simeon Hill, an ecologist with the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, who is not involved in the project.
CCAMLR organized the previous large krill survey, in 2000. The central finding—about 60 million tons of krill in the Scotia Sea—reassured managers that they had been adequately conservative. But much smaller surveys, conducted annually in a few places, have shown that regional krill populations go through boom and bust cycles, making it harder to gauge the health of the overall stock from a single survey. “We have pieces, but we are missing the big picture,” says marine biologist Rodolfo Werner, an adviser to the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition, who is based in Bariloche, Argentina.
Casting a wide net
To estimate abundance of krill, a keystone species, six ships will use echosounders and focus sampling around fishing hot spots.
During the survey, vessels will retrace the previous transects, measuring krill swarms with echosounders, a kind of sonar, and confirming the identification with sampling trawls. Some ships will measure oceanographic variables as well, such as temperature, currents, and plankton, to see whether they can be used to predict krill abundance.
IMR will also test remote devices that could gather krill data continuously and more cheaply. The Haakon will deploy moored sensors, as well as wave gliders and a sail-propelled buoy, in order to compare their readings with the net and echosounder data. “This is one of the most beneficial parts of the survey,” says Bettina Meyer, a krill ecophysiologist at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, Germany.
At the same time, land-based teams from IMR and the Norwegian Polar Institute will track seals, whales, and penguins foraging for krill in the Bransfield Strait, an important feeding ground near the Antarctic Peninsula. Matching their feeding behavior with survey results “has big potential to get a better idea of the interactions between the krill fisheries and the predators,” says So Kawaguchi, a marine ecologist with the Australian Antarctic Division in Kingston.
The survey itself won’t be able to reveal how the overall krill population in the Scotia Sea might have changed since the 2000 survey, given the variability of krill populations over space and time. Finding out what drives population changes will require more research on the seasonal movement of krill, for example, and the impact of climate change. Loss of sea ice, which protects young krill from predators, is expected to reduce their abundance, and rising water temperatures and acidification could also pose serious threats—ones that even the best management plan might not avert.
Ban fishing!
Meh. Antarctica has plenty of fish on the south shore.
The trick is finding the south shore.
Lol!
“The trick is finding the south shore.”
I saw what you did.
Overfishing is a real problem. Many traditional food species have been fished nearly to extinction. Northern cod, halibut, and many others. Notice how expensive any good fish is now?
Might it be possible to farm and restock large fishing areas — making fishermen happy and keeping the krill to reasonable levels?
btt
Why not increase the krill supply by harvesting the top predators?
And neither cod nor halibut is nearing anything like extinction - in fact both are particularly abundant. Nor as far as any legitimate estimates is any other species.
So not only is this real fake news, but merits a
Below 40S there is no law
Below 50S there is no hope
Below 60S There is no God.
Be a great place to build a summer home! (South shore of Antarctica) :)
Ongoing radioactive fallout from Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan of water being constantly pumped in trying to prevent the core melting through and poisoning the pacific is the culprit.
Read
Revelation 8:9
Heavens to Betsy. The planet is 75% ocean. We couldn’t overfish it if we tried.
This story may be true or false. There was a time I would not question a “scientific” study. However those days are gone.
Scientist have sold their souls for money. Too many are willing to lie and make up stuff to keep the research money flowing. And if not for money, for idealogy reasons.
Scientist have become priest in the new world religion MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE.
Scientist can not longer be trusted. So like I said, this story may be true or false I have no way of knowing and I don’t have the time (or interest) to check it out more deeply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.